| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#17
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
This is a good read about Zimmerman
On Monday, July 23, 2012 4:08:52 PM UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article b.com>, says... > > On 7/23/2012 11:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > > In article b.com>, > > says... > >> > >> On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>> In article b.com>, > >>> says... > >>>> > >>>> On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>> In article .com>, > >>>>> says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>>>> In article b.com>, > >>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>>>>>> In article .com>, > >>>>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> In article > , > >>>>>>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; convicted-and-this-is-why/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; law? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> All of them. A precedent is a precedent. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> How so, specifically? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been > >>>>>>>> written and passed yet? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> That's not what you said. > >>>>>> Words have meaning. > >>>>> > >>>>> I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would > >>>>> be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged > >>>>> with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? > >>>>> > >>>> Show us the precedent in question. > >>> > >>> I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... > >>> > >> Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy. > > > > You didn't look at the link I posted?????? > > > I hardly ever do. Well then, that answers why you are ignorant. Ouch! Snerk! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A good read | General | |||
| Good read on ocean ecosystems | General | |||
| Good laugh - must read | Cruising | |||
| Ron Reagan on Bush...a good read. | General | |||
| Repost - this is so good it deserves to be read more than once | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
