| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/2012 3:07 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:07:38 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:28:12 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:54:51 -0400, wrote: Maybe god knew what a thug Martin was Wow, you've convicted Martin of something no one else has. Does that extra-legal right come in a cereal box? You all seem pretty quick to convict Zimmerman without that trial you demanded I think he's a scumbag but I haven't convicted him. I just hope he does time for his stupidity. He deserves it for engaging in a foolish pursuit of someone with whom he had no business nor right. The police dispatcher told him specifically that he "didn't need to do that" when she realized he was running after Trayvon. His negligent actions ended up with the death of a 17 year old kid. You have limited knowledge of the facts in this case, yet you are highly opinionated. You've been listening to Krause radio, I'll bet. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
In article om,
says... On 7/20/2012 3:07 AM, jps wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:07:38 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:28:12 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:54:51 -0400, wrote: Maybe god knew what a thug Martin was Wow, you've convicted Martin of something no one else has. Does that extra-legal right come in a cereal box? You all seem pretty quick to convict Zimmerman without that trial you demanded I think he's a scumbag but I haven't convicted him. I just hope he does time for his stupidity. He deserves it for engaging in a foolish pursuit of someone with whom he had no business nor right. The police dispatcher told him specifically that he "didn't need to do that" when she realized he was running after Trayvon. His negligent actions ended up with the death of a 17 year old kid. You have limited knowledge of the facts in this case, yet you are highly opinionated. You've been listening to Krause radio, I'll bet. You have limited knowledge of the facts in this case, yet you are highly opinionated. You've been listening to Rush radio, I'll bet. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/2012 8:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/20/2012 3:07 AM, jps wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:07:38 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:28:12 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:54:51 -0400, wrote: Maybe god knew what a thug Martin was Wow, you've convicted Martin of something no one else has. Does that extra-legal right come in a cereal box? You all seem pretty quick to convict Zimmerman without that trial you demanded I think he's a scumbag but I haven't convicted him. I just hope he does time for his stupidity. He deserves it for engaging in a foolish pursuit of someone with whom he had no business nor right. The police dispatcher told him specifically that he "didn't need to do that" when she realized he was running after Trayvon. His negligent actions ended up with the death of a 17 year old kid. You have limited knowledge of the facts in this case, yet you are highly opinionated. You've been listening to Krause radio, I'll bet. You have limited knowledge of the facts in this case, yet you are highly opinionated. You've been listening to Rush radio, I'll bet. That's your opinion. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/12 3:07 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:07:38 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:28:12 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:54:51 -0400, wrote: Maybe god knew what a thug Martin was Wow, you've convicted Martin of something no one else has. Does that extra-legal right come in a cereal box? You all seem pretty quick to convict Zimmerman without that trial you demanded I think he's a scumbag but I haven't convicted him. I just hope he does time for his stupidity. He deserves it for engaging in a foolish pursuit of someone with whom he had no business nor right. The police dispatcher told him specifically that he "didn't need to do that" when she realized he was running after Trayvon. His negligent actions ended up with the death of a 17 year old kid. A conviction would be nice, but the only real good that might come out of this is a serious modification of Florida's Shoot First So You Don't Have to Question Law. When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. But such change isn't likely in a state populated by rednecks, crackers, bible-toters and modern Republicans. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/2012 6:50 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/20/12 3:07 AM, jps wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:07:38 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:28:12 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:54:51 -0400, wrote: Maybe god knew what a thug Martin was Wow, you've convicted Martin of something no one else has. Does that extra-legal right come in a cereal box? You all seem pretty quick to convict Zimmerman without that trial you demanded I think he's a scumbag but I haven't convicted him. I just hope he does time for his stupidity. He deserves it for engaging in a foolish pursuit of someone with whom he had no business nor right. The police dispatcher told him specifically that he "didn't need to do that" when she realized he was running after Trayvon. His negligent actions ended up with the death of a 17 year old kid. A conviction would be nice, but the only real good that might come out of this is a serious modification of Florida's Shoot First So You Don't Have to Question Law. When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. But such change isn't likely in a state populated by rednecks, crackers, bible-toters and modern Republicans. In my opinion, the only crime committed was by Martin and he paid for it. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
In article m,
says... On 7/20/2012 6:50 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/20/12 3:07 AM, jps wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:07:38 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:28:12 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:54:51 -0400, wrote: Maybe god knew what a thug Martin was Wow, you've convicted Martin of something no one else has. Does that extra-legal right come in a cereal box? You all seem pretty quick to convict Zimmerman without that trial you demanded I think he's a scumbag but I haven't convicted him. I just hope he does time for his stupidity. He deserves it for engaging in a foolish pursuit of someone with whom he had no business nor right. The police dispatcher told him specifically that he "didn't need to do that" when she realized he was running after Trayvon. His negligent actions ended up with the death of a 17 year old kid. A conviction would be nice, but the only real good that might come out of this is a serious modification of Florida's Shoot First So You Don't Have to Question Law. When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. But such change isn't likely in a state populated by rednecks, crackers, bible-toters and modern Republicans. In my opinion, the only crime committed was by Martin and he paid for it. Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
|
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/12 10:39 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/20/2012 10:21 AM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:50:01 -0400, X ` Man wrote: When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. WTF are you supposed to do, say "I got a gun, guess you better kill me"?? You are an idiot. That all assumes they can prove Zimmerman initiated it. Simply getting out of your car is not initiating a confrontation and that is all Corey is alleging he did in the indictment Ahh, so you are NOT the guy who shot up the movie theater in Colorado. You're who I thought of as the perp when I heard about the massacre. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/2012 10:41 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/20/12 10:39 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/20/2012 10:21 AM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:50:01 -0400, X ` Man wrote: When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. WTF are you supposed to do, say "I got a gun, guess you better kill me"?? You are an idiot. That all assumes they can prove Zimmerman initiated it. Simply getting out of your car is not initiating a confrontation and that is all Corey is alleging he did in the indictment Ahh, so you are NOT the guy who shot up the movie theater in Colorado. You're who I thought of as the perp when I heard about the massacre. But you didn't alert the authorities. Hmmmm.... |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Zimmerman now in Credibility Gap | General | |||
| The issue is . . . | Cruising | |||
| Credibility Issues | ASA | |||
| Bush wants DEMOCRACY in Mideast??? Or "credibility"? | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
