|
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 4:06 PM, wrote:
On Friday, July 6, 2012 4:02:49 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 3:59 PM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 3:24:18 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 1:15:43 PM UTC-4, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 1:10 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 12:50 PM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Of course... Just disbelief in the superstition. I wonder which "God" they think the boson particle is? Someone please read one of the articles on the subject out loud for Loogie. It won't help. He's just looking for an argument. If he really wants to know, he'd google "Leon Ledermen", the guy that coined the term "God Particle". It's his caps. I've read a lot of articles, and no one mentions a real God except those who don't have a clue what the boson particle really is. No technical article would discuss a religious God, but practically every one of those articles properly call it the God Particle. If you had actually read all those articles you would know that. So when you said it was the "god" particle, you were lying. Got it. Cya. Hehehe. South Carolina moron, in full bloom. Hehehe. Ever the lying, bigoted, racist... eh, krause? Got that Maryland KKK newsletter contract yet? Hey, if you superstitious "religious" types would keep your religion and its superstitions to yourselves and stop trying to push it onto our society, your "religion" wouldn't be an issue. I'm agnostic. I wouldn't dream of trying to push my "agnostic beliefs" on anyone. Adopt agnosticism or don't...I don't give a **** one way or the other. I love how you dirtbaggers call me a racist because I don't hate people of color. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article ,
says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 3:24:18 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 1:15:43 PM UTC-4, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 1:10 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 12:50 PM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Of course... Just disbelief in the superstition. I wonder which "God" they think the boson particle is? Someone please read one of the articles on the subject out loud for Loogie. It won't help. He's just looking for an argument. If he really wants to know, he'd google "Leon Ledermen", the guy that coined the term "God Particle". It's his caps. I've read a lot of articles, and no one mentions a real God except those who don't have a clue what the boson particle really is. No technical article would discuss a religious God, but practically every one of those articles properly call it the God Particle. If you had actually read all those articles you would know that. So when you said it was the "god" particle, you were lying. Got it. Cya. Bull**** heaped on more bull****. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 10:34 AM, JustWait wrote:
He does, he is lying. If you follow his thinking, how do you disrespect something you don't believe exists? You can't, you can disrespect those who do believe in it, and that is all harry is doing... In your mind is disrespect the same as not respecting? Do you respect all opinions? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 10:18 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:34 AM, JustWait wrote: He does, he is lying. If you follow his thinking, how do you disrespect something you don't believe exists? You can't, you can disrespect those who do believe in it, and that is all harry is doing... In your mind is disrespect the same as not respecting? Do you respect all opinions? Apples and oranges, thought you were quicker than that... |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 10:18 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:34 AM, JustWait wrote: He does, he is lying. If you follow his thinking, how do you disrespect something you don't believe exists? You can't, you can disrespect those who do believe in it, and that is all harry is doing... In your mind is disrespect the same as not respecting? Do you respect all opinions? JustWait isn't one to understand the nuance of language. He's a latter day cave boy. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/7/2012 7:34 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 10:18 PM, thumper wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:34 AM, JustWait wrote: He does, he is lying. If you follow his thinking, how do you disrespect something you don't believe exists? You can't, you can disrespect those who do believe in it, and that is all harry is doing... In your mind is disrespect the same as not respecting? Do you respect all opinions? JustWait isn't one to understand the nuance of language. He's a latter day cave boy. 19 years of formal education hasn't brought you to a clear understanding either. Your problem isn't not respecting. We could live with that. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com