Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #131   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,370
Default What the 'ell??

On 1/2/13 8:15 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:15:03 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/2/13 4:51 PM,
wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:15:35 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/2/13 3:10 PM,
wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:32:30 -0500, ESAD wrote:

no
possession of mags or clips that can hold more than 10 rounds, with a
180 day turn in period for such items.

How much "just compensation" will the government be offering ... or
are we tossing out the 5th amendment too?


Something fair could be worked out. CDNN is selling hi-cap mags for
rifle for around $20 to $30.

That might be a reasonable idea. How many do you think would get
turned in? If the street price was closer to $50 or $100, guess where
most would end up?

If you did have the feds registering all of the guns and certifying
all of the shooters, do you think the anti gun people would get off
our backs or would it just be a prelude to confiscation?

For me it is not that big a deal. I own an NFA firearm so I have been
vetted by BATF and I have a CCW so state knows I have had education
and I carry a card.


If possession after a date certain were a felony with serious
consequences, such as, for example, a substantial fine and loss of one's
legal ability to own a firearm, then I suspect a lot will be turned in.


The law abiding people might turn them in but that is not who poses
the problem. I think you night even find a number of otherwise law
abiding people who would stuff a few under the insulation in the attic
or something, assuming the law would be repealed or simply ruled
against in court.



I think the public is tiring of the "Nothing will work, so let's do
nothing" response.
  #133   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default What the 'ell??

On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:47:36 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

I highly doubt you know many "good law abiding folks".....


===

Don, just as a point of curiosity, why go out of your way to start yet
another ****ing contest?

  #135   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,107
Default What the 'ell??

On 1/3/2013 12:15 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:47:36 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

I highly doubt you know many "good law abiding folks".....


===

Don, just as a point of curiosity, why go out of your way to start yet
another ****ing contest?

Because that's what he does. It's his way of polishing Harry's apple.


  #138   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default What the 'ell??

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:15:03 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/2/13 4:51 PM,
wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:15:35 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/2/13 3:10 PM,
wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:32:30 -0500, ESAD wrote:

no
possession of mags or clips that can hold more than 10 rounds, with a
180 day turn in period for such items.

How much "just compensation" will the government be offering ... or
are we tossing out the 5th amendment too?


Something fair could be worked out. CDNN is selling hi-cap mags for
rifle for around $20 to $30.

That might be a reasonable idea. How many do you think would get
turned in? If the street price was closer to $50 or $100, guess where
most would end up?

If you did have the feds registering all of the guns and certifying
all of the shooters, do you think the anti gun people would get off
our backs or would it just be a prelude to confiscation?

For me it is not that big a deal. I own an NFA firearm so I have been
vetted by BATF and I have a CCW so state knows I have had education
and I carry a card.


If possession after a date certain were a felony with serious
consequences, such as, for example, a substantial fine and loss of one's
legal ability to own a firearm, then I suspect a lot will be turned in.


The law abiding people might turn them in but that is not who poses
the problem. I think you night even find a number of otherwise law
abiding people who would stuff a few under the insulation in the attic
or something, assuming the law would be repealed or simply ruled
against in court.


They would get the illegal ones off of the street after a fashion by
attrition.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What the 'ell! Don White General 33 May 5th 09 02:13 PM
What the 'ell is goin' on in Connecticut? Don White General 11 December 20th 07 12:13 PM
W'ell all need thicker foul weather jackets Ellen MacArthur ASA 18 September 25th 06 09:34 PM
W'ell all need thicker foul weather jackets John W. Bienko ASA 1 September 24th 06 03:56 PM
O/T - US going to *ell in a handbasket! Don White General 5 September 11th 04 10:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017