| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article m,
says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? Show us the precedent in question. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article om,
says... On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? Show us the precedent in question. I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? Show us the precedent in question. I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article om,
says... On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? Show us the precedent in question. I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy. You didn't look at the link I posted?????? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A good read | General | |||
| Good read on ocean ecosystems | General | |||
| Good laugh - must read | Cruising | |||
| Ron Reagan on Bush...a good read. | General | |||
| Repost - this is so good it deserves to be read more than once | ASA | |||