OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:34:11 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:33:45 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 8/9/12 5:48 PM, Twibil wrote:
On Aug 9, 10:46 am, Sarah Ehrett wrote:


Thanks for playing. Two posts, and you've been made to look a twonk in
both. I'll leave you now. Too easy.

Pity the entire article went right over your head.

Run away....

Q: Do these lies make you feel better about yourself, little troll?

I ask because it's obvious that you're badly in need of *something*
and hope to find it on Usenet.



Bingo. "Sarah" is a guy hiding behind a woman's name to post on usenet.

You've also lied and claimed I'm living in Maryland, Krausie.

You and I have a looooong history Harry. Remember the piccys you sent to
me of yourself fishing? I no longer have the images but one I recall was
of you standing in the stern of what looks to be a deep sea fishing boat.
You claimed it was taken off the coast of Florida and you were holding up a
fish you'd caught. I guess you thought I'd be interested since I'd
mentioned on the fora that I'd caught a sailfish off Palm Beach when I was
10 years old. Guess you've conveniently forgotten that as well as the
image of me next to the aforementioned sailfish, hmmmmm?

Oh BTW, how's Anthropy? LOL.

He's a fat old man, too eh?!

Anthropy is a long haired scrawny Brit.

I was talking about Krause.

OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"
 

On 8/8/2012 10:46 AM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
To some, maybe to most but not to engineers. In the simplest terms
Krausie : Motors are powered by electricity. Engines have internal
combustion. [...

What about other types of motors, such as hydraulic? (Common on some
types of agricultural and construction equipment.)

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!

OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"
 

In article , "Tom $herman (-_-)" says...

On 8/8/2012 10:46 AM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
To some, maybe to most but not to engineers. In the simplest terms
Krausie : Motors are powered by electricity. Engines have internal
combustion. [...

What about other types of motors, such as hydraulic? (Common on some
types of agricultural and construction equipment.)

And I've never heard of the propulsive machinery of a warship referred
to as a steam motor, however it has external combustion.

OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"
 

On 8/9/2012 9:35 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:41:57 -0700 (PDT), Twibil
wrote:

You don't own a group of any kind so it isn't "your" group.

LOL. Goodness but you're an excitable little fellow. It's my "home"
group. Apparently you're unfamiliar with the term. Beginning with the
4th hit down.... http://tiny.cc/o3zsiw . You're welcome.

Keep defending Fat Krausie. :)


Funny thing is, you (S.E.) are arguing with someone who thinks he has
ownership of a group, and will relentlessly attack anyone who does not
acknowledge this. Best to ignore.

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!

OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"
 

On 8/11/2012 8:50 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
In article , "Tom $herman (-_-)" says...

On 8/8/2012 10:46 AM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
To some, maybe to most but not to engineers. In the simplest terms
Krausie : Motors are powered by electricity. Engines have internal
combustion. [...

What about other types of motors, such as hydraulic? (Common on some
types of agricultural and construction equipment.)

And I've never heard of the propulsive machinery of a warship referred
to as a steam motor, however it has external combustion.

Well, some warships have Diesel motors, er engines. :)

--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!

OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"
 

On 8/11/2012 9:50 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
In article , "Tom $herman (-_-)" says...

On 8/8/2012 10:46 AM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
To some, maybe to most but not to engineers. In the simplest terms
Krausie : Motors are powered by electricity. Engines have internal
combustion. [...

What about other types of motors, such as hydraulic? (Common on some
types of agricultural and construction equipment.)

And I've never heard of the propulsive machinery of a warship referred
to as a steam motor, however it has external combustion.


Another type of propultion which uses motors, generators/alternators,
fuel cells, batteries, engines, hydraulics, steam or any combination of
the above.
But you are not likely to find one under the bonnet of your motor-car

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5OoQadZTPk

OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"
 

On Aug 11, 7:39*pm, "Tom $herman (-_-)" ""twshermanREMOVE\"@THI
$southslope.net" wrote:
On 8/9/2012 9:35 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:41:57 -0700 (PDT), Twibil
wrote:

You don't own a group of any kind so it isn't "your" group.

LOL. * Goodness but you're an excitable little fellow. *It's my "home"
group. * * Apparently you're unfamiliar with the term. *Beginning with the
4th hit down.... *http://tiny.cc/o3zsiw* . * *You're welcome.

Keep defending Fat Krausie. * :)

Funny thing is, you (S.E.) are arguing with someone who thinks he has
ownership of a group, and will relentlessly attack anyone who does not
acknowledge this. *Best to ignore.

Heh. The self-deception continues apace.

But wait! I'm no doubt a paid government shill whose job is to
discredit patriotic American conspiracy kooks like you, so anything I
say is automatically suspect at best.

Keep up the good work, tovarich, and say hello to Tim McVeigh for us.

OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"
 

"Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:01:33 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 8/8/12 3:47 PM, The Older Gentleman wrote:
Sarah Ehrett wrote:

In the simplest terms
Krausie : Motors are powered by electricity. Engines have internal
combustion.

I l*love it* when somebody pretends to be an absolute authority and
****s up on the most basic thing.

Here we go.

Steam engines. Internal combustion?

And you even referred to steam engines later on.



It's just the stupid hair-splitting over nonsense that posters with
nothing to add engage in to have something to post.

Krausie....didn't you claim to have been an etymologist ? I thought the
IEEE article would be of particular interest to you. Unless like
everything else you write your etymologist claim is just more make believe
and lies?

I immediately went looking for a new kind of bug tht was powered by a
nengine.

--
Beav

OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"
 

"Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:33:45 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 8/9/12 5:48 PM, Twibil wrote:
On Aug 9, 10:46 am, Sarah Ehrett wrote:


Thanks for playing. Two posts, and you've been made to look a twonk in
both. I'll leave you now. Too easy.

Pity the entire article went right over your head.

Run away....

Q: Do these lies make you feel better about yourself, little troll?

I ask because it's obvious that you're badly in need of *something*
and hope to find it on Usenet.



Bingo. "Sarah" is a guy hiding behind a woman's name to post on usenet.

You've also lied and claimed I'm living in Maryland, Krausie.

You and I have a looooong history Harry. Remember the piccys you sent to
me of yourself fishing? I no longer have the images but one I recall was
of you standing in the stern of what looks to be a deep sea fishing boat.

I hope to **** it had a motor on the back.


--
Beav

OT Semantics of "2-cycle" versus "2-stroke"
 

"Sarah Ehrett" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT), Twibil
wrote:

On Aug 9, 10:46 am, Sarah Ehrett wrote:


Thanks for playing. Two posts, and you've been made to look a twonk in
both. I'll leave you now. Too easy.

Pity the entire article went right over your head.

Run away....

Q: Do these lies make you feel better about yourself, little troll?

I ask because it's obvious that you're badly in need of *something*
and hope to find it on Usenet.

Krausie brought his off topic political crap into my group.


Oooo, "my group". I ****ing love it. Is your middle name Use or Net?


--
Beav