| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Where is the media coverage?
JustWait wrote:
On 11/3/2012 11:31 AM, harry wrote: wrote: On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 10:26:05 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Exactly what is FEMA doing? http://blog.fema.gov/ Yup they are all over the place, having people fill out applications, showing picture IDs and other government red tape. "... to make an appointment to visit your property within 14 days after you apply. " Brownie got in trouble because FEMA was not in NOLA the next day with food, ice and water. Where is FEMA's food and water? Here? u u http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/2012...sing-residents Well, this will be the last post I see of yours because I know how you are, but I know real people down there, and the help is not there.. period... You do not know who I am. There is plenty of evidence FEMA. Is actively helping. Maybe you should stick with what you know which is making "PFFFFFT"lip farts. |
Where is the media coverage?
In article ,
says... wrote: On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 10:26:05 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Exactly what is FEMA doing? http://blog.fema.gov/ Yup they are all over the place, having people fill out applications, showing picture IDs and other government red tape. "... to make an appointment to visit your property within 14 days after you apply. " Brownie got in trouble because FEMA was not in NOLA the next day with food, ice and water. Where is FEMA's food and water? Here? http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/2012...sing-residents You are still a dead-beat and tax cheat. You will never be able to rehabilitate your compromised image. |
Where is the media coverage?
In article ,
says... On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 15:47:02 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:53:08 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 10:40:47 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://tinyurl.com/aad8ma4 Notice this part: There was little sign of a crime wave, although police made multiple arrests in the city Monday and Tuesday, officials said. Charges included burglary, criminal mischief and trespassing. In one incident, three men were arrested on burglary charges after they struck a Radio Shack in Rockaway Beach, Queens, on Tuesday morning. Bloomberg promised "a very heavy police presence" in the darkened neighborhoods, which include much of Manhattan south of the Empire State Building, from the East River to the Hudson River. Even outside the blackout areas, police deployed vans and patrol cars with their roof lights on, along with officers on the streets in a robust show of force. NOTHING like the debacle that was New Orleans. To start with the NYPD is not nearly as corrupt as the NOLA police was. This is true. But that was only part of the problem. True. The corruption started with the governor herself, and worked its way all down the line. So you don't think the robbers, killers, burglars, etc. had any hand in anything eh? That sounds very Harryesque. The NOLA police were some of the looters Swiping Cadillacs from dealerships as replacement patrol cars. |
Where is the media coverage?
On 11/3/2012 12:51 PM, harry wrote:
JustWait wrote: On 11/3/2012 11:31 AM, harry wrote: wrote: On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 10:26:05 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Exactly what is FEMA doing? http://blog.fema.gov/ Yup they are all over the place, having people fill out applications, showing picture IDs and other government red tape. "... to make an appointment to visit your property within 14 days after you apply. " Brownie got in trouble because FEMA was not in NOLA the next day with food, ice and water. Where is FEMA's food and water? Here? u u http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/2012...sing-residents Well, this will be the last post I see of yours because I know how you are, but I know real people down there, and the help is not there.. period... You do not know who I am. There is plenty of evidence FEMA. Is actively helping. Maybe you should stick with what you know which is making "PFFFFFT"lip farts. You are the lowest case harry. Check your union card if you doubt it. |
Where is the media coverage?
On 11/3/2012 1:25 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 10:26:05 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Exactly what is FEMA doing? http://blog.fema.gov/ Yup they are all over the place, having people fill out applications, showing picture IDs and other government red tape. "... to make an appointment to visit your property within 14 days after you apply. " Brownie got in trouble because FEMA was not in NOLA the next day with food, ice and water. Where is FEMA's food and water? How would you expedite having to visit the untold number of properties that are damaged by Sandy hitting a very densely populated area? How would you logistically do that when trees are down, roads and streets are covered in sand, no power, no water, etc.? Something like that doesn't fix itself instantaneously. What's FEMA's mandate? |
Where is the media coverage?
BAR wrote:
In article , says... wrote: On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 10:26:05 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Exactly what is FEMA doing? http://blog.fema.gov/ Yup they are all over the place, having people fill out applications, showing picture IDs and other government red tape. "... to make an appointment to visit your property within 14 days after you apply. " Brownie got in trouble because FEMA was not in NOLA the next day with food, ice and water. Where is FEMA's food and water? Here? http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/2012...sing-residents You are still a dead-beat and tax cheat. You will never be able to rehabilitate your compromised image. You are as funny as the "pffffft" guy -- Sent from my iPhone 5 |
Where is the media coverage?
On 11/3/2012 12:56 PM, BAR wrote:
To start with the NYPD is not nearly as corrupt as the NOLA police was. This is true. But that was only part of the problem. True. The corruption started with the governor herself, and worked its way all down the line. So you don't think the robbers, killers, burglars, etc. had any hand in anything eh? That sounds very Harryesque. The NOLA police were some of the looters Swiping Cadillacs from dealerships as replacement patrol cars. That was Bush's fault... |
Where is the media coverage?
wrote:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:04:10 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Bull**** The current FEMA rules are you can't build below sea level Yet they allowed them to do it there again, just setting the taxpayers up for another fall. You can talk about NOLA all you want. That was a levee failure. I'm talking about Sandy. Staten Island is above sea level, and no ****ing building code - except requiring stilting or concrete bunker construction - would have saved those buildings from the storm surge. And despite your saying "be prepared, because it happens all the time," the Sandy storm surge MADE HISTORY. http://seaandskyny.com/ So the bottom line is ANY community close to an ocean and not elevated sufficiently can suffer a disastrous storm surge. Or a Tsunami. Nobody will prepare for a +300 year event like you want them too. Florida codes don't protect from a strong cat 5, they just anticipate what's fairly common there. So your suggestion that Florida building codes be de rigueur elsewhere is flat wrong. The FEMA code is an elevation code. That water would go UNDER the house. They don't seem to be in Staten Island. What are they doing "all over the place", actually providing some kind of relief or just looking? Find out yourself. It's easy enough. Don't get all jacked up when you post non-fact and it gets challenged. BTW, FEMA is for when building codes don't work. Otherwise we wouldn't need it. I saw Harry say they were doing something for some people in lower Manhattan but the rest of the area seems to be forgotten. We could just huddle inside our bunkers until the storm passes. Yes that is exactly what you do, evacuate or hunker in the bunker. I'm not Harry. I am harry. I borrowed his handle. Truth is you have no idea how large an area isgetting help from FEMA. Our individual opinions are just that. Opinions. -- Sent from my iPhone 5 |
Where is the media coverage?
In article ,
says... On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 10:26:05 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Exactly what is FEMA doing? http://blog.fema.gov/ Yup they are all over the place, having people fill out applications, showing picture IDs and other government red tape. "... to make an appointment to visit your property within 14 days after you apply. " Brownie got in trouble because FEMA was not in NOLA the next day with food, ice and water. Where is FEMA's food and water? How would you expedite having to visit the untold number of properties that are damaged by Sandy hitting a very densely populated area? How would you logistically do that when trees are down, roads and streets are covered in sand, no power, no water, etc.? Something like that doesn't fix itself instantaneously. |
Where is the media coverage?
In article , says...
On 11/3/2012 11:31 AM, harry wrote: wrote: On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 10:26:05 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Exactly what is FEMA doing? http://blog.fema.gov/ Yup they are all over the place, having people fill out applications, showing picture IDs and other government red tape. "... to make an appointment to visit your property within 14 days after you apply. " Brownie got in trouble because FEMA was not in NOLA the next day with food, ice and water. Where is FEMA's food and water? Here? http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/2012...sing-residents Well, this will be the last post I see of yours because I know how you are, but I know real people down there, and the help is not there.. period... Bull****. http://tinyurl.com/d768dty http://tinyurl.com/bbeskaf http://tinyurl.com/cnttcoc |
Where is the media coverage?
In article , says...
On 11/3/2012 11:25 AM, wrote: On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 10:26:05 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Exactly what is FEMA doing? http://blog.fema.gov/ Yup they are all over the place, having people fill out applications, showing picture IDs and other government red tape. "... to make an appointment to visit your property within 14 days after you apply. " Brownie got in trouble because FEMA was not in NOLA the next day with food, ice and water. Where is FEMA's food and water? I know a lot of people down there and there is nothing... They are still walking too because of trees and wires. There are sections of the city where search and recovery efforts haven't even begun yet, the locals say the death toll is gonna' go up fast when the FD and FEMA get in there... You are full of **** or a liar, take your pick. I posted some URL's in reply to your previous post of bull****. |
Where is the media coverage?
|
Where is the media coverage?
In article , says...
On 11/3/2012 11:12 AM, wrote: On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 18:30:02 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... There are still a lot of parallels. You have an inadequate building code with houses that were not up to the weather and thousands of people who ignored the evacuation order. NOLA was levee failure. No code protects a house from 8 feet of rushing storm surge. Get used to it. Bull**** The current FEMA rules are you can't build below sea level Yet they allowed them to do it there again, just setting the taxpayers up for another fall. They also seemed to ignore the warnings about having several days of supplies and a hurricane kit with flashlights and other tools they need. Some guy was selling flashlights for $20. We also see FEMA still takes over a week to actually do anything of consequence in spite of white victims, 8 years of reforms and a democratic president. Storm came Tuesday. This is Friday. FEMA is all over the place. Learn to count, Mr Perfect. They don't seem to be in Staten Island. What are they doing "all over the place", actually providing some kind of relief or just looking? FEMA is nowhere.. I don't know one person who has actually found a truck yet.. They just keep getting the run around and waling from "false alarm" to false alarm and getting excuses... These folks are literally dehydrating from lack of food and water in some areas still. Again, you are a liar or just bat**** crazy. http://tinyurl.com/cnttcoc |
Where is the media coverage?
In article , says...
On 11/3/2012 12:04 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 18:30:02 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... There are still a lot of parallels. You have an inadequate building code with houses that were not up to the weather and thousands of people who ignored the evacuation order. NOLA was levee failure. No code protects a house from 8 feet of rushing storm surge. Get used to it. Bull**** The current FEMA rules are you can't build below sea level Yet they allowed them to do it there again, just setting the taxpayers up for another fall. You can talk about NOLA all you want. That was a levee failure. I'm talking about Sandy. Staten Island is above sea level, and no ****ing building code - except requiring stilting or concrete bunker construction - would have saved those buildings from the storm surge. And despite your saying "be prepared, because it happens all the time," the Sandy storm surge MADE HISTORY. http://seaandskyny.com/ So the bottom line is ANY community close to an ocean and not elevated sufficiently can suffer a disastrous storm surge. Or a Tsunami. Nobody will prepare for a +300 year event like you want them too. Florida codes don't protect from a strong cat 5, they just anticipate what's fairly common there. So your suggestion that Florida building codes be de rigueur elsewhere is flat wrong. They don't seem to be in Staten Island. What are they doing "all over the place", actually providing some kind of relief or just looking? Find out yourself. You don't know what you are talking about. Folks who base their judgements solely on political finger in the wind, are easy to spot here. I have dozens of friends "down there" right frekin' now. I don't have to "find out for myself" and neither does Greg, all he has to do is listen.. Bull****. http://tinyurl.com/cnttcoc |
Where is the media coverage?
On 11/3/2012 1:17 PM, harry wrote:
wrote: On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:04:10 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Bull**** The current FEMA rules are you can't build below sea level Yet they allowed them to do it there again, just setting the taxpayers up for another fall. You can talk about NOLA all you want. That was a levee failure. I'm talking about Sandy. Staten Island is above sea level, and no ****ing building code - except requiring stilting or concrete bunker construction - would have saved those buildings from the storm surge. And despite your saying "be prepared, because it happens all the time," the Sandy storm surge MADE HISTORY. http://seaandskyny.com/ So the bottom line is ANY community close to an ocean and not elevated sufficiently can suffer a disastrous storm surge. Or a Tsunami. Nobody will prepare for a +300 year event like you want them too. Florida codes don't protect from a strong cat 5, they just anticipate what's fairly common there. So your suggestion that Florida building codes be de rigueur elsewhere is flat wrong. The FEMA code is an elevation code. That water would go UNDER the house. They don't seem to be in Staten Island. What are they doing "all over the place", actually providing some kind of relief or just looking? Find out yourself. It's easy enough. Don't get all jacked up when you post non-fact and it gets challenged. BTW, FEMA is for when building codes don't work. Otherwise we wouldn't need it. I saw Harry say they were doing something for some people in lower Manhattan but the rest of the area seems to be forgotten. We could just huddle inside our bunkers until the storm passes. Yes that is exactly what you do, evacuate or hunker in the bunker. I'm not Harry. I am harry. I borrowed his handle. Truth is you have no idea how large an area isgetting help from FEMA. Our individual opinions are just that. Opinions. No they are not. I am here, in CT, talking real time to folks who are stuck there. And harry, we know who feeds you your "opinions" already anyway... |
Where is the media coverage?
In article , says...
On 11/3/2012 1:17 PM, harry wrote: wrote: On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 11:04:10 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Bull**** The current FEMA rules are you can't build below sea level Yet they allowed them to do it there again, just setting the taxpayers up for another fall. You can talk about NOLA all you want. That was a levee failure. I'm talking about Sandy. Staten Island is above sea level, and no ****ing building code - except requiring stilting or concrete bunker construction - would have saved those buildings from the storm surge. And despite your saying "be prepared, because it happens all the time," the Sandy storm surge MADE HISTORY. http://seaandskyny.com/ So the bottom line is ANY community close to an ocean and not elevated sufficiently can suffer a disastrous storm surge. Or a Tsunami. Nobody will prepare for a +300 year event like you want them too. Florida codes don't protect from a strong cat 5, they just anticipate what's fairly common there. So your suggestion that Florida building codes be de rigueur elsewhere is flat wrong. The FEMA code is an elevation code. That water would go UNDER the house. They don't seem to be in Staten Island. What are they doing "all over the place", actually providing some kind of relief or just looking? Find out yourself. It's easy enough. Don't get all jacked up when you post non-fact and it gets challenged. BTW, FEMA is for when building codes don't work. Otherwise we wouldn't need it. I saw Harry say they were doing something for some people in lower Manhattan but the rest of the area seems to be forgotten. We could just huddle inside our bunkers until the storm passes. Yes that is exactly what you do, evacuate or hunker in the bunker. I'm not Harry. I am harry. I borrowed his handle. Truth is you have no idea how large an area isgetting help from FEMA. Our individual opinions are just that. Opinions. No they are not. I am here, in CT, talking real time to folks who are stuck there. And harry, we know who feeds you your "opinions" already anyway... Yeah, sure.... I gave you plenty of URL's of news reports, what do you think of them? |
Where is the media coverage?
|
Where is the media coverage?
|
Where is the media coverage?
wrote:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Perhaps this is because Staten Island is a patch of red in a blue state. Maybe this is New York's version of voter suppression. Pure horse**** and speculation. Just like most of the "voter suppression" horse ****. Exactly! But, alas, what does voter suppression have to do with the above speculation you posed? What part of it was hard to understand? The blue people may be trying to blunt the vote of the few red people in that area. Cut back on the kool ade :) -- Sent from my iPhone 5 |
Where is the media coverage?
On 11/4/2012 9:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Perhaps this is because Staten Island is a patch of red in a blue state. Maybe this is New York's version of voter suppression. Pure horse**** and speculation. Just like most of the "voter suppression" horse ****. Exactly! But, alas, what does voter suppression have to do with the above speculation you posed? What part of it was hard to understand? The blue people may be trying to blunt the vote of the few red people in that area. That's just stupid, right wing bull****. How cum you never talk about stupid left wing bull****? |
Where is the media coverage?
On 11/4/2012 10:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 9:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Perhaps this is because Staten Island is a patch of red in a blue state. Maybe this is New York's version of voter suppression. Pure horse**** and speculation. Just like most of the "voter suppression" horse ****. Exactly! But, alas, what does voter suppression have to do with the above speculation you posed? What part of it was hard to understand? The blue people may be trying to blunt the vote of the few red people in that area. That's just stupid, right wing bull****. How cum you never talk about stupid left wing bull****? Such as? You pick. I'm happy to hear you saying anything about left wing stupidity. |
Where is the media coverage?
|
Where is the media coverage?
In article om,
says... On 11/4/2012 9:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Perhaps this is because Staten Island is a patch of red in a blue state. Maybe this is New York's version of voter suppression. Pure horse**** and speculation. Just like most of the "voter suppression" horse ****. Exactly! But, alas, what does voter suppression have to do with the above speculation you posed? What part of it was hard to understand? The blue people may be trying to blunt the vote of the few red people in that area. That's just stupid, right wing bull****. How cum you never talk about stupid left wing bull****? Such as? |
Where is the media coverage?
In article om,
says... On 11/4/2012 10:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 9:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Perhaps this is because Staten Island is a patch of red in a blue state. Maybe this is New York's version of voter suppression. Pure horse**** and speculation. Just like most of the "voter suppression" horse ****. Exactly! But, alas, what does voter suppression have to do with the above speculation you posed? What part of it was hard to understand? The blue people may be trying to blunt the vote of the few red people in that area. That's just stupid, right wing bull****. How cum you never talk about stupid left wing bull****? Such as? You pick. I'm happy to hear you saying anything about left wing stupidity. ANYONE on ANY side that acts and thinks like everything on their side is right and just and anything on the opposing side is bad and corrupt is just that, stupidity. |
Quote:
Key phrase: the media... |
Where is the media coverage?
On 11/4/2012 11:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 10:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 9:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Perhaps this is because Staten Island is a patch of red in a blue state. Maybe this is New York's version of voter suppression. Pure horse**** and speculation. Just like most of the "voter suppression" horse ****. Exactly! But, alas, what does voter suppression have to do with the above speculation you posed? What part of it was hard to understand? The blue people may be trying to blunt the vote of the few red people in that area. That's just stupid, right wing bull****. How cum you never talk about stupid left wing bull****? Such as? You pick. I'm happy to hear you saying anything about left wing stupidity. ANYONE on ANY side that acts and thinks like everything on their side is right and just and anything on the opposing side is bad and corrupt is just that, stupidity. It's odd that you only shine your light on right wing "stupid bull****". Why do you overlook "left wing stupid bull****"? |
Where is the media coverage?
On 11/5/2012 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 11:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 10:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 9:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Perhaps this is because Staten Island is a patch of red in a blue state. Maybe this is New York's version of voter suppression. Pure horse**** and speculation. Just like most of the "voter suppression" horse ****. Exactly! But, alas, what does voter suppression have to do with the above speculation you posed? What part of it was hard to understand? The blue people may be trying to blunt the vote of the few red people in that area. That's just stupid, right wing bull****. How cum you never talk about stupid left wing bull****? Such as? You pick. I'm happy to hear you saying anything about left wing stupidity. ANYONE on ANY side that acts and thinks like everything on their side is right and just and anything on the opposing side is bad and corrupt is just that, stupidity. It's odd that you only shine your light on right wing "stupid bull****". Why do you overlook "left wing stupid bull****"? Not true, to start with, I've called out Harry on a LOT of his stupid left wing bull****. The only reason you call out Harry is that you think he's a piece of **** as the rest of us do. |
Where is the media coverage?
In article om,
says... On 11/4/2012 11:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 10:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 9:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Perhaps this is because Staten Island is a patch of red in a blue state. Maybe this is New York's version of voter suppression. Pure horse**** and speculation. Just like most of the "voter suppression" horse ****. Exactly! But, alas, what does voter suppression have to do with the above speculation you posed? What part of it was hard to understand? The blue people may be trying to blunt the vote of the few red people in that area. That's just stupid, right wing bull****. How cum you never talk about stupid left wing bull****? Such as? You pick. I'm happy to hear you saying anything about left wing stupidity. ANYONE on ANY side that acts and thinks like everything on their side is right and just and anything on the opposing side is bad and corrupt is just that, stupidity. It's odd that you only shine your light on right wing "stupid bull****". Why do you overlook "left wing stupid bull****"? Not true, to start with, I've called out Harry on a LOT of his stupid left wing bull****. |
Where is the media coverage?
In article m,
says... On 11/5/2012 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 11:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 10:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 11/4/2012 9:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Perhaps this is because Staten Island is a patch of red in a blue state. Maybe this is New York's version of voter suppression. Pure horse**** and speculation. Just like most of the "voter suppression" horse ****. Exactly! But, alas, what does voter suppression have to do with the above speculation you posed? What part of it was hard to understand? The blue people may be trying to blunt the vote of the few red people in that area. That's just stupid, right wing bull****. How cum you never talk about stupid left wing bull****? Such as? You pick. I'm happy to hear you saying anything about left wing stupidity. ANYONE on ANY side that acts and thinks like everything on their side is right and just and anything on the opposing side is bad and corrupt is just that, stupidity. It's odd that you only shine your light on right wing "stupid bull****". Why do you overlook "left wing stupid bull****"? Not true, to start with, I've called out Harry on a LOT of his stupid left wing bull****. The only reason you call out Harry is that you think he's a piece of **** as the rest of us do. And his views are so far left of center that he's as crazy as you far right wingers. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com