In article , says...

On 12/30/2012 7:56 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:36:43 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/30/12 6:52 PM, wrote:
Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there...
http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html

It'll be interesting to see what happens when the first sort of trained
teacher ends up shooting a kid "by sccident."

Hey, this is the United States. Rather than deal with the issues, we arm
teacher.

We arm everybody that is truly expected to protect and defend. Now,
that responsibility falls to those people acting in loco parentis.

Deal with the issues? There is no squishy idealism debate of issues.
This is about crazy armed people looking for a soft underbelly and
finding it among unprotected children. This isn't necessarily about
guns, either. Other countries are having the same problem with crazies
employing knives, machetes, and hatchets to eviscerate and hack off
school children's body parts.

It is already legal for teachers in Utah to carry. I applaud them for
seeking further training in pursuit of protect the children and fellow
employees.


"Issues", **** that. the only issue to address is the crazy mother with
the gun and the best way to "deal" with that issue, is with somebody who
is not crazy, with a gun... If a teacher goes nuts what makes anybody
think they will wait till it's legal for them to carry? Oh right, this
is progressives making a point, there is only one side for them.

You are ASSuming that the teacher(s) carrying the gun is mentally
stable, when in fact the teacher(s) could be just as "crazy" (to use a
low life term) as the shooters. Do you automatically think that because
someone is a teacher that they are mentally stable?