|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/10/2012 10:01 PM, Earl wrote:
John H. wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote: Aug 9 (Reuters) - The Tucson gunman who killed six people and severely wounded Gabrielle Giffords has labeled himself a failure because the former Arizona Congresswoman survived his rampage, according to a prison psychologist's report released on Thursday. The report's release comes two days after Jared Loughner, 23, in a deal that will spare him the death penalty, pleaded guilty to six murders and other charges stemming from his January 2011 shooting spree at a Tucson supermarket. Psychologist Christina Pietz, who evaluated Loughner at a federal prison hospital in Missouri, said in the report that Loughner had repeatedly made comments suggesting he thought Giffords died when he shot her in the head. At one time, he suggested he understood that Giffords was alive, according to Pietz, who wrote that she pressed him on that point, and he admitted to feeling disappointed in her survival because it meant he "failed." "I'm not an assassin," Pietz's report quoted Loughner, a community college dropout, as saying. Later on in the interview, he told Pietz: "Jared Loughner failed again. He's a failure. So all of this would be for nothing." Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the criminally insane. Ammo too! What's your solution, jps? Should this country ban all guns? Illicit drugs are banned. How's that working? The same scumbags are using both! Has JPS given his solution yet? Has he explained why so many of these shootings are left wingers in blue states??? Oh, and why when some arab **** goes around shooting soldiers screaming about his God, it's not terrorism, but some white fool goes nuts and it's terrorism right out of the blocks??? I am so sick of the racism my government is pushing on us. I NEVER OWNED A SLAVE!!!!! Period... |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:17:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/10/12 5:05 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous drooling in a boating newsgroup solve *anything* ? Does Herring playing golf "solve anything?" Probably just frustrates the **** out of him, confirms his lack of athleticism and furthers his low self esteem. That's the perfect opportunity to blame his failures on the black man. You lefties are over the top! |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/10/12 10:39 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 8/10/2012 10:12 PM, Earl wrote: X ` Man wrote: On 8/10/12 12:09 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:08:46 -0400, Meyer wrote: On 8/10/2012 8:38 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote: Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the criminally insane. Ammo too! What's your solution, jps? Should this country ban all guns? Laws and bans only affect law abiding citizens. No fair, you're not jps! I really would like to see his solution. Simple. Since all the domestic terrorists who engage in mass gun murders seem to be righties, round all the gun-owning righties up, put them and their firearms into a huge fenced area in Arizona or Texas, drop in huge amounts of ammo, whiskey, crank, bibles and condoms (but no food or water) and come back in a month to see which one is still alive. Shoot him. If any of those righties held decent jobs, give those jobs to the jobless and to hard-working Mexicans. Un-****ing-believable! You are insane, Harry. The more we ignore him, the more insane he will get... Do the voices in your head sing in harmony? -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Friday, August 10, 2012 9:42:41 PM UTC-5, JustWait wrote:
On 8/10/2012 10:01 PM, Earl wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote: Aug 9 (Reuters) - The Tucson gunman who killed six people and severely wounded Gabrielle Giffords has labeled himself a failure because the former Arizona Congresswoman survived his rampage, according to a prison psychologist's report released on Thursday. The report's release comes two days after Jared Loughner, 23, in a deal that will spare him the death penalty, pleaded guilty to six murders and other charges stemming from his January 2011 shooting spree at a Tucson supermarket. Psychologist Christina Pietz, who evaluated Loughner at a federal prison hospital in Missouri, said in the report that Loughner had repeatedly made comments suggesting he thought Giffords died when he shot her in the head. At one time, he suggested he understood that Giffords was alive, according to Pietz, who wrote that she pressed him on that point, and he admitted to feeling disappointed in her survival because it meant he "failed." "I'm not an assassin," Pietz's report quoted Loughner, a community college dropout, as saying. Later on in the interview, he told Pietz: "Jared Loughner failed again. He's a failure. So all of this would be for nothing." Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the criminally insane. Ammo too! What's your solution, jps? Should this country ban all guns? Illicit drugs are banned. How's that working? The same scumbags are using both! Has JPS given his solution yet? Never. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:51:50 -0400, Earl
wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:17:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/10/12 5:05 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous drooling in a boating newsgroup solve *anything* ? Does Herring playing golf "solve anything?" Probably just frustrates the **** out of him, confirms his lack of athleticism and furthers his low self esteem. That's the perfect opportunity to blame his failures on the black man. You lefties are over the top! Earl, don't get down on yourself for this, but it requires a sense of humor to keep up. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:50:52 -0400, Earl
wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Target shooting came to pass as a means to practice, in order to be a better shot. That it became sport doesn't alter the fact that the vast majority of guns are designed to kill. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:30:03 -0700, jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:17:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/10/12 5:05 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous drooling in a boating newsgroup solve *anything* ? Does Herring playing golf "solve anything?" Probably just frustrates the **** out of him, confirms his lack of athleticism and furthers his low self esteem. That's the perfect opportunity to blame his failures on the black man. I don't bitch and whine about my golf game as you do about guns. Again, what would your solution be? You and Krause are quick to make a personal attack, but can't answer a simple question. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:21:08 -0700, jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:50:52 -0400, Earl wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Target shooting came to pass as a means to practice, in order to be a better shot. That it became sport doesn't alter the fact that the vast majority of guns are designed to kill. So what's your solution, jps? Does whining about it in a boating group help resolve the problem? |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Friday, August 10, 2012 11:19:19 AM UTC-5, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/10/12 12:09 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:08:46 -0400, Meyer wrote: On 8/10/2012 8:38 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote: Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the criminally insane. Ammo too! What's your solution, jps? Should this country ban all guns? Laws and bans only affect law abiding citizens. No fair, you're not jps! I really would like to see his solution. Simple. Since all the domestic terrorists who engage in mass gun murders seem to be righties, round all the gun-owning righties up, put them and their firearms into a huge fenced area in Arizona or Texas, drop in huge amounts of ammo, whiskey, crank, bibles and condoms (but no food or water) and come back in a month to see which one is still alive. Shoot him. If any of those righties held decent jobs, give those jobs to the jobless and to hard-working Mexicans. -- I'm a liberal Brilliant solution. Krauser. Seig Heil! |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 6:11 AM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:30:03 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:17:31 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/10/12 5:05 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous drooling in a boating newsgroup solve *anything* ? Does Herring playing golf "solve anything?" Probably just frustrates the **** out of him, confirms his lack of athleticism and furthers his low self esteem. That's the perfect opportunity to blame his failures on the black man. I don't bitch and whine about my golf game as you do about guns. Again, what would your solution be? You and Krause are quick to make a personal attack, but can't answer a simple question. Neither can think independently and can only respond as directed. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article ,
says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:50:52 -0400, Earl wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Target shooting came to pass as a means to practice, in order to be a better shot. That it became sport doesn't alter the fact that the vast majority of guns are designed to kill. Target practice is a good thing, you learn to hit what you intended to hit rather than spraying bullets all over the place. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of the workings of a human mind. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article om,
says... On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of the workings of a human mind. The DSM is just a method for ensuring that the conditions in vogue are considered to be diseases and therefore, fall under in-plan. "By design, the DSM is primarily concerned with the signs and symptoms of mental disorders, rather than the underlying causes. It claims to collect them together based on statistical or clinical patterns. As such, it has been compared to a naturalist?s field guide to birds, with similar advantages and disadvantages." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnos...nual_of_Mental _Disorders#Superficial_symptoms |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article om,
says... On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of the workings of a human mind. Or they got their degree from a third rate diploma mill in DC! |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article ,
says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 8:58 AM, BAR wrote:
In article om, says... On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of the workings of a human mind. The DSM is just a method for ensuring that the conditions in vogue are considered to be diseases and therefore, fall under in-plan. "By design, the DSM is primarily concerned with the signs and symptoms of mental disorders, rather than the underlying causes. It claims to collect them together based on statistical or clinical patterns. As such, it has been compared to a naturalist?s field guide to birds, with similar advantages and disadvantages." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnos...nual_of_Mental _Disorders#Superficial_symptoms I see. They finally wrote a book about Krause. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article ,
says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:21:08 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:50:52 -0400, Earl wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Target shooting came to pass as a means to practice, in order to be a better shot. That it became sport doesn't alter the fact that the vast majority of guns are designed to kill. So what's your solution, jps? Does whining about it in a boating group help resolve the problem? Does your constantly asking the same question in a boating newsgroup help resolve the problem? |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 9:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of the workings of a human mind. Or they got their degree from a third rate diploma mill in DC! Are you talking about the protestant lady who is supposedly married to an agnostic and got her doctorate from a Catholic college. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 9:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Which problem. There's a lot of problems that need solving. Be specific. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 9:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:21:08 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:50:52 -0400, Earl wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Target shooting came to pass as a means to practice, in order to be a better shot. That it became sport doesn't alter the fact that the vast majority of guns are designed to kill. So what's your solution, jps? Does whining about it in a boating group help resolve the problem? Does your constantly asking the same question in a boating newsgroup help resolve the problem? Pot kettle black |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article ,
says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? ****ing bigoted *******.... |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article m,
says... On 8/11/2012 9:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Which problem. There's a lot of problems that need solving. Be specific. I'm just as specific as that asshole Herring. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article m,
says... On 8/11/2012 9:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of the workings of a human mind. Or they got their degree from a third rate diploma mill in DC! Are you talking about the protestant lady who is supposedly married to an agnostic and got her doctorate from a Catholic college. If the shoe fits the swollen foot.....! |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/12 9:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? ****ing bigoted *******.... iLoogy, have you ever in your entire semi-adult life gotten through a day without attempting to insult *everyone* you encounter? It seems to be your reason for existence. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 9:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? ****ing bigoted *******.... There's your answer John. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 10:02 AM, X ` Man wrote:
iLoogy, have you ever in your entire semi-adult life gotten through a day without attempting to insult *everyone* you encounter? It seems to be your reason for existence. ROTHFLMAO Harry, you are priceless. Is he your twin brother? |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:35:00 -0400, Meyer wrote:
On 8/11/2012 10:02 AM, X ` Man wrote: iLoogy, have you ever in your entire semi-adult life gotten through a day without attempting to insult *everyone* you encounter? It seems to be your reason for existence. ROTHFLMAO Harry, you are priceless. Is he your twin brother? Unreal. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:57:46 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? ****ing bigoted *******.... Well, Kevin, I suppose that's as literate as I could expect from a liberal. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article ,
says... On 8/11/12 9:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? ****ing bigoted *******.... iLoogy, have you ever in your entire semi-adult life gotten through a day without attempting to insult *everyone* you encounter? It seems to be your reason for existence. The only people I insult are ****heads like you and Herring. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article om,
says... On 8/11/2012 9:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? ****ing bigoted *******.... There's your answer John. John doesn't realize he's a very bigoted old fart? |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article ,
says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:57:46 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? ****ing bigoted *******.... Well, Kevin, I suppose that's as literate as I could expect from a liberal. And you are still very bigoted. And an asshole. Hey, are you really so stupid that you think I'm Kevin? |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/12 11:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 8/11/12 9:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? ****ing bigoted *******.... iLoogy, have you ever in your entire semi-adult life gotten through a day without attempting to insult *everyone* you encounter? It seems to be your reason for existence. The only people I insult are ****heads like you and Herring. You insult everyone here almost every day you are here. I'll keep track for you, eh? -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/12 11:26 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:54:52 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. The current answer I am hearing from the victims was that this evaluation should have immediately been put in the FBI NCIC database and available to anyone who is willing to look for it, including the firearms background check. Unfortunately that would also be available to credit agencies, employers and insurance companies. (hence the privacy concern) I'm not sure, but I don't think HIPAA allows that. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/12 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:36:44 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 11:26 AM, wrote: On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 07:54:52 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. The current answer I am hearing from the victims was that this evaluation should have immediately been put in the FBI NCIC database and available to anyone who is willing to look for it, including the firearms background check. Unfortunately that would also be available to credit agencies, employers and insurance companies. (hence the privacy concern) I'm not sure, but I don't think HIPAA allows that. Therein lies the problem doesn't it. Public safety vs privacy. You end up finding yourself in exactly the same position as the NRA and I am sure you are both uncomfortable there. Should a doctor or psychologist be able to put an entry in the NCIC that would block a gun sale and how do you do that without also telling everyone else why. It does open up the question, what else would that information be used for? Would employers avoid hiring that person? Would landlords not rent to them? Would it affect their credit score? Would they have problems getting accepted to college? That would, in effect, be like having "a police record" with all the ramifications that implies. I would have no objection to requiring those seeking a concealable handgun to subject themselves to a serious "pass/fail" psychological exam by a licensed practitioner. This isn't foolproof, of course, but it might screen out some sociopaths. Of course, the screens would be subject to the wrath of the subjects. And of course, where would the results of the test be entered. I've never claimed keeping guns out of the hands of the crazies is easy, but we sure need to at least start a rational dialogue about how to do it. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com