In article ,
says...

On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:23:59 PM UTC-5, ESAD wrote:


Costas is at the top of his game. From wiki:

Costas has won eight National Sportcaster of the Year awards...

"game" was a very important word. Costas is a SPORTS announcer.

Just like the hollywood liberal airheads, he can't tell **** from shineola when it comes to the real world.

But Rush does, eh?

On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule

wrote:



Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'.



===



That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to
hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values
as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with
conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't
correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the
ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be
mistaken for lack of values.

I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG.

On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:39:37 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:23:59 PM UTC-5, ESAD wrote:





Costas is at the top of his game. From wiki:



Costas has won eight National Sportcaster of the Year awards...



"game" was a very important word. Costas is a SPORTS announcer.



Just like the hollywood liberal airheads, he can't tell **** from shineola when it comes to the real world.



But Rush does, eh?

I don't know. *You* listen to him, not me.

On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:16:26 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule
wrote:

Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'.

===

That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to
hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values
as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with
conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't
correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the
ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be
mistaken for lack of values.

It's a shame that some of those value oriented liberals you know aren't in politics or on judicial
benches (whoops, those are the same thing for liberals).

I suppose the big difference lies in how we define 'values'. I would imagine that my definition
would be much different than that of Krause, jps, Kevin, et al.

This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the
drift.

http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy

Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last.

On 12/5/12 11:03 AM, GuzzisRule wrote:

I suppose the big difference lies in how we define 'values'. I would imagine that my definition
would be much different than that of Krause, jps, Kevin, et al.

How did those racist positions of you and your party work out for you in
the last election?

In article ,
says...

On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule

wrote:



Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'.



===



That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to
hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values
as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with
conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't
correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the
ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be
mistaken for lack of values.

I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG.

Cite?

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:39:37 AM UTC-5, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:23:59 PM UTC-5, ESAD wrote:





Costas is at the top of his game. From wiki:



Costas has won eight National Sportcaster of the Year awards...



"game" was a very important word. Costas is a SPORTS announcer.



Just like the hollywood liberal airheads, he can't tell **** from shineola when it comes to the real world.



But Rush does, eh?

I don't know. *You* listen to him, not me.

That's odd, you sure use a lot of his very talking points.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:16:26 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule
wrote:

Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'.

===

That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to
hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values
as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with
conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't
correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the
ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be
mistaken for lack of values.

It's a shame that some of those value oriented liberals you know aren't in politics or on judicial
benches (whoops, those are the same thing for liberals).

I suppose the big difference lies in how we define 'values'. I would imagine that my definition
would be much different than that of Krause, jps, Kevin, et al.

This article sums it up pretty well. Of course, I didn't write it, but hopefully you'll get the
drift.

http://tinyurl.com/a3a6gfy

Sorry you're disappointed, but it's not the first time and probably won't be the last.

A human couldn't possibly be more narrow minded than you.

On 12/5/12 11:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule

wrote:



Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'.



===



That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to
hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values
as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with
conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't
correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the
ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be
mistaken for lack of values.

I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG.

Cite?



I'm not aware of any "ultra liberals" in this newsgroup, now or at any
time in the past.

On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 1:17:02 PM UTC-5, ESAD wrote:

In article ,

says...

On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:16:26 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote:

On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:11:55 -0500, GuzzisRule
wrote:


Values are not high on the list of most liberal's 'values'.

===

That's a little wide of the mark in my opinion and I'm disappointed to
hear you say it. I've known many liberal minded people with values
as good as any you could hope to find, others not so much. Same with
conservatives. My point is that values and political leaning don't
correlate very well in my experience except maybe in the eyes of the
ultra conservative media. Differences of opinion should not be
mistaken for lack of values.

I'm a bit dissapointed in you, Wayne. It's not just the "ultra conservative" media's eye that hold that view, it's rampant in the ultra liberal view as well. And is alive and well right here in this NG.


I'm not aware of any "ultra liberals" in this newsgroup, now or at any
time in the past.


Not very self aware, are you? Nothing seems left when you're looking from the far left.

But you may be right... many mainstream liberals also seem to hold that view.

Have you paid your taxes and debts, deadbeat?