| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
something for Harry to keep his eye on
|
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote:
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 2:26 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. Hey, leave them alone. They have definitively proven that each and every liberals view of the beginning of time is exactly right, oh, and they are also gonna' have time travel in a year or two as an "inadvertent" side effect of the Collider...LOL! http://www.thelivingmoon.com/42starg...RN_Portal.html |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 2:26 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. Doubtful. More likely, "Oscar" believes it *is* a "god" particle. I've always thought the Greeks had epitomized the gods the best...theirs were so colorful, so powerful, so endowed with terrific personalities. I'm not sure the superstitions about a "creator" really evolved since those ancient times. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 6:59 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 2:26 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. Doubtful. More likely, "Oscar" believes it *is* a "god" particle. I've always thought the Greeks had epitomized the gods the best...theirs were so colorful, so powerful, so endowed with terrific personalities. I'm not sure the superstitions about a "creator" really evolved since those ancient times. All it takes to get you and your sock puppets worked up is to spell dog backwards. Gotta love it. Woof! |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article , says...
On 7/6/2012 2:26 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. Hey, leave them alone. They have definitively proven that each and every liberals view of the beginning of time is exactly right, oh, and they are also gonna' have time travel in a year or two as an "inadvertent" side effect of the Collider...LOL! http://www.thelivingmoon.com/42starg...RN_Portal.html It's been proven that the earth is more that 4000 years old. What do you have to say about that? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 8:00 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/6/2012 2:26 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. Hey, leave them alone. They have definitively proven that each and every liberals view of the beginning of time is exactly right, oh, and they are also gonna' have time travel in a year or two as an "inadvertent" side effect of the Collider...LOL! http://www.thelivingmoon.com/42starg...RN_Portal.html It's been proven that the earth is more that 4000 years old. What do you have to say about that? OMG Really? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article ,
says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 8:26 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Whatever it is, it sure got Krause all worked up. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 8:36 AM, wrote:
On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Whatever the usage, it has nothing to do with god except, of course, in the minds of the superstitious morons who believe in the god nonsense. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 8:44 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 8:36 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Whatever the usage, it has nothing to do with god except, of course, in the minds of the superstitious morons who believe in the god nonsense. Hethen |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article ,
says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 9:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? It's so funny how you come to conclusions. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article ,
says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote:
On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article ,
says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. Well, then it IS God! |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:33:19 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Of course it can, harold. Even people in Maryland, home of the KKK (always upper-case), know that. Oh, and South Carolina is always upper-case. You didn't know that? You're ever the asshole, eh? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 11:54 AM, wrote:
On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:33:19 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Of course it can, harold. Even people in Maryland, home of the KKK (always upper-case), know that. Oh, and South Carolina is always upper-case. You didn't know that? You're ever the asshole, eh? South Carolina hardly deserves to be a state. It's too bad it was let back into the union after the civil war. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 11:54 AM, wrote:
On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:33:19 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Of course it can, harold. Even people in Maryland, home of the KKK (always upper-case), know that. Oh, and South Carolina is always upper-case. You didn't know that? You're ever the asshole, eh? Hee Hee Here's a link I forgot to post http://atheism.about.com/od/doesgode...talization.htm |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 11:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. Well, then it IS God! That depends on how you define IS. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Disrespect for a superstition? You betcha. I also have no respect about spilling salt or stepping over a crack in the sidewalk. As soon as one of you bozos posts proof of the existence of a "creator," I'll read it. And I mean proof, not "belief" or more superstition. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Forgot to add this link. http://atheism.about.com/od/doesgode...talization.htm |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 12:01 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Disrespect for a superstition? You betcha. I also have no respect about spilling salt or stepping over a crack in the sidewalk. As soon as one of you bozos posts proof of the existence of a "creator," I'll read it. And I mean proof, not "belief" or more superstition. You respect my beliefs and I'll respect yours. Deal? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/6/12 11:54 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:33:19 AM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Of course it can, harold. Even people in Maryland, home of the KKK (always upper-case), know that. Oh, and South Carolina is always upper-case. You didn't know that? You're ever the asshole, eh? South Carolina hardly deserves to be a state. It's too bad it was let back into the union after the civil war. And the bigot strikes again. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Of course... |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 12:50 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/6/2012 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Of course... Just disbelief in the superstition. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 1:34 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/6/2012 1:08 PM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 12:59 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 12:50 PM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Of course... Just disbelief in the superstition. You just don't get it. He does, he is lying. If you follow his thinking, how do you disrespect something you don't believe exists? You can't, you can disrespect those who do believe in it, and that is all harry is doing... Well said. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 1:37 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/6/2012 12:00 PM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. Well, then it IS God! That depends on how you define IS. Wow, did I blow that.. I should have said: "What is Dishonest" Mr. Trebek And Mr. Trebek would say Huh! |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/2012 2:23 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 1:34 PM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 1:08 PM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 12:59 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 12:50 PM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Of course... Just disbelief in the superstition. You just don't get it. He does, he is lying. If you follow his thinking, how do you disrespect something you don't believe exists? You can't, you can disrespect those who do believe in it, and that is all harry is doing... I'm supposed to respect superstitious beliefs? So, should I also respect those adults who actually believe in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy? I'd find "the religious" people in this country more tolerable if they wouldn't make efforts to force their superstitions and religiously based beliefs on those who don't believe what they do. There's two sides to that coin. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On Friday, July 6, 2012 1:50:55 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/6/2012 12:00 PM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. Well, then it IS God! That depends on how you define IS. My answer is "dishonest" Alex... snerk Please tell me what is dishonest about my statement. If you capitalize a noun it is a proper noun, ie: a name. So, what God is it? Whatever God you believe in. In your case, the God of Irrationality. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article ,
says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 1:15:43 PM UTC-4, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 1:10 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 12:50 PM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Of course... Just disbelief in the superstition. I wonder which "God" they think the boson particle is? Someone please read one of the articles on the subject out loud for Loogie. It won't help. He's just looking for an argument. If he really wants to know, he'd google "Leon Ledermen", the guy that coined the term "God Particle". It's his caps. I've read a lot of articles, and no one mentions a real God except those who don't have a clue what the boson particle really is. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 3:21 PM, wrote:
On Friday, July 6, 2012 1:50:55 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 12:00 PM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. Well, then it IS God! That depends on how you define IS. My answer is "dishonest" Alex... snerk Please tell me what is dishonest about my statement. If you capitalize a noun it is a proper noun, ie: a name. So, what God is it? Whatever God you believe in. In your case, the God of Irrationality. Religion is the god of irrationality. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
In article ,
says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 1:50:55 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 12:00 PM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. Well, then it IS God! That depends on how you define IS. My answer is "dishonest" Alex... snerk Please tell me what is dishonest about my statement. If you capitalize a noun it is a proper noun, ie: a name. So, what God is it? Whatever God you believe in. In your case, the God of Irrationality. I'm irrational because I don't believe in superstition??? |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On Friday, July 6, 2012 3:24:18 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 1:15:43 PM UTC-4, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 1:10 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 12:50 PM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Of course... Just disbelief in the superstition. I wonder which "God" they think the boson particle is? Someone please read one of the articles on the subject out loud for Loogie. It won't help. He's just looking for an argument. If he really wants to know, he'd google "Leon Ledermen", the guy that coined the term "God Particle". It's his caps. I've read a lot of articles, and no one mentions a real God except those who don't have a clue what the boson particle really is. No technical article would discuss a religious God, but practically every one of those articles properly call it the God Particle. If you had actually read all those articles you would know that. So when you said it was the "god" particle, you were lying. Got it. Cya. |
something for Harry to keep his eye on
On 7/6/12 3:59 PM, wrote:
On Friday, July 6, 2012 3:24:18 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 1:15:43 PM UTC-4, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 1:10 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 12:50 PM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:57 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 11:33 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 11:27 AM, wrote: On Friday, July 6, 2012 11:02:46 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 9:44:39 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Friday, July 6, 2012 8:26:59 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , lid says... On 7/2/2012 10:48 AM, Oscar wrote: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...achenbach-text I hope you realize that was a facetious label that unfortunately stuck with popular media. The Particle, is being pushed as the answer to the creation or genesis of the big bang. The God particle is a good name for the entity. It's not the "God particle", it's the "god particle". Cite? http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...2/1?csp=34news Are you really saying that a boson is God? Did you really think that? Well, it appears so. Then that's some convoluted, disconnected logic you have. You asserted that God was spelled with a lower-case "g". I taught you, with a cite, that it is upper-case. That is all. The word god can be spelled with an upper case G or a lower case g. Don't they teach simple stuff like that in godforsaken south carolina? Here's how harry probably views the topic. It's not so important weather the word is capitalized or not, but whether or not disrespect is intended. In harry's case, I'm sure disrespect is intended. Of course... Just disbelief in the superstition. I wonder which "God" they think the boson particle is? Someone please read one of the articles on the subject out loud for Loogie. It won't help. He's just looking for an argument. If he really wants to know, he'd google "Leon Ledermen", the guy that coined the term "God Particle". It's his caps. I've read a lot of articles, and no one mentions a real God except those who don't have a clue what the boson particle really is. No technical article would discuss a religious God, but practically every one of those articles properly call it the God Particle. If you had actually read all those articles you would know that. So when you said it was the "god" particle, you were lying. Got it. Cya. Hehehe. South Carolina moron, in full bloom. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com