In article , says...

On 1/3/2013 7:00 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:05:41 -0500, ESAD wrote:


I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting
for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina.

People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast
enough to qualify as disaster relief.



It took the House 10 days to past a bill that started recovery funds
flowing to Katrinaville.


Mitch is saying they may have promised that money but it isn't all
there yet.

I haven't looked at Thomas yet but if Scotty is right and they
attached the $60 million "Sandy" bill to a $500 million dollar pork
fest, I agree, try again.

That is one reason we are $16 trillion in debt. You can't pass a bill
in congress without a pork barrel bribe for every yes vote.


Seriously... The only folks who refute any facts I state here are....
well, there are none, just name callers... Do the homework if you
want, I don't make up numbers or throw up phony arguments, that is for
loogie, krause, and jps..

Really? I refute the above facts, please give cite. How's that?

On 1/3/2013 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:45:27 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

On 1/3/2013 7:00 PM, wrote:

I haven't looked at Thomas yet but if Scotty is right and they
attached the $60 million "Sandy" bill to a $500 million dollar pork
fest, I agree, try again.

That is one reason we are $16 trillion in debt. You can't pass a bill
in congress without a pork barrel bribe for every yes vote.


Seriously... The only folks who refute any facts I state here are....
well, there are none, just name callers... Do the homework if you
want, I don't make up numbers or throw up phony arguments, that is for
loogie, krause, and jps..

I have looked it up and the bill is a lot worse than you reported.

It was a bucket that sat around the Senate since February 28
collecting pork and they dug it up in late December, pasted the Sandy
relief on it and sent it back to the house on 12/30 hoping nobody
would have time to read it..


Well, I was just pointing out the tip of the iceberg. Fact is, nearly
65% of the money won't even get spent for up to ten years... It's not
Sandy Relief at all...

In article , says...

On 1/3/2013 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:45:27 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

On 1/3/2013 7:00 PM, wrote:

I haven't looked at Thomas yet but if Scotty is right and they
attached the $60 million "Sandy" bill to a $500 million dollar pork
fest, I agree, try again.

That is one reason we are $16 trillion in debt. You can't pass a bill
in congress without a pork barrel bribe for every yes vote.


Seriously... The only folks who refute any facts I state here are....
well, there are none, just name callers... Do the homework if you
want, I don't make up numbers or throw up phony arguments, that is for
loogie, krause, and jps..

I have looked it up and the bill is a lot worse than you reported.

It was a bucket that sat around the Senate since February 28
collecting pork and they dug it up in late December, pasted the Sandy
relief on it and sent it back to the house on 12/30 hoping nobody
would have time to read it..


Well, I was just pointing out the tip of the iceberg. Fact is, nearly
65% of the money won't even get spent for up to ten years... It's not
Sandy Relief at all...

Cite?

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:45:27 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

On 1/3/2013 7:00 PM, wrote:

I haven't looked at Thomas yet but if Scotty is right and they
attached the $60 million "Sandy" bill to a $500 million dollar pork
fest, I agree, try again.

That is one reason we are $16 trillion in debt. You can't pass a bill
in congress without a pork barrel bribe for every yes vote.


Seriously... The only folks who refute any facts I state here are....
well, there are none, just name callers... Do the homework if you
want, I don't make up numbers or throw up phony arguments, that is for
loogie, krause, and jps..

I have looked it up and the bill is a lot worse than you reported.

It was a bucket that sat around the Senate since February 28
collecting pork and they dug it up in late December, pasted the Sandy
relief on it and sent it back to the house on 12/30 hoping nobody
would have time to read it..

Cite?

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:15:18 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/3/13 12:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid-
hurricane-sandy-victims


Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork,
it might have had a better chance.

We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt
and kicked the can 2 months down the road.
When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is
buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of
thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is.




More likely, the House Repugnants were showing the people of a "Blue
State" that they really didn't give a **** about them.

I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting
for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina.

People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast
enough to qualify as disaster relief.

Yeah, especially when you have a dictator like Boehner who wouldn't even
let the House vote on relief.

On 1/3/2013 3:30 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:15:18 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/3/13 12:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid-
hurricane-sandy-victims


Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork,
it might have had a better chance.

We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt
and kicked the can 2 months down the road.
When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is
buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of
thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is.




More likely, the House Repugnants were showing the people of a "Blue
State" that they really didn't give a **** about them.

I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting
for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina.

People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast
enough to qualify as disaster relief.


The guy you folks helped here is engaged to a banker from NYC... She is
so frustrated talking on another group about how the FEMA money is in
the banks, but not being released by the Insurance Companies...

In article , says...

On 1/3/2013 3:30 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:15:18 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/3/13 12:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid-
hurricane-sandy-victims


Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork,
it might have had a better chance.

We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt
and kicked the can 2 months down the road.
When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is
buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of
thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is.




More likely, the House Repugnants were showing the people of a "Blue
State" that they really didn't give a **** about them.

I just saw Mitch Landreu (Gov Louisiana) saying he is still waiting
for the rest of his FEMA money from Katrina.

People are fools thinking the federal government can do anything fast
enough to qualify as disaster relief.


The guy you folks helped here is engaged to a banker from NYC... She is
so frustrated talking on another group about how the FEMA money is in
the banks, but not being released by the Insurance Companies...

Yeah, sure. Right. Liar.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:29:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


http://www.leftaction.com/action/tel...-disaster-aid-
hurricane-sandy-victims


Maybe if the senate had not loaded this bill up with unrelated pork,
it might have had a better chance.

Cite?


We didn't even attack the deficit with the cliff bill. They added debt
and kicked the can 2 months down the road.
When will the world simply stop buying our bonds? The treasury is
buying back 80% of the new issues now using money they create out of
thin air. That shows how soft the market in our paper actually is.

This has NOTHING to do with Boehner's not even letting the House vote on
the bill, after promising Christie relief. He's a friggin' pig and
should have never been elected to head the house.