|
What the 'ell??
|
What the 'ell??
|
What the 'ell??
On 1/3/2013 12:15 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:47:36 -0800 (PST), wrote: I highly doubt you know many "good law abiding folks"..... === Don, just as a point of curiosity, why go out of your way to start yet another ****ing contest? Cause the miserable old **** has as little to look forward to in life as his butt buddy... He comes here every day for attention. |
What the 'ell??
On 1/3/2013 12:15 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:47:36 -0800 (PST), wrote: I highly doubt you know many "good law abiding folks"..... === Don, just as a point of curiosity, why go out of your way to start yet another ****ing contest? Because that's what he does. It's his way of polishing Harry's apple. |
What the 'ell??
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 1:15:28 AM UTC-4, Wayne. B wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:47:36 -0800 (PST), wrote: I highly doubt you know many "good law abiding folks"..... === Don, just as a point of curiosity, why go out of your way to start yet another ****ing contest? It's winter, minus 13 C , the boat is undercover in the driveway another 4 or 5 months so I'd like to do something that might be considered a public service. |
What the 'ell??
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 2:40:32 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 1/3/2013 12:15 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:47:36 -0800 (PST), wrote: I highly doubt you know many "good law abiding folks"..... === Don, just as a point of curiosity, why go out of your way to start yet another ****ing contest? Cause the miserable old **** has as little to look forward to in life as his butt buddy... He comes here every day for attention. On a national news program this am, I saw a flying superman figure that was remotely controlled. The thing seemed lifesized. Maybe you can order a Peter Pan or Tinkerbell version. |
What the 'ell??
In article ,
says... On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:15:03 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/2/13 4:51 PM, wrote: On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:15:35 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/2/13 3:10 PM, wrote: On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:32:30 -0500, ESAD wrote: no possession of mags or clips that can hold more than 10 rounds, with a 180 day turn in period for such items. How much "just compensation" will the government be offering ... or are we tossing out the 5th amendment too? Something fair could be worked out. CDNN is selling hi-cap mags for rifle for around $20 to $30. That might be a reasonable idea. How many do you think would get turned in? If the street price was closer to $50 or $100, guess where most would end up? If you did have the feds registering all of the guns and certifying all of the shooters, do you think the anti gun people would get off our backs or would it just be a prelude to confiscation? For me it is not that big a deal. I own an NFA firearm so I have been vetted by BATF and I have a CCW so state knows I have had education and I carry a card. If possession after a date certain were a felony with serious consequences, such as, for example, a substantial fine and loss of one's legal ability to own a firearm, then I suspect a lot will be turned in. The law abiding people might turn them in but that is not who poses the problem. I think you night even find a number of otherwise law abiding people who would stuff a few under the insulation in the attic or something, assuming the law would be repealed or simply ruled against in court. They would get the illegal ones off of the street after a fashion by attrition. |
What the 'ell??
|
What the 'ell??
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 04:29:12 -0800 (PST),
wrote: It's winter, minus 13 C , the boat is undercover in the driveway another 4 or 5 months so I'd like to do something that might be considered a public service. ====== How about posting some pictures of the winter scenery or some big surf along the coast? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com