On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:18:44 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:23:54 +0000 (UTC), thunder
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:21:27 -0700, jps wrote:


You're as dense as ever. The argument in Washington was that the
stimulus wouldn't create jobs, which was the basis of Ryan's voting
against it.

I guess these dumb ****s would have given back the $288 billion in tax
cuts the stimulus bill contained. ''

Did you say "tax cut?" Republicans only like tax cuts they shower on
rich folk. Democratic passed tax cuts for the rest of the
socio-economic strata don't mean ****.

I'll bet it's really dark up there, huh?