|
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/2012 12:45 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m, says... On 7/20/2012 11:28 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/20/2012 10:21 AM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:50:01 -0400, X ` Man wrote: When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. WTF are you supposed to do, say "I got a gun, guess you better kill me"?? You are an idiot. Another crazy rant. You didn't even notice the word "initiate" a "confrontation"?? If you come at me in the middle of the night, do not announce who you are, and confront me, hell yes I'm going to fight back! Fight back with words, I hope. Otherwise there is a possibility you might suffer the same fate as Martin. How do you know that Martin didn't first ask him who he was and what he was doing? The phone call he was on is clear. I hope this little confrontation you initiated doesn't provoke you into doing something violent and stupid. What are you ranting about NOW???? I can assume you are clueless. |
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
|
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
In article om,
says... On 7/20/2012 12:45 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/20/2012 11:28 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/20/2012 10:21 AM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:50:01 -0400, X ` Man wrote: When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. WTF are you supposed to do, say "I got a gun, guess you better kill me"?? You are an idiot. Another crazy rant. You didn't even notice the word "initiate" a "confrontation"?? If you come at me in the middle of the night, do not announce who you are, and confront me, hell yes I'm going to fight back! Fight back with words, I hope. Otherwise there is a possibility you might suffer the same fate as Martin. How do you know that Martin didn't first ask him who he was and what he was doing? The phone call he was on is clear. I hope this little confrontation you initiated doesn't provoke you into doing something violent and stupid. What are you ranting about NOW???? I can assume you are clueless. I am! I have NO idea what you are ranting about a confrontation that *I* initiated... |
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/2012 1:09 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:29:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:50:01 -0400, X ` Man wrote: When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. That all assumes they can prove Zimmerman initiated it. Simply getting out of your car is not initiating a confrontation and that is all Corey is alleging he did in the indictment Well the, why did he get out of the car? AND you're forgetting the phone conversation Martin was having. He got out of the car to WATCH the person he called the cops on so he could point him out when they got there. Is getting out of your car a crime now? Corey seems to think so. Bull****, he confronted Martin. His girlfriend heard it. Is looking at a car a crime now? That's why you seem to think Zimmerman was justified in killing Martin. Don't get ahead of yourself. Lots happened between the first inquiry and the big bang. |
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/2012 1:10 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/20/2012 12:45 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/20/2012 11:28 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/20/2012 10:21 AM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:50:01 -0400, X ` Man wrote: When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. WTF are you supposed to do, say "I got a gun, guess you better kill me"?? You are an idiot. Another crazy rant. You didn't even notice the word "initiate" a "confrontation"?? If you come at me in the middle of the night, do not announce who you are, and confront me, hell yes I'm going to fight back! Fight back with words, I hope. Otherwise there is a possibility you might suffer the same fate as Martin. How do you know that Martin didn't first ask him who he was and what he was doing? The phone call he was on is clear. I hope this little confrontation you initiated doesn't provoke you into doing something violent and stupid. What are you ranting about NOW???? I can assume you are clueless. I am! I have NO idea what you are ranting about a confrontation that *I* initiated... I know you don't. Maybe you should just get out of the sandbox. |
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
In article om,
says... On 7/20/2012 1:09 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:29:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:50:01 -0400, X ` Man wrote: When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. That all assumes they can prove Zimmerman initiated it. Simply getting out of your car is not initiating a confrontation and that is all Corey is alleging he did in the indictment Well the, why did he get out of the car? AND you're forgetting the phone conversation Martin was having. He got out of the car to WATCH the person he called the cops on so he could point him out when they got there. Is getting out of your car a crime now? Corey seems to think so. Bull****, he confronted Martin. His girlfriend heard it. Is looking at a car a crime now? That's why you seem to think Zimmerman was justified in killing Martin. Don't get ahead of yourself. Lots happened between the first inquiry and the big bang. So? Fact is Zimmerman confronted Martin. |
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/12 2:42 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:09:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:29:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:50:01 -0400, X ` Man wrote: When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. That all assumes they can prove Zimmerman initiated it. Simply getting out of your car is not initiating a confrontation and that is all Corey is alleging he did in the indictment Well the, why did he get out of the car? AND you're forgetting the phone conversation Martin was having. He got out of the car to WATCH the person he called the cops on so he could point him out when they got there. Is getting out of your car a crime now? Corey seems to think so. Bull****, he confronted Martin. His girlfriend heard it. Is looking at a car a crime now? That's why you seem to think Zimmerman was justified in killing Martin. What was the first thing the girlfriend said she heard between them? Hint, it was Martin addressing Zimmerman. Martin was shot because he was beating the **** out of Zimmerman. I am not sure what the law is where you live but aggravated battery is a forcible felony in Florida and a bystander could have legally shot Martin if they came up on him beating Zimmerman's head on the concrete. Is that what Rush told you to say? |
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/2012 1:39 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/20/2012 1:09 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:29:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:50:01 -0400, X ` Man wrote: When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. That all assumes they can prove Zimmerman initiated it. Simply getting out of your car is not initiating a confrontation and that is all Corey is alleging he did in the indictment Well the, why did he get out of the car? AND you're forgetting the phone conversation Martin was having. He got out of the car to WATCH the person he called the cops on so he could point him out when they got there. Is getting out of your car a crime now? Corey seems to think so. Bull****, he confronted Martin. His girlfriend heard it. Is looking at a car a crime now? That's why you seem to think Zimmerman was justified in killing Martin. Don't get ahead of yourself. Lots happened between the first inquiry and the big bang. So? Fact is Zimmerman confronted Martin. How so? |
Obviously, credibility is not an issue...
On 7/20/2012 2:50 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/20/12 2:42 PM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:09:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:29:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:50:01 -0400, X ` Man wrote: When you initiate a confrontation, as Zimmerman did, you shouldn't be allowed to end it with a firearm and then claim self-defense. That all assumes they can prove Zimmerman initiated it. Simply getting out of your car is not initiating a confrontation and that is all Corey is alleging he did in the indictment Well the, why did he get out of the car? AND you're forgetting the phone conversation Martin was having. He got out of the car to WATCH the person he called the cops on so he could point him out when they got there. Is getting out of your car a crime now? Corey seems to think so. Bull****, he confronted Martin. His girlfriend heard it. Is looking at a car a crime now? That's why you seem to think Zimmerman was justified in killing Martin. What was the first thing the girlfriend said she heard between them? Hint, it was Martin addressing Zimmerman. Martin was shot because he was beating the **** out of Zimmerman. I am not sure what the law is where you live but aggravated battery is a forcible felony in Florida and a bystander could have legally shot Martin if they came up on him beating Zimmerman's head on the concrete. Is that what Rush told you to say? I wonder what would have happened if Martin's plan to kill Zimmerman had worked out. Would O'Bama still have said "That's my boy"? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com