|
No, this can't be true, the hard core righties say they don'twork!
On 11/5/2012 1:27 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:33:59 -0500, T. Keating wrote: Eventually EROEI on fossil fuels will drop so low, It won't even be worth looking for them. But, before that happens the extra CO2 we've put into the atmosphere will drive Earth's Biosphere into the major 6th extinction level event. That is exactly what needs to happen if you really want to cut CO2 levels. CO2 tracks population growth as closely as any other metric. If you want to get back to 1940 CO2 levels, you need to scrub about 5 billion people off the population. I imagine the upcoming thermonuclear war will do it. What thermonuclear war is that? The upcoming one, dummy. |
No, this can't be true, the hard core righties say they don't work!
In article om,
says... On 11/5/2012 11:35 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 21:42:35 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:41:01 -0500, BAR wrote: The leftists want us to stop using all fossil fuel which is not practicable. === Not yet practicable. Someday it will be a necessity for one reason or another, might as well prepare now to the extent possible. Our problem is that we use fossil fuel all of our packaging and it is critical to manufacturing. It doesn't matter, sooner or later, there will be no fossil fuel available at any price. You'll have to switch to some sort of bio-based packaging.. P.S.. The difference between living cells and thermally cracked ones(fossil fuels) is not that much of difference. (Need extra energy inputs to grow, collect bio-matter, and then crack them via pyrolysis. ). Eventually EROEI on fossil fuels will drop so low, It won't even be worth looking for them. But, before that happens the extra CO2 we've put into the atmosphere will drive Earth's Biosphere into the major 6th extinction level event. You can't explain science to people who get all of their information from FOX..... I rarely catch Fox news. Go ahead and explain science to me, nimrod. The 6th extinction follows the 5th. Also, as I've tried to tell the hard core right wingers here (and they don't get it) fossil fuel is a finite resource. |
No, this can't be true, the hard core righties say they don't work!
In article , says...
On 11/5/2012 11:33 AM, T. Keating wrote: On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 21:42:35 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:41:01 -0500, BAR wrote: The leftists want us to stop using all fossil fuel which is not practicable. === Not yet practicable. Someday it will be a necessity for one reason or another, might as well prepare now to the extent possible. Our problem is that we use fossil fuel all of our packaging and it is critical to manufacturing. It doesn't matter, sooner or later, there will be no fossil fuel available at any price. You'll have to switch to some sort of bio-based packaging.. P.S.. The difference between living cells and thermally cracked ones(fossil fuels) is not that much of difference. (Need extra energy inputs to grow, collect bio-matter, and then crack them via pyrolysis. ). Eventually EROEI on fossil fuels will drop so low, It won't even be worth looking for them. But, before that happens the extra CO2 we've put into the atmosphere will drive Earth's Biosphere into the major 6th extinction level event. Wow! Glad we have an expert here to clear all that up for us.. You had me till the expectation that we are gonna' sit around and wait for that to happen, just because we are sick of using "green" as an excuse to bankroll unions and DNC supporters... Damn you are stupid...... |
No, this can't be true, the hard core righties say they don't work!
In article om,
says... On 11/5/2012 12:21 PM, wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:33:59 -0500, T. Keating wrote: Eventually EROEI on fossil fuels will drop so low, It won't even be worth looking for them. But, before that happens the extra CO2 we've put into the atmosphere will drive Earth's Biosphere into the major 6th extinction level event. That is exactly what needs to happen if you really want to cut CO2 levels. CO2 tracks population growth as closely as any other metric. If you want to get back to 1940 CO2 levels, you need to scrub about 5 billion people off the population. I imagine the upcoming thermonuclear war will do it. An alternative would be to encourage people to stop exhaling. Did FOX tell you to blurt that stupid ****? |
No, this can't be true, the hard core righties say they don't work!
|
No, this can't be true, the hard core righties say they don'twork!
On 11/5/2012 1:56 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 11/5/2012 1:25 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/5/2012 11:35 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 21:42:35 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:41:01 -0500, BAR wrote: The leftists want us to stop using all fossil fuel which is not practicable. === Not yet practicable. Someday it will be a necessity for one reason or another, might as well prepare now to the extent possible. Our problem is that we use fossil fuel all of our packaging and it is critical to manufacturing. It doesn't matter, sooner or later, there will be no fossil fuel available at any price. You'll have to switch to some sort of bio-based packaging.. P.S.. The difference between living cells and thermally cracked ones(fossil fuels) is not that much of difference. (Need extra energy inputs to grow, collect bio-matter, and then crack them via pyrolysis. ). Eventually EROEI on fossil fuels will drop so low, It won't even be worth looking for them. But, before that happens the extra CO2 we've put into the atmosphere will drive Earth's Biosphere into the major 6th extinction level event. You can't explain science to people who get all of their information from FOX..... I rarely catch Fox news. Go ahead and explain science to me, nimrod. The 6th extinction follows the 5th. Also, as I've tried to tell the hard core right wingers here (and they don't get it) fossil fuel is a finite resource. As suspected. You can't explain what science is. Oh, I didn't realize that you didn't know what "science" as a whole is. Okay, so science is the the knowledge of dealing with facts in a systematic arrangement showing the operation of the laws of the physical or material world. Thanks for sharing. |
No, this can't be true, the hard core righties say they don'twork!
On 11/5/2012 12:41 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 11/5/2012 1:25 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/5/2012 11:35 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 21:42:35 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:41:01 -0500, BAR wrote: The leftists want us to stop using all fossil fuel which is not practicable. === Not yet practicable. Someday it will be a necessity for one reason or another, might as well prepare now to the extent possible. Our problem is that we use fossil fuel all of our packaging and it is critical to manufacturing. It doesn't matter, sooner or later, there will be no fossil fuel available at any price. You'll have to switch to some sort of bio-based packaging.. P.S.. The difference between living cells and thermally cracked ones(fossil fuels) is not that much of difference. (Need extra energy inputs to grow, collect bio-matter, and then crack them via pyrolysis. ). Eventually EROEI on fossil fuels will drop so low, It won't even be worth looking for them. But, before that happens the extra CO2 we've put into the atmosphere will drive Earth's Biosphere into the major 6th extinction level event. You can't explain science to people who get all of their information from FOX..... I rarely catch Fox news. Go ahead and explain science to me, nimrod. The 6th extinction follows the 5th. Also, as I've tried to tell the hard core right wingers here (and they don't get it) fossil fuel is a finite resource. As suspected. You can't explain what science is. And totally wasting our time with the suggestion that we don't know that the supply of fossil fuel is finite... It's just dopey, and he's only doing it as a distraction... |
No, this can't be true, the hard core righties say they don't work!
In article om,
says... On 11/5/2012 1:25 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/5/2012 11:35 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 21:42:35 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:41:01 -0500, BAR wrote: The leftists want us to stop using all fossil fuel which is not practicable. === Not yet practicable. Someday it will be a necessity for one reason or another, might as well prepare now to the extent possible. Our problem is that we use fossil fuel all of our packaging and it is critical to manufacturing. It doesn't matter, sooner or later, there will be no fossil fuel available at any price. You'll have to switch to some sort of bio-based packaging.. P.S.. The difference between living cells and thermally cracked ones(fossil fuels) is not that much of difference. (Need extra energy inputs to grow, collect bio-matter, and then crack them via pyrolysis. ). Eventually EROEI on fossil fuels will drop so low, It won't even be worth looking for them. But, before that happens the extra CO2 we've put into the atmosphere will drive Earth's Biosphere into the major 6th extinction level event. You can't explain science to people who get all of their information from FOX..... I rarely catch Fox news. Go ahead and explain science to me, nimrod. The 6th extinction follows the 5th. Also, as I've tried to tell the hard core right wingers here (and they don't get it) fossil fuel is a finite resource. As suspected. You can't explain what science is. Oh, I didn't realize that you didn't know what "science" as a whole is. Okay, so science is the the knowledge of dealing with facts in a systematic arrangement showing the operation of the laws of the physical or material world. |
No, this can't be true, the hard core righties say they don'twork!
On 11/5/2012 1:46 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 13:27:28 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:33:59 -0500, T. Keating wrote: Eventually EROEI on fossil fuels will drop so low, It won't even be worth looking for them. But, before that happens the extra CO2 we've put into the atmosphere will drive Earth's Biosphere into the major 6th extinction level event. That is exactly what needs to happen if you really want to cut CO2 levels. CO2 tracks population growth as closely as any other metric. If you want to get back to 1940 CO2 levels, you need to scrub about 5 billion people off the population. I imagine the upcoming thermonuclear war will do it. What thermonuclear war is that? The one that starts in Israel and expands until nobody is still able to shoot anymore. So, but "starting in Israel" you mean they will be the first ones turned to ashes by some Arab dickhead? Right? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com