On 1/8/2013 6:59 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/7/13 10:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:10:35 -0500, ESAD wrote:


Indeed, I think Palin is an ignorant bitch and if she had the chance,
she'd shoot a moose so she could stick its head on her wall.

It is not unlike a person who kills a marlin to put it on the wall or
a person who kills a rock fish to put it on the table.
Dead is dead.


Palin kills animals for "sport." Killing animals for sport ain't sporting.

Killing babies for convenience sake ain't human.

On 1/8/2013 9:31 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 1/8/2013 6:59 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/7/13 10:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:10:35 -0500, ESAD wrote:


Indeed, I think Palin is an ignorant bitch and if she had the chance,
she'd shoot a moose so she could stick its head on her wall.

It is not unlike a person who kills a marlin to put it on the wall or
a person who kills a rock fish to put it on the table.
Dead is dead.


Palin kills animals for "sport." Killing animals for sport ain't
sporting.

Killing babies for convenience sake ain't human.

good point.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:59:03 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/7/13 10:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:10:35 -0500, ESAD wrote:


Indeed, I think Palin is an ignorant bitch and if she had the chance,
she'd shoot a moose so she could stick its head on her wall.

It is not unlike a person who kills a marlin to put it on the wall or
a person who kills a rock fish to put it on the table.
Dead is dead.


Palin kills animals for "sport." Killing animals for sport ain't sporting.

So why do people spent money to catch tarpon and bill fish?

Penis envy.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:34:27 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:10:35 -0500, ESAD wrote:


Indeed, I think Palin is an ignorant bitch and if she had the chance,
she'd shoot a moose so she could stick its head on her wall.

It is not unlike a person who kills a marlin to put it on the wall or
a person who kills a rock fish to put it on the table.
Dead is dead.

You see no difference in people killing for sustenance and people
killing to hang a dead animal on the wall?

A vegan would say there is no difference.

Also there is a thriving business of trophy fishing to hang a dead
fish on the wall.

That's not what I asked. And yes, those with low self esteem do seem to
like to hand dead fish on walls.

On 1/8/13 10:23 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:59:03 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/7/13 10:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:10:35 -0500, ESAD wrote:


Indeed, I think Palin is an ignorant bitch and if she had the chance,
she'd shoot a moose so she could stick its head on her wall.

It is not unlike a person who kills a marlin to put it on the wall or
a person who kills a rock fish to put it on the table.
Dead is dead.


Palin kills animals for "sport." Killing animals for sport ain't sporting.

So why do people spent money to catch tarpon and bill fish?


I don't know...to prove their manhood or to show they have a connection
to a time when mankind needed hunter-gatherer skills to survive? When I
fished, I was never that interested in going after "trophy" fish. When
we lived in the St. Augustine area, I'd love to pull into the seaplane
lagoon off the ICW at certain times of the year when tarpon were in the
area and watch them play. It never occurred to me to try and catch one.

I think we are going to Kenya this summer to visit a college chum of my
wife's and if we do, we'll go on a photo safari. I wouldn't mind some
photos on the wall of what we see, but I don't feel the need to put an
animal's head on the wall.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:33:34 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

You see no difference in people killing for sustenance and people
killing to hang a dead animal on the wall?

A vegan would say there is no difference.

Also there is a thriving business of trophy fishing to hang a dead
fish on the wall.

That's not what I asked. And yes, those with low self esteem do seem to
like to hand dead fish on walls.

Maybe I just don't understand your question. The Palins make a big
deal about eating the things they kill and I don't remember seeing a
lot of dead animals on the wall. (but I didn't watch the TV show)

You said killing is killing. Therefore, I asked "you see no difference
in people killing for sustenance and people killing to hang a dead
animal on the wall".

On 1/8/13 12:17 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:49:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:33:34 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

You see no difference in people killing for sustenance and people
killing to hang a dead animal on the wall?

A vegan would say there is no difference.

Also there is a thriving business of trophy fishing to hang a dead
fish on the wall.

That's not what I asked. And yes, those with low self esteem do seem to
like to hand dead fish on walls.

Maybe I just don't understand your question. The Palins make a big
deal about eating the things they kill and I don't remember seeing a
lot of dead animals on the wall. (but I didn't watch the TV show)

You said killing is killing. Therefore, I asked "you see no difference
in people killing for sustenance and people killing to hang a dead
animal on the wall".

I suppose it would depend on whether they ate the rest of the animal.

I am opposed to trophy hunting if that is the question but I never had
the impression that was what the Palins were. Todd is (was?) a
commercial fisherman and Sarah bragged about her moose stew.


Their time would have been more productively spent teaching their
ignorant children about contraceptives.

On Monday, January 7, 2013 8:36:30 PM UTC-5, BAR wrote:
In article ,

says...



...the ignorant bitch...



...would shoot it.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOm1t...ature=youtu.be



Your fascination with Sarah Palin has out-live anyone else's.

Opposites attract. Sarah is active, attractive, successful...
and pays her taxes.

In article ,
says...

On Monday, January 7, 2013 8:36:30 PM UTC-5, BAR wrote:
In article ,

says...



...the ignorant bitch...



...would shoot it.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOm1t...ature=youtu.be



Your fascination with Sarah Palin has out-live anyone else's.

Opposites attract. Sarah is active, attractive, successful...
and pays her taxes.

snerk

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:19:27 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



"ESAD" wrote in message
om...

On 1/7/13 10:24 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:15:23 -0500, ESAD wrote:



Indeed. I think it is important to remind some people of Palin and
her
stupidity. She could have been an old man's heartbeat away from the
presidency.

Well the old man is still alive so she would have just been sitting
around with nothing to do like Biden.
Sarah wasn't the scary one. The old man would very likely have us
in
a war in Iran right now.

Remember "Bomb Bomb, Bomb Iran' (to the tune of Barbara Ann)?


All the GOP nominee wannabes this last election with the exception of
Portman were saber-rattling warmongers, and several of them (Santorum,
Perry, Bachman, Cain) were at least as stupid as Palin. Practical
intelligence, never mind intellectual intelligence, doesn't seem to be
an attribute much sought these days in the GOP.

Christine O'Donnell, Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Jan Brewer...the
four GOP women of the apocalypse, and all bottom divers.

----------------------------------------------

Harry,

It's ok. The election is over. Your man won.

Don't you mean 'our man won'?

P.S. You might want to remind Big Ed, Rachel, Big Al and the others
of the fact.
They still delight virtually every night in mocking Romney and other
Republican candidates who lost.
Doesn't contribute to developing any sense of bi-partisanship or
harmony in the country.
Lean Forward.