On 12/18/12 7:02 PM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 18, 5:22 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 12/18/12 5:49 PM, Tim wrote:









On Dec 18, 8:38 am, ESAD wrote:
... a terrorist organization?

Wikipedia has a handful of scholarly or semi-scholarly definitions of
terrorism. One of these states that a terrorist organization:

is ineluctably political in aims and motives

is violent or, equally important, threatens violence (uh, like "cold,
dead hands?")

is designed to have far-reaching psychological repercussions beyond the
immediate victim or target

is conducted by an organization with an identifiable chain of command or
conspiratorial cell structure (whose members wear no uniform or
identifying insignia) and perpetrated by a subnational group or
non-state entity.

nope.

Sounds like the NRA to me.

maybe so, but you could say the same about any organization, Harry.
And that includes most Corporations as well as Unions.

Well, we shall see what happens. The only bright spots the last few days
have been the insane comments by the lunatic from the Gun Owners of
America and, of course, that loon, Mike Huckabee.

Well, Huck's statement o Facebook has gotten his thousands of 'likes'
hundreds of 'shares' and less than 1500 comments - mostly seething.

But speaking of loons. Take the article for what one will, but I'm
sure the tweets are real-

http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/12/li...comment-133694



Uh-huh. Please let me know when a "liberal" as prominent as Huckabee, a
former candidate for the U.S. presidency, a former governor and a
preacher with a TV show, calls for the assassination of the NRA leader.
It's no surprise that Huckabee's idiotic claim has received thousands of
"likes" from like-minded morons.

BTW, did I miss your comment after I posted the article about the new
U.S. Senator from SC calling for a statue to be erected to memorialize
aborted fetuses?

On 12/18/2012 7:08 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 12/18/12 7:02 PM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 18, 5:22 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 12/18/12 5:49 PM, Tim wrote:









On Dec 18, 8:38 am, ESAD wrote:
... a terrorist organization?

Wikipedia has a handful of scholarly or semi-scholarly definitions of
terrorism. One of these states that a terrorist organization:

is ineluctably political in aims and motives

is violent or, equally important, threatens violence (uh, like "cold,
dead hands?")

is designed to have far-reaching psychological repercussions beyond
the
immediate victim or target

is conducted by an organization with an identifiable chain of
command or
conspiratorial cell structure (whose members wear no uniform or
identifying insignia) and perpetrated by a subnational group or
non-state entity.

nope.

Sounds like the NRA to me.

maybe so, but you could say the same about any organization, Harry.
And that includes most Corporations as well as Unions.

Well, we shall see what happens. The only bright spots the last few days
have been the insane comments by the lunatic from the Gun Owners of
America and, of course, that loon, Mike Huckabee.

Well, Huck's statement o Facebook has gotten his thousands of 'likes'
hundreds of 'shares' and less than 1500 comments - mostly seething.

But speaking of loons. Take the article for what one will, but I'm
sure the tweets are real-

http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/12/li...comment-133694




Uh-huh. Please let me know when a "liberal" as prominent as Huckabee, a
former candidate for the U.S. presidency, a former governor and a
preacher with a TV show, calls for the assassination of the NRA leader.

You had a Wisconsin elected lawmaker call for blood the other day, hours
before the spermburper attacked the tents and reporters...


It's no surprise that Huckabee's idiotic claim has received thousands of
"likes" from like-minded morons.

BTW, did I miss your comment after I posted the article about the new
U.S. Senator from SC calling for a statue to be erected to memorialize
aborted fetuses?

In article , says...

On 12/18/2012 7:08 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 12/18/12 7:02 PM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 18, 5:22 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 12/18/12 5:49 PM, Tim wrote:









On Dec 18, 8:38 am, ESAD wrote:
... a terrorist organization?

Wikipedia has a handful of scholarly or semi-scholarly definitions of
terrorism. One of these states that a terrorist organization:

is ineluctably political in aims and motives

is violent or, equally important, threatens violence (uh, like "cold,
dead hands?")

is designed to have far-reaching psychological repercussions beyond
the
immediate victim or target

is conducted by an organization with an identifiable chain of
command or
conspiratorial cell structure (whose members wear no uniform or
identifying insignia) and perpetrated by a subnational group or
non-state entity.

nope.

Sounds like the NRA to me.

maybe so, but you could say the same about any organization, Harry.
And that includes most Corporations as well as Unions.

Well, we shall see what happens. The only bright spots the last few days
have been the insane comments by the lunatic from the Gun Owners of
America and, of course, that loon, Mike Huckabee.

Well, Huck's statement o Facebook has gotten his thousands of 'likes'
hundreds of 'shares' and less than 1500 comments - mostly seething.

But speaking of loons. Take the article for what one will, but I'm
sure the tweets are real-

http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/12/li...comment-133694




Uh-huh. Please let me know when a "liberal" as prominent as Huckabee, a
former candidate for the U.S. presidency, a former governor and a
preacher with a TV show, calls for the assassination of the NRA leader.

You had a Wisconsin elected lawmaker call for blood the other day, hours
before the spermburper attacked the tents and reporters...


Huh?

On Dec 18, 6:08*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 12/18/12 7:02 PM, Tim wrote:









On Dec 18, 5:22 pm, ESAD wrote:
On 12/18/12 5:49 PM, Tim wrote:

On Dec 18, 8:38 am, ESAD wrote:
... a terrorist organization?

Wikipedia has a handful of scholarly or semi-scholarly definitions of
terrorism. One of these states that a terrorist organization:

is ineluctably political in aims and motives

is violent or, equally important, threatens violence (uh, like "cold,
dead hands?")

is designed to have far-reaching psychological repercussions beyond the
immediate victim or target

is conducted by an organization with an identifiable chain of command or
conspiratorial cell structure (whose members wear no uniform or
identifying insignia) and perpetrated by a subnational group or
non-state entity.

nope.

Sounds like the NRA to me.

maybe so, but you could say the same about any organization, Harry.
And that includes most Corporations as well as Unions.

Well, we shall see what happens. The only bright spots the last few days
have been the insane comments by the lunatic from the Gun Owners of
America and, of course, that loon, Mike Huckabee.

Well, Huck's statement o Facebook has gotten his thousands of 'likes'
hundreds of 'shares' and less than 1500 comments - mostly seething.

But speaking of loons. Take the article for what one will, but I'm
sure the tweets are real-

http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/12/li...der-of-nra-pre...

Uh-huh. Please let me know when a "liberal" as prominent as Huckabee, a
former candidate for the U.S. presidency, a former governor and a
preacher with a TV show, calls for the assassination of the NRA leader.

Did Huck promote an assassination?

It's no surprise that Huckabee's idiotic claim has received thousands of
"likes" from like-minded morons.

Th e point is, that on Facebook, he's more liked than not.


BTW, did I miss your comment after I posted the article about the new
U.S. Senator from SC calling for a statue to be erected to memorialize
aborted fetuses?

I haven't seen it. I dont' get around to ALL the replies in here. On
GoogleGroups there's a lot of threads with a lot of comments and I
don't get e-mail notes on threads I've posted to. I'll get there
eventually.

On 12/18/2012 7:00 PM, Tim wrote:

Th e point is, that on Facebook, he's more liked than not.

By the self-selected group of followers.

On Dec 19, 12:52*am, thumper wrote:
On 12/18/2012 7:00 PM, Tim wrote:

Th e point is, that on Facebook, he's more liked than not.

By the self-selected group of followers.

I may be wrong, but I believe his page is public

http://www.facebook.com/mikehuckabee?ref=ts&fref=ts

On 12/19/12 4:31 AM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 19, 12:52 am, thumper wrote:
On 12/18/2012 7:00 PM, Tim wrote:

Th e point is, that on Facebook, he's more liked than not.

By the self-selected group of followers.

I may be wrong, but I believe his page is public

http://www.facebook.com/mikehuckabee?ref=ts&fref=ts


Who said there was a shortage of simple-minded followers for demagogues
like Huckster Huckabee?

On Dec 19, 5:32*am, ESAD wrote:
On 12/19/12 4:31 AM, Tim wrote:

On Dec 19, 12:52 am, thumper wrote:
On 12/18/2012 7:00 PM, Tim wrote:

Th e point is, that on Facebook, he's more liked than not.

By the self-selected group of followers.

I may be wrong, but I believe his page is public

http://www.facebook.com/mikehuckabee?ref=ts&fref=ts

Who said there was a shortage of simple-minded followers for demagogues
like Huckster Huckabee?

I won't be, Harry, but there's plenty that you could say the same
about our president, too

On 12/19/12 7:50 AM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 19, 5:32 am, ESAD wrote:
On 12/19/12 4:31 AM, Tim wrote:

On Dec 19, 12:52 am, thumper wrote:
On 12/18/2012 7:00 PM, Tim wrote:

Th e point is, that on Facebook, he's more liked than not.

By the self-selected group of followers.

I may be wrong, but I believe his page is public

http://www.facebook.com/mikehuckabee?ref=ts&fref=ts

Who said there was a shortage of simple-minded followers for demagogues
like Huckster Huckabee?

I won't be, Harry, but there's plenty that you could say the same
about our president, too


Every politician has dumb followers, but I don't see any of the
president's followers as dumb as those who "follow" a man whose entire
premise is based upon ignorance and superstition and who says things
like the cause of the shootings was the lack of god and religion in the
public schools. There is none of that moral equivalency here. Huckabee
is a huckster and charlatan.

On 12/19/2012 1:31 AM, Tim wrote:
On Dec 19, 12:52 am, thumper wrote:
On 12/18/2012 7:00 PM, Tim wrote:

Th e point is, that on Facebook, he's more liked than not.

By the self-selected group of followers.

I may be wrong, but I believe his page is public

http://www.facebook.com/mikehuckabee?ref=ts&fref=ts


And the followers are a self selected group that 'like' him more than
not... not a surprise.