On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 21:16:24 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/22/12 9:12 PM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 22, 7:56 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 12/22/12 8:48 PM, Tim wrote:

On Dec 22, 7:41 pm, ESAD wrote:

Yes, if you hold those views...you are ignorant.

I do.

Thank you

?;^ )

You believe that man and dinosaurs walked the earth at the same time,
and that the earth is only a few thousand years old?

Actually I believe that the earth can be much, much older than that.
and I do believe that it is possible that man was around with dino's.

Still are too. Look at alligators, crocs, lizards and snakes.


Dinosaurs were not lizards. Birds may have evolved from dinosaurs.

ESAD, I'm surprised Tim didn't tell you to ESAD!

On 12/23/12 10:29 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 21:16:24 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/22/12 9:12 PM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 22, 7:56 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 12/22/12 8:48 PM, Tim wrote:

On Dec 22, 7:41 pm, ESAD wrote:

Yes, if you hold those views...you are ignorant.

I do.

Thank you

?;^ )

You believe that man and dinosaurs walked the earth at the same time,
and that the earth is only a few thousand years old?

Actually I believe that the earth can be much, much older than that.
and I do believe that it is possible that man was around with dino's.

Still are too. Look at alligators, crocs, lizards and snakes.


Dinosaurs were not lizards. Birds may have evolved from dinosaurs.

ESAD, I'm surprised Tim didn't tell you to ESAD!


For pointing out that dinos were not lizards? Pshaw.

Believing that man and dinosaur were contemporaneous is absurd.

Believing in "creationism" as anything beyond a religious belief is also
absurd.

On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:41:01 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/23/12 10:29 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 21:16:24 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/22/12 9:12 PM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 22, 7:56 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 12/22/12 8:48 PM, Tim wrote:

On Dec 22, 7:41 pm, ESAD wrote:

Yes, if you hold those views...you are ignorant.

I do.

Thank you

?;^ )

You believe that man and dinosaurs walked the earth at the same time,
and that the earth is only a few thousand years old?

Actually I believe that the earth can be much, much older than that.
and I do believe that it is possible that man was around with dino's.

Still are too. Look at alligators, crocs, lizards and snakes.


Dinosaurs were not lizards. Birds may have evolved from dinosaurs.

ESAD, I'm surprised Tim didn't tell you to ESAD!


For pointing out that dinos were not lizards? Pshaw.

Believing that man and dinosaur were contemporaneous is absurd.

Believing in "creationism" as anything beyond a religious belief is also
absurd.

No, ESAD, just for being you.

On 12/23/2012 11:24 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:41:01 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/23/12 10:29 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 21:16:24 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 12/22/12 9:12 PM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 22, 7:56 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 12/22/12 8:48 PM, Tim wrote:

On Dec 22, 7:41 pm, ESAD wrote:

Yes, if you hold those views...you are ignorant.

I do.

Thank you

?;^ )

You believe that man and dinosaurs walked the earth at the same time,
and that the earth is only a few thousand years old?

Actually I believe that the earth can be much, much older than that.
and I do believe that it is possible that man was around with dino's.

Still are too. Look at alligators, crocs, lizards and snakes.


Dinosaurs were not lizards. Birds may have evolved from dinosaurs.

ESAD, I'm surprised Tim didn't tell you to ESAD!


For pointing out that dinos were not lizards? Pshaw.

Believing that man and dinosaur were contemporaneous is absurd.

Believing in "creationism" as anything beyond a religious belief is also
absurd.

No, ESAD, just for being you.

I'll second that.

On Dec 22, 8:16*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 12/22/12 9:12 PM, Tim wrote:









On Dec 22, 7:56 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 12/22/12 8:48 PM, Tim wrote:

On Dec 22, 7:41 pm, ESAD wrote:

* *Yes, if you hold those views...you are ignorant.

I do.

Thank you

?;^ )

You believe that man and dinosaurs walked the earth at the same time,
and that the earth is only a few thousand years old?

Actually I believe that the earth can be much, much older than that.
and I do believe that it is possible that man was around with dino's.

Still are too. Look at alligators, crocs, lizards and snakes.

Dinosaurs were not lizards. Birds may have evolved from dinosaurs.

OK, so what constitutes the definition of a 'dinosaur' ? What is an
"assault rifle"

From what I understand about dino's they were cold blooded animals
like, lizards, crocs and snakes.

and a gun is a gun.

On 12/23/2012 2:13 PM, Tim wrote:

From what I understand about dino's they were cold blooded animals
like, lizards, crocs and snakes.

http://phys.org/news177138663.html

On Dec 23, 5:47*pm, ESAD wrote:


and sauros (“reptile” or “lizard”).

ok

On Dec 23, 6:05*pm, thumper wrote:
On 12/23/2012 2:13 PM, Tim wrote:

* From what I understand about dino's they were cold blooded animals
like, lizards, crocs and snakes.

http://phys.org/news177138663.html

Thanks very much for the link, but I noticed that there was the word
"probably"

Which to me doesn't mean 'chiseled in stone' But I'm discounting the
idea that some wern't

On 12/23/2012 8:32 PM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 23, 6:05 pm, thumper wrote:
On 12/23/2012 2:13 PM, Tim wrote:

From what I understand about dino's they were cold blooded animals
like, lizards, crocs and snakes.

http://phys.org/news177138663.html

Thanks very much for the link, but I noticed that there was the word
"probably"

Which to me doesn't mean 'chiseled in stone' But I'm discounting the
idea that some wern't


There is still debate as the evidence is pretty sparse as you can
imagine. That's how science works, nothing gets chiseled in stone.

On 12/23/2012 7:05 PM, thumper wrote:
On 12/23/2012 2:13 PM, Tim wrote:

From what I understand about dino's they were cold blooded animals
like, lizards, crocs and snakes.

http://phys.org/news177138663.html


So they were democrat... makes sense.