In article ,
says...

On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:03:03 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On 9/4/2012 1:24 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:53:56 -0400, Meyer wrote:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/cape-w...--finance.html


Maybe they should talk to the Dutch who are getting out of the
offshore wind business.

"the Dutch government says offshore wind power is too expensive and
that it cannot afford to subsidize the entire cost of 18 cents per
kilowatt hour -- some 4.5 billion euros last year."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...7AF1JM20111116



What? Do you mean a country who embraced the technology now has found
that it isn't up to it? Do you think Loogie will even read this? Either
way, this puts to bed any questions he has for me as to my own opinion
on wind and solar... Neither will work until new technology is found,
AND we stop wasting money building the stuff we have now, that we
already know doesn't work...

WTF does "OFFSHORE" have to do with wind energy in general, dip****? And
do tell, moron, just what aspect of wind energy "doesn't work"?

NY states?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_New_York

California's?

http://www.energy.ca.gov/wind/overview.html

Texas?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_Texas

In other words, you either let your insanity guide you, or you are
really stupid.


The thread was about Cape Wind.

No, Scotty's position is and was that wind and solar "don't work".