![]() |
Here's the truth about your boy Ryan.....
|
Here's the truth about your boy Ryan.....
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:42:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/R...al-help-as-he- championed-cuts-3941766.php If the government's going to waste money, why not waste it in his direction? Get your head out of your butt, Kevin, or Harry, whoever you are. |
Here's the truth about your boy Ryan.....
On Sunday, October 14, 2012 2:14:51 PM UTC-4, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:42:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/R...al-help-as-he- championed-cuts-3941766.php If the government's going to waste money, why not waste it in his direction? He can vote against it, but once the money is appropriated, it's his JOB to help his constituents apply for it and get it. To not do so would be wrong. |
Here's the truth about your boy Ryan.....
In article , says...
On 10/15/2012 9:03 AM, wrote: On Sunday, October 14, 2012 2:14:51 PM UTC-4, GuzzisRule wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:42:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/R...al-help-as-he- championed-cuts-3941766.php If the government's going to waste money, why not waste it in his direction? He can vote against it, but once the money is appropriated, it's his JOB to help his constituents apply for it and get it. To not do so would be wrong. Everybody knows that... the dims here are just dishonest. The democrats are dishonest because Ryan wrote FOUR letters begging for stimulus money and he is STILL against it? |
Here's the truth about your boy Ryan.....
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:21:27 -0700, jps wrote:
You're as dense as ever. The argument in Washington was that the stimulus wouldn't create jobs, which was the basis of Ryan's voting against it. I guess these dumb ****s would have given back the $288 billion in tax cuts the stimulus bill contained. But when the money was made available, Ryan was among those who argued that giving it to his constituents would create jobs. But I'm sure you're too ****ing stupid to notice the difference between No Child and this, where states are dependent on Federal funding to deliver mandated education. **** for brains, you are. |
Here's the truth about your boy Ryan.....
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:23:54 +0000 (UTC), thunder
wrote: On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:21:27 -0700, jps wrote: You're as dense as ever. The argument in Washington was that the stimulus wouldn't create jobs, which was the basis of Ryan's voting against it. I guess these dumb ****s would have given back the $288 billion in tax cuts the stimulus bill contained. '' Did you say "tax cut?" Republicans only like tax cuts they shower on rich folk. Democratic passed tax cuts for the rest of the socio-economic strata don't mean ****. |
Quote:
|
Here's the truth about your boy Ryan.....
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:18:44 -0700, jps wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:23:54 +0000 (UTC), thunder wrote: On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:21:27 -0700, jps wrote: You're as dense as ever. The argument in Washington was that the stimulus wouldn't create jobs, which was the basis of Ryan's voting against it. I guess these dumb ****s would have given back the $288 billion in tax cuts the stimulus bill contained. '' Did you say "tax cut?" Republicans only like tax cuts they shower on rich folk. Democratic passed tax cuts for the rest of the socio-economic strata don't mean ****. I'll bet it's really dark up there, huh? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com