On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:02:46 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:40:03 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0500, ESAD wrote:

It is an old story. I first heard it in the 60s.





Both assassins were known by their three names.

All criminals are known by 3 names if they have them.
It helps avoid misidentification.

I am also not sure how they say Booth was assassinated unless you
think the Union army were assassins. He was shot in a barn by union
soldiers.

You have to stretch the truth in order to make the plot work!!

There are a number of those "coincidences" that involve quite a
stretch to believe. The list keeps getting longer too.

It takes a *real* stretch to believe any of 'Bama's gun policies would have prevented the CT
massacre!


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:02:46 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:40:03 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0500, ESAD wrote:

It is an old story. I first heard it in the 60s.





Both assassins were known by their three names.

All criminals are known by 3 names if they have them.
It helps avoid misidentification.

I am also not sure how they say Booth was assassinated unless you
think the Union army were assassins. He was shot in a barn by union
soldiers.

You have to stretch the truth in order to make the plot work!!

There are a number of those "coincidences" that involve quite a
stretch to believe. The list keeps getting longer too.

It takes a *real* stretch to believe any of 'Bama's gun policies would
have prevented the CT
massacre!


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

It's good you and Ingerfool channel each other.

On 1/19/2013 5:33 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:02:46 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:40:03 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0500, ESAD wrote:

It is an old story. I first heard it in the 60s.





Both assassins were known by their three names.

All criminals are known by 3 names if they have them.
It helps avoid misidentification.

I am also not sure how they say Booth was assassinated unless you
think the Union army were assassins. He was shot in a barn by union
soldiers.

You have to stretch the truth in order to make the plot work!!

There are a number of those "coincidences" that involve quite a
stretch to believe. The list keeps getting longer too.

It takes a *real* stretch to believe any of 'Bama's gun policies would have prevented the CT
massacre!


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!


It's a real stretch to think it happened the way they told us..
Especially for those of us who watched it live on TV.

On 1/19/13 5:39 PM, JustWait wrote:



It's a real stretch to think it happened the way they told us..
Especially for those of us who watched it live on TV.

3.8 billion years of evolution and we still have morons like Snotty
Scotty...living proof there is no such thing as intelligent design.

In article ,
says...

On 1/19/13 5:39 PM, JustWait wrote:



It's a real stretch to think it happened the way they told us..
Especially for those of us who watched it live on TV.

3.8 billion years of evolution and we still have morons like Snotty
Scotty...living proof there is no such thing as intelligent design.

Oh, man..... He's STILL claiming he watched the CT massacre "live in
TV"!! I guess the gunman must have gotten a hold of the TV crews so they
could set up a live remote before he got there and started blasting the
place up!!!!

In article , says...

On 1/19/2013 5:33 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:02:46 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:40:03 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0500, ESAD wrote:

It is an old story. I first heard it in the 60s.





Both assassins were known by their three names.

All criminals are known by 3 names if they have them.
It helps avoid misidentification.

I am also not sure how they say Booth was assassinated unless you
think the Union army were assassins. He was shot in a barn by union
soldiers.

You have to stretch the truth in order to make the plot work!!

There are a number of those "coincidences" that involve quite a
stretch to believe. The list keeps getting longer too.

It takes a *real* stretch to believe any of 'Bama's gun policies would have prevented the CT
massacre!


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!


It's a real stretch to think it happened the way they told us..
Especially for those of us who watched it live on TV.

There's that insanity!!!! Please tell us how you watched the massacre
"live in TV"!!!!!!!

On 1/20/2013 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:30:00 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

It's a real stretch to think it happened the way they told us..
Especially for those of us who watched it live on TV.

There's that insanity!!!! Please tell us how you watched the massacre
"live in TV"!!!!!!!




The shooting wasn't live but the cameras were there shortly after the
first cops responded and it was the only thing on CNN (and I assume
the other news networks) most of the day with more guessing than
reporting going on.
That is how this kid was misidentified as his brother, how the "two
shooter" story got out and a number of other errors that happen when
they report news before they have enough facts to say anything close
to accurate.


Please Greg... Why answer the false narrative that I said I watched "the
massacre" live on TV.

Quite frankly I think we would all be better served if we all decided to
ignore the strawmen here until they learn to ask a question properly,
based on facts, not their own fantasy...

On 1/20/2013 12:47 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/20/2013 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:30:00 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

It's a real stretch to think it happened the way they told us..
Especially for those of us who watched it live on TV.

There's that insanity!!!! Please tell us how you watched the massacre
"live in TV"!!!!!!!




The shooting wasn't live but the cameras were there shortly after the
first cops responded and it was the only thing on CNN (and I assume
the other news networks) most of the day with more guessing than
reporting going on.
That is how this kid was misidentified as his brother, how the "two
shooter" story got out and a number of other errors that happen when
they report news before they have enough facts to say anything close
to accurate.


Please Greg... Why answer the false narrative that I said I watched "the
massacre" live on TV.

Quite frankly I think we would all be better served if we all decided to
ignore the strawmen here until they learn to ask a question properly,
based on facts, not their own fantasy...

Take away Harry's fantasies and he won't have anything to hang his hat on.

On 1/19/13 5:33 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:02:46 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:40:03 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0500, ESAD wrote:

It is an old story. I first heard it in the 60s.





Both assassins were known by their three names.

All criminals are known by 3 names if they have them.
It helps avoid misidentification.

I am also not sure how they say Booth was assassinated unless you
think the Union army were assassins. He was shot in a barn by union
soldiers.

You have to stretch the truth in order to make the plot work!!

There are a number of those "coincidences" that involve quite a
stretch to believe. The list keeps getting longer too.

It takes a *real* stretch to believe any of 'Bama's gun policies would have prevented the CT
massacre!


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!


It's a real stretch to believe you are not well along the path to senility.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:02:46 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:40:03 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0500, ESAD wrote:

It is an old story. I first heard it in the 60s.





Both assassins were known by their three names.

All criminals are known by 3 names if they have them.
It helps avoid misidentification.

I am also not sure how they say Booth was assassinated unless you
think the Union army were assassins. He was shot in a barn by union
soldiers.

You have to stretch the truth in order to make the plot work!!

There are a number of those "coincidences" that involve quite a
stretch to believe. The list keeps getting longer too.

It takes a *real* stretch to believe any of 'Bama's gun policies would have prevented the CT
massacre!

How do you know they wouldn't have, Narrow Minded Racist?