|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:36:44 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 11:26 AM, wrote: On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:54:52 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. The current answer I am hearing from the victims was that this evaluation should have immediately been put in the FBI NCIC database and available to anyone who is willing to look for it, including the firearms background check. Unfortunately that would also be available to credit agencies, employers and insurance companies. (hence the privacy concern) I'm not sure, but I don't think HIPAA allows that. Therein lies the problem doesn't it. Public safety vs privacy. You end up finding yourself in exactly the same position as the NRA and I am sure you are both uncomfortable there. Should a doctor or psychologist be able to put an entry in the NCIC that would block a gun sale and how do you do that without also telling everyone else why. It does open up the question, what else would that information be used for? Would employers avoid hiring that person? Would landlords not rent to them? Would it affect their credit score? Would they have problems getting accepted to college? That would, in effect, be like having "a police record" with all the ramifications that implies. .... without ever being charged or convicted of a crime, but progressives see that as ok, as long as the folks they hold near and dear (themselves) are not held to the same standard... |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article om,
says... On 8/11/2012 11:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:57:46 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? ****ing bigoted *******.... Well, Kevin, I suppose that's as literate as I could expect from a liberal. And you are still very bigoted. And an asshole. Hey, are you really so stupid that you think I'm Kevin? Who's Kevin? Don't know, but John keeps calling me him! |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article , says...
On 8/11/2012 12:38 PM, wrote: On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:36:44 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 11:26 AM, wrote: On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:54:52 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. The current answer I am hearing from the victims was that this evaluation should have immediately been put in the FBI NCIC database and available to anyone who is willing to look for it, including the firearms background check. Unfortunately that would also be available to credit agencies, employers and insurance companies. (hence the privacy concern) I'm not sure, but I don't think HIPAA allows that. Therein lies the problem doesn't it. Public safety vs privacy. You end up finding yourself in exactly the same position as the NRA and I am sure you are both uncomfortable there. Should a doctor or psychologist be able to put an entry in the NCIC that would block a gun sale and how do you do that without also telling everyone else why. It does open up the question, what else would that information be used for? Would employers avoid hiring that person? Would landlords not rent to them? Would it affect their credit score? Would they have problems getting accepted to college? That would, in effect, be like having "a police record" with all the ramifications that implies. ... without ever being charged or convicted of a crime, but progressives see that as ok, as long as the folks they hold near and dear (themselves) are not held to the same standard... More stupid, insane bull**** from Scotty. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/12 2:04 PM, JustWait wrote:
... without ever being charged or convicted of a crime, but progressives see that as ok, as long as the folks they hold near and dear (themselves) are not held to the same standard... For a guy who is a few dollars away from being on the dole, you sure post funny stuff. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
X ` Man wrote:
On 8/10/12 10:03 PM, Earl wrote: Meyer wrote: On 8/10/2012 8:38 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote: Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the criminally insane. Ammo too! What's your solution, jps? Should this country ban all guns? Laws and bans only affect law abiding citizens. And those without a history of mental deficiency. So, you don't have a gun, right, Earliepoo? I have many. I just bought an SR1911 last week so now I have a .22LR, ..25acp, (2).357 Mag, (3) 9MM, .44 Mag, and .45acp. I didn't include my rifles or shotguns. Before you go crazy, I'm a collector. BTW - Your name-calling is sophomoric. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:51:50 -0400, Earl wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:17:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/10/12 5:05 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous drooling in a boating newsgroup solve *anything* ? Does Herring playing golf "solve anything?" Probably just frustrates the **** out of him, confirms his lack of athleticism and furthers his low self esteem. That's the perfect opportunity to blame his failures on the black man. You lefties are over the top! Earl, don't get down on yourself for this, but it requires a sense of humor to keep up. A personal attack and a racist remark don't require a sense of humor - they are both lame and hardly funny. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Aug 10, 9:50*pm, Earl wrote:
Not true. *I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/12 10:05 PM, Tim wrote:
On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Earl is a gun accident waiting to happen. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 10:05 PM, Tim wrote:
On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Yeah Tim, I guess it's like "is, is"... It all depends on what you call a target:) Right Tim??? LOL! Poor little varmint !! |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 10:07 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/11/12 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Earl is a gun accident waiting to happen. Krause is a major lunatic gun incident waiting to happen. His life partner is trained to recognize the threat he poses, but does nothing about it. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/12/12 10:33 AM, BAR wrote:
In article m, says... On 8/11/2012 10:07 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Earl is a gun accident waiting to happen. Krause is a major lunatic gun incident waiting to happen. His life partner is trained to recognize the threat he poses, but does nothing about it. Maybe she doesn't want to take out the trash? On any evaluation of mental and emotional competency, intelligence, accomplishment and compassion for my fellow humans, I would rate much higher than either of you two failed mooks. Hell, the dumbest cat in our household would score higher on those scales than either of you. I don't know where your parents went wrong, possibly in conceiving you, but as human beings and fellow inhabitants of this planet, neither of you rises higher than pond scum. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/12/2012 10:41 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/12/12 10:33 AM, BAR wrote: In article m, says... On 8/11/2012 10:07 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Earl is a gun accident waiting to happen. Krause is a major lunatic gun incident waiting to happen. His life partner is trained to recognize the threat he poses, but does nothing about it. Maybe she doesn't want to take out the trash? On any evaluation of mental and emotional competency, intelligence, accomplishment and compassion for my fellow humans, I would rate much higher than either of you two failed mooks. Hell, the dumbest cat in our household would score higher on those scales than either of you. I don't know where your parents went wrong, possibly in conceiving you, but as human beings and fellow inhabitants of this planet, neither of you rises higher than pond scum. BULL**** (aka Krause krap) |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Aug 11, 9:40*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 8/11/2012 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. *I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Yeah Tim, I guess it's like "is, is"... It all depends on what you call a target:) Right Tim??? * *LOL! *Poor little varmint !! I suppose I should have clarified: "moving targets" ?;^ ) |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/12/12 2:03 PM, Tim wrote:
On Aug 11, 9:40 pm, JustWait wrote: On 8/11/2012 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Yeah Tim, I guess it's like "is, is"... It all depends on what you call a target:) Right Tim??? LOL! Poor little varmint !! I suppose I should have clarified: "moving targets" ?;^ ) How...manly. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Aug 12, 1:06*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote: On 8/12/12 2:03 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 11, 9:40 pm, JustWait wrote: On 8/11/2012 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. *I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Yeah Tim, I guess it's like "is, is"... It all depends on what you call a target:) Right Tim??? * *LOL! *Poor little varmint !! I suppose I should have clarified: "moving targets" ?;^ ) How...manly. -- Very! |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/12/2012 2:03 PM, Tim wrote:
On Aug 11, 9:40 pm, JustWait wrote: On 8/11/2012 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Yeah Tim, I guess it's like "is, is"... It all depends on what you call a target:) Right Tim??? LOL! Poor little varmint !! I suppose I should have clarified: "moving targets" ?;^ ) More than that. Living, breathing, tiny little furry, cute, cuddly, sweet little animals who only want to live in peace and harmony with the liberals... :) So, really, if you want to keep the balance, you need to shoot one liberal for each and every widdew critter you blow to pieces!~ LOL!!! Start with harry, please? |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/12/2012 2:13 PM, Tim wrote:
On Aug 12, 1:06 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 8/12/12 2:03 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 11, 9:40 pm, JustWait wrote: On 8/11/2012 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Yeah Tim, I guess it's like "is, is"... It all depends on what you call a target:) Right Tim??? LOL! Poor little varmint !! I suppose I should have clarified: "moving targets" ?;^ ) How...manly. -- Very! Miss krause challenging someones manhood? Wonder if he was rubbing his widdew capguns when he typed that:) snerk |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/12/12 6:17 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 8/12/2012 2:03 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 11, 9:40 pm, JustWait wrote: On 8/11/2012 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Yeah Tim, I guess it's like "is, is"... It all depends on what you call a target:) Right Tim??? LOL! Poor little varmint !! I suppose I should have clarified: "moving targets" ?;^ ) More than that. Living, breathing, tiny little furry, cute, cuddly, sweet little animals who only want to live in peace and harmony with the liberals... :) So, really, if you want to keep the balance, you need to shoot one liberal for each and every widdew critter you blow to pieces!~ LOL!!! Start with harry, please? Another keeper...thanks. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/12/12 6:18 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 8/12/2012 2:13 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 12, 1:06 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 8/12/12 2:03 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 11, 9:40 pm, JustWait wrote: On 8/11/2012 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Yeah Tim, I guess it's like "is, is"... It all depends on what you call a target:) Right Tim??? LOL! Poor little varmint !! I suppose I should have clarified: "moving targets" ?;^ ) How...manly. -- Very! Miss krause challenging someones manhood? Wonder if he was rubbing his widdew capguns when he typed that:) snerk What could be funnier than you talking about manhood, Mr. Unemployable? -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Aug 11, 12:52*am, wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: Guns are designed to kill. *Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. There are about 250,000,000 guns in this country a billion rounds of ammunition fired, that didn't kill anyone last year. Amazing ain't it. Then you take your N Western states like Nebraska The Dakotas, and Montana. They have more guns per capita, and the least amount of gun laws- AND the least amount of gun crime in the nation. go figure. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/12/12 6:51 PM, Tim wrote:
On Aug 11, 12:52 am, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. There are about 250,000,000 guns in this country a billion rounds of ammunition fired, that didn't kill anyone last year. Amazing ain't it. Then you take your N Western states like Nebraska The Dakotas, and Montana. They have more guns per capita, and the least amount of gun laws- AND the least amount of gun crime in the nation. go figure. Hardly anyone lives in the Dakotas and Montana. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/12/2012 6:51 PM, Tim wrote:
On Aug 11, 12:52 am, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. There are about 250,000,000 guns in this country a billion rounds of ammunition fired, that didn't kill anyone last year. Amazing ain't it. Then you take your N Western states like Nebraska The Dakotas, and Montana. They have more guns per capita, and the least amount of gun laws- AND the least amount of gun crime in the nation. go figure. It was interesting (before I plonked the idiots here) to see jps cry about all the shootings in red states, but not a word about the ones in Seattle and other west coast "Blue" areas... It was blatant lying by omission, kind of like msnbc style "news"... |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/12/12 7:19 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 8/12/2012 6:51 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 11, 12:52 am, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. There are about 250,000,000 guns in this country a billion rounds of ammunition fired, that didn't kill anyone last year. Amazing ain't it. Then you take your N Western states like Nebraska The Dakotas, and Montana. They have more guns per capita, and the least amount of gun laws- AND the least amount of gun crime in the nation. go figure. It was interesting (before I plonked the idiots here) to see jps cry about all the shootings in red states, but not a word about the ones in Seattle and other west coast "Blue" areas... It was blatant lying by omission, kind of like msnbc style "news"... Tell us more about being psychotic, snotty. After all, you've got it down pat. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Aug 13, 7:35*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 93688445-6670-4630-8e2e-b60455c1fa86 @a17g2000yqg.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 11, 12:52 am, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.. There are about 250,000,000 guns in this country a billion rounds of ammunition fired, that didn't kill anyone last year. Amazing ain't it. Then you take your N Western states like Nebraska The Dakotas, and Montana. They have more guns per capita, and the least amount of gun laws- AND the least amount of gun crime in the nation. go figure. Not really hard to figure, those states have a very low population density, that's why crime in general is low. There is a lot of truth to that. But also there's the notion that people out there respect each others property and lives. Something you find uncommon in the larger metro areas. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/13/12 2:40 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:54:09 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/13/12 12:20 PM, wrote: The south and the west have very little in common. Other than being the home for the largest number of hate groups, you mean? The last "hate" shooter was in Wisconsin. You have plenty of haters right there in Maryland. Eastern big city police departments may be the biggest hate groups in the country The southern poverty law center, which keeps track of hate groups, maintains a map that shows the highest concentration of hate groups in the southern states. It must be a bitch for you to work so hard to find what you think are these moral equivalencies or in this case immoral equivalencies of yours. What does this have to do with the west? That was the original point. "...The south and the west..." comment. You saw that, right? It has to do with "...the south." I would guess, though, that the most violent "militia" groups are in the relatively unpopulated west. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
X ` Man wrote:
On 8/11/12 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Earl is a gun accident waiting to happen. You know nothing about me, Harry. These comments are moronic and only add to your poor reputation as a scumbag liar. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
Meyer wrote:
On 8/11/2012 10:07 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Earl is a gun accident waiting to happen. Krause is a major lunatic gun incident waiting to happen. His life partner is trained to recognize the threat he poses, but does nothing about it. Harry's gay? That explains a lot. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 8/11/2012 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Yeah Tim, I guess it's like "is, is"... It all depends on what you call a target:) Right Tim??? LOL! Poor little varmint !! You are so insane that didn't make one bit of sense. I was a classic Bill Clinton reference. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
BAR wrote:
In article m, says... On 8/11/2012 10:07 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Earl is a gun accident waiting to happen. Krause is a major lunatic gun incident waiting to happen. His life partner is trained to recognize the threat he poses, but does nothing about it. Maybe she doesn't want to take out the trash? "She"? In that case, maybe she is afraid of him. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
Meyer wrote:
On 8/12/2012 10:41 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/12/12 10:33 AM, BAR wrote: In article m, says... On 8/11/2012 10:07 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 10:05 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 10, 9:50 pm, Earl wrote: Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Me too! Earl is a gun accident waiting to happen. Krause is a major lunatic gun incident waiting to happen. His life partner is trained to recognize the threat he poses, but does nothing about it. Maybe she doesn't want to take out the trash? On any evaluation of mental and emotional competency, intelligence, accomplishment and compassion for my fellow humans, I would rate much higher than either of you two failed mooks. Hell, the dumbest cat in our household would score higher on those scales than either of you. I don't know where your parents went wrong, possibly in conceiving you, but as human beings and fellow inhabitants of this planet, neither of you rises higher than pond scum. BULL**** (aka Krause krap) He's the crazy cat guy! |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
Tim wrote:
On Aug 11, 12:52 am, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. There are about 250,000,000 guns in this country a billion rounds of ammunition fired, that didn't kill anyone last year. Amazing ain't it. Then you take your N Western states like Nebraska The Dakotas, and Montana. They have more guns per capita, and the least amount of gun laws- AND the least amount of gun crime in the nation. go figure. Fewer ****bags on welfare, too, I would guess. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
X ` Man wrote:
On 8/12/12 6:51 PM, Tim wrote: On Aug 11, 12:52 am, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. There are about 250,000,000 guns in this country a billion rounds of ammunition fired, that didn't kill anyone last year. Amazing ain't it. Then you take your N Western states like Nebraska The Dakotas, and Montana. They have more guns per capita, and the least amount of gun laws- AND the least amount of gun crime in the nation. go figure. Hardly anyone lives in the Dakotas and Montana. He qualified that with the term "per capita". Look it up. He also included Nebraska - the 38th largest by population in the "57" states. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com