|
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 8:36 AM, wrote:
On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Whatever the usage, it has nothing to do with god except, of course, in the minds of the superstitious morons who believe in the god nonsense. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 8:44 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 8:36 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Whatever the usage, it has nothing to do with god except, of course, in the minds of the superstitious morons who believe in the god nonsense. Hethen |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article ,
says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 9:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? It's so funny how you come to conclusions. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article ,
says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote:
On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article ,
says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. Well, then it IS God! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com