On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:44:52 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

This guy didn't do anything to try to resolve the situation, he baited
the kids in to a murder.

===

That's not the way that I read the story. If my memory is correct,
the kids broke a window to get into the house, and the sound of
breaking glass woke him up. One of them started to come down the
stairs into the room where he was. Being concerned that they were
armed, he shot first, several times. Where he went wrong was
delivering a final shot at close range after the original threat no
longer existed. He lives in a so called "Castle" state where shooting
an intruder in your home is permitted if you feel threatened. You are
not permitted to fire "execution" shots however, and of course the
police should have been notified immediately. It's quite likely that
he suffers from some sort of mental impairment.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:44:52 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

This guy didn't do anything to try to resolve the situation, he baited
the kids in to a murder.

===

That's not the way that I read the story. If my memory is correct,
the kids broke a window to get into the house, and the sound of
breaking glass woke him up. One of them started to come down the
stairs into the room where he was. Being concerned that they were
armed, he shot first, several times. Where he went wrong was
delivering a final shot at close range after the original threat no
longer existed. He lives in a so called "Castle" state where shooting
an intruder in your home is permitted if you feel threatened. You are
not permitted to fire "execution" shots however, and of course the
police should have been notified immediately. It's quite likely that
he suffers from some sort of mental impairment.

Seriously, are you expecting Scotty to actually comprehend something and
not go on an insane rant?

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:44:52 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

This guy didn't do anything to try to resolve the situation, he baited
the kids in to a murder.

===

That's not the way that I read the story. If my memory is correct,
the kids broke a window to get into the house, and the sound of
breaking glass woke him up. One of them started to come down the
stairs into the room where he was. Being concerned that they were
armed, he shot first, several times. Where he went wrong was
delivering a final shot at close range after the original threat no
longer existed. He lives in a so called "Castle" state where shooting
an intruder in your home is permitted if you feel threatened. You are
not permitted to fire "execution" shots however, and of course the
police should have been notified immediately. It's quite likely that
he suffers from some sort of mental impairment.

Seriously, are you expecting Scotty to actually comprehend something and
not go on an insane rant?


----------------------

Probably about the same time you do also.

On 11/30/2012 12:41 AM, Califbill wrote:
"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:44:52 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

This guy didn't do anything to try to resolve the situation, he baited
the kids in to a murder.

===

That's not the way that I read the story.

Hey, I read it differently then, I read it with a "finishing" shot,
after the kid was already clearly down. I didn't read anything about the
homeowner yelling up the stairs he was armed and the intruder needed to
get out...

If my memory is correct,
the kids broke a window to get into the house, and the sound of
breaking glass woke him up. One of them started to come down the
stairs into the room where he was. Being concerned that they were
armed, he shot first, several times. Where he went wrong was
delivering a final shot at close range after the original threat no
longer existed. He lives in a so called "Castle" state where shooting
an intruder in your home is permitted if you feel threatened. You are
not permitted to fire "execution" shots however, and of course the
police should have been notified immediately. It's quite likely that
he suffers from some sort of mental impairment.

Seriously, are you expecting Scotty to actually comprehend something and
not go on an insane rant?

**** off Kevin, you frekin' pussy...


----------------------

Probably about the same time you do also.

Hey, it's the way I read it. Only saw one write up though and I have
been clear with all of my posts that I am not yet clear but "if it
happened the way I read it". All of you need to read better...

On 11/30/12 7:35 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...


On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:00:48 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

Hey, it's the way I read it. Only saw one write up though and I have
been clear with all of my posts that I am not yet clear but "if it
happened the way I read it". All of you need to read better...


I think is interesting that these good liberal folks have convicted
this guy without a word of testimony, a hearing or a trial, based on a
news story. I think that is what we call a lynch mob isn't it?

No. The news story, in the NY Times and elsewhere, is based on what the
police said, such as the man did not report to the police on the day of
the intrusion and murders because he did not want to disturb the cops'
holiday. Seems to me he has pretty much convicted himself unless the
papers are making it all up.



Fretwell thinks everyone has the right to shoot anyone he or she finds
offensive.

In article ,
says...

On 11/30/12 7:35 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...


On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:00:48 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

Hey, it's the way I read it. Only saw one write up though and I have
been clear with all of my posts that I am not yet clear but "if it
happened the way I read it". All of you need to read better...


I think is interesting that these good liberal folks have convicted
this guy without a word of testimony, a hearing or a trial, based on a
news story. I think that is what we call a lynch mob isn't it?

No. The news story, in the NY Times and elsewhere, is based on what the
police said, such as the man did not report to the police on the day of
the intrusion and murders because he did not want to disturb the cops'
holiday. Seems to me he has pretty much convicted himself unless the
papers are making it all up.



Fretwell thinks everyone has the right to shoot anyone he or she finds
offensive.

Do you suppose the IRS will show up at your door after you shoot someone
for the simple act of knocking on your door to sell you something?

"ESAD" wrote in message
m...

On 11/30/12 7:35 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...


On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:00:48 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

Hey, it's the way I read it. Only saw one write up though and I have
been clear with all of my posts that I am not yet clear but "if it
happened the way I read it". All of you need to read better...


I think is interesting that these good liberal folks have convicted
this guy without a word of testimony, a hearing or a trial, based on a
news story. I think that is what we call a lynch mob isn't it?

No. The news story, in the NY Times and elsewhere, is based on what the
police said, such as the man did not report to the police on the day of
the intrusion and murders because he did not want to disturb the cops'
holiday. Seems to me he has pretty much convicted himself unless the
papers are making it all up.



Fretwell thinks everyone has the right to shoot anyone he or she finds
offensive.


--------------------

No he doesn't and you know you exaggerated. He figures you can protect your
self against a home invasion. Which is what these two did. The guy went
overboard in the shooting department, but he still had a right to shoot
them. And some you may want to execute, so when they get out of jail, or
while awaiting trial his friends decide to make it impossible for you to
testify. Which is a big problem with gang affiliated bandits. Sort of like
the B movie it Charles Bronson. Forget the name. As to home invasion being
dangerous.
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/...on-4080653.php
Very upscale region. so not inner city crime.

ESAD wrote:
On 11/30/12 7:35 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...


On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:00:48 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

Hey, it's the way I read it. Only saw one write up though and I have
been clear with all of my posts that I am not yet clear but "if it
happened the way I read it". All of you need to read better...


I think is interesting that these good liberal folks have convicted
this guy without a word of testimony, a hearing or a trial, based on a
news story. I think that is what we call a lynch mob isn't it?

No. The news story, in the NY Times and elsewhere, is based on what the
police said, such as the man did not report to the police on the day of
the intrusion and murders because he did not want to disturb the cops'
holiday. Seems to me he has pretty much convicted himself unless the
papers are making it all up.



Fretwell thinks everyone has the right to shoot anyone he or she finds
offensive.
Krause thinks taxes are optional.

In article , earl18134
@hotmail.com says...

ESAD wrote:
On 11/30/12 7:35 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...


On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:00:48 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

Hey, it's the way I read it. Only saw one write up though and I have
been clear with all of my posts that I am not yet clear but "if it
happened the way I read it". All of you need to read better...


I think is interesting that these good liberal folks have convicted
this guy without a word of testimony, a hearing or a trial, based on a
news story. I think that is what we call a lynch mob isn't it?

No. The news story, in the NY Times and elsewhere, is based on what the
police said, such as the man did not report to the police on the day of
the intrusion and murders because he did not want to disturb the cops'
holiday. Seems to me he has pretty much convicted himself unless the
papers are making it all up.



Fretwell thinks everyone has the right to shoot anyone he or she finds
offensive.
Krause thinks taxes are optional.

Optional for him and mandatory for others.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 07:45:38 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 11/30/12 7:35 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...


On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:00:48 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

Hey, it's the way I read it. Only saw one write up though and I have
been clear with all of my posts that I am not yet clear but "if it
happened the way I read it". All of you need to read better...


I think is interesting that these good liberal folks have convicted
this guy without a word of testimony, a hearing or a trial, based on a
news story. I think that is what we call a lynch mob isn't it?

No. The news story, in the NY Times and elsewhere, is based on what the
police said, such as the man did not report to the police on the day of
the intrusion and murders because he did not want to disturb the cops'
holiday. Seems to me he has pretty much convicted himself unless the
papers are making it all up.



Fretwell thinks everyone has the right to shoot anyone he or she finds
offensive.

Harry I remember you talking about all the people you would shoot if
they were in your house.

The real issue here is due process. If this guy actually gets
convicted of all of the allegations, he should go to jail.

I suppose it really just depends on how good a lawyer he can afford.

Heck, it was worse than that, he said he'd shoot anyone who showed up at
his door unannounced!