Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/19/2013 5:33 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:02:46 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:40:03 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0500, ESAD wrote: It is an old story. I first heard it in the 60s. Both assassins were known by their three names. All criminals are known by 3 names if they have them. It helps avoid misidentification. I am also not sure how they say Booth was assassinated unless you think the Union army were assassins. He was shot in a barn by union soldiers. You have to stretch the truth in order to make the plot work!! There are a number of those "coincidences" that involve quite a stretch to believe. The list keeps getting longer too. It takes a *real* stretch to believe any of 'Bama's gun policies would have prevented the CT massacre! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! It's a real stretch to think it happened the way they told us.. Especially for those of us who watched it live on TV. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/19/13 5:39 PM, JustWait wrote:
It's a real stretch to think it happened the way they told us.. Especially for those of us who watched it live on TV. 3.8 billion years of evolution and we still have morons like Snotty Scotty...living proof there is no such thing as intelligent design. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
On 1/19/2013 5:33 PM, Salmonbait wrote: On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:02:46 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:40:03 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0500, ESAD wrote: It is an old story. I first heard it in the 60s. Both assassins were known by their three names. All criminals are known by 3 names if they have them. It helps avoid misidentification. I am also not sure how they say Booth was assassinated unless you think the Union army were assassins. He was shot in a barn by union soldiers. You have to stretch the truth in order to make the plot work!! There are a number of those "coincidences" that involve quite a stretch to believe. The list keeps getting longer too. It takes a *real* stretch to believe any of 'Bama's gun policies would have prevented the CT massacre! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! It's a real stretch to think it happened the way they told us.. Especially for those of us who watched it live on TV. There's that insanity!!!! Please tell us how you watched the massacre "live in TV"!!!!!!! |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/20/2013 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:30:00 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... It's a real stretch to think it happened the way they told us.. Especially for those of us who watched it live on TV. There's that insanity!!!! Please tell us how you watched the massacre "live in TV"!!!!!!! The shooting wasn't live but the cameras were there shortly after the first cops responded and it was the only thing on CNN (and I assume the other news networks) most of the day with more guessing than reporting going on. That is how this kid was misidentified as his brother, how the "two shooter" story got out and a number of other errors that happen when they report news before they have enough facts to say anything close to accurate. Please Greg... Why answer the false narrative that I said I watched "the massacre" live on TV. Quite frankly I think we would all be better served if we all decided to ignore the strawmen here until they learn to ask a question properly, based on facts, not their own fantasy... |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/20/2013 12:47 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/20/2013 12:24 PM, wrote: On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:30:00 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... It's a real stretch to think it happened the way they told us.. Especially for those of us who watched it live on TV. There's that insanity!!!! Please tell us how you watched the massacre "live in TV"!!!!!!! The shooting wasn't live but the cameras were there shortly after the first cops responded and it was the only thing on CNN (and I assume the other news networks) most of the day with more guessing than reporting going on. That is how this kid was misidentified as his brother, how the "two shooter" story got out and a number of other errors that happen when they report news before they have enough facts to say anything close to accurate. Please Greg... Why answer the false narrative that I said I watched "the massacre" live on TV. Quite frankly I think we would all be better served if we all decided to ignore the strawmen here until they learn to ask a question properly, based on facts, not their own fantasy... Take away Harry's fantasies and he won't have anything to hang his hat on. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/19/13 5:33 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:02:46 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:40:03 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0500, ESAD wrote: It is an old story. I first heard it in the 60s. Both assassins were known by their three names. All criminals are known by 3 names if they have them. It helps avoid misidentification. I am also not sure how they say Booth was assassinated unless you think the Union army were assassins. He was shot in a barn by union soldiers. You have to stretch the truth in order to make the plot work!! There are a number of those "coincidences" that involve quite a stretch to believe. The list keeps getting longer too. It takes a *real* stretch to believe any of 'Bama's gun policies would have prevented the CT massacre! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! It's a real stretch to believe you are not well along the path to senility. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:02:46 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:40:03 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0500, ESAD wrote: It is an old story. I first heard it in the 60s. Both assassins were known by their three names. All criminals are known by 3 names if they have them. It helps avoid misidentification. I am also not sure how they say Booth was assassinated unless you think the Union army were assassins. He was shot in a barn by union soldiers. You have to stretch the truth in order to make the plot work!! There are a number of those "coincidences" that involve quite a stretch to believe. The list keeps getting longer too. It takes a *real* stretch to believe any of 'Bama's gun policies would have prevented the CT massacre! How do you know they wouldn't have, Narrow Minded Racist? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The sort of morons... | General | |||
New boat - sort of... | General | |||
A visit with an interesting guy who builds an interesting boat.... | General | |||
Back and Better...Sort of... | ASA | |||
In and out sort of report | ASA |