On 6/2/2012 1:39 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.


Forgot the link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockanum_River

"Historically used for industry, the river has in recent years had
hiking trails and linear parks developed along its banks. The banks of
the river are slowly being cleaned up after years of pollution and
dumping."

That's a bad thing in your eyes?

Um, if that's what you got from my post, you need to go back and read it
again, this time without the axe to grind... snerk

In article , says...

On 6/2/2012 1:39 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.


Forgot the link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockanum_River

"Historically used for industry, the river has in recent years had
hiking trails and linear parks developed along its banks. The banks of
the river are slowly being cleaned up after years of pollution and
dumping."

That's a bad thing in your eyes?

Um, if that's what you got from my post, you need to go back and read it
again, this time without the axe to grind... snerk

Well, I think I read it more thoroughly than you. Because YOU said:

"I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true."

When in fact, they've made a LOT of progress.

On 6/3/2012 7:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 1:39 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.


Forgot the link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockanum_River

"Historically used for industry, the river has in recent years had
hiking trails and linear parks developed along its banks. The banks of
the river are slowly being cleaned up after years of pollution and
dumping."

That's a bad thing in your eyes?

Um, if that's what you got from my post, you need to go back and read it
again, this time without the axe to grind...snerk

Well, I think I read it more thoroughly than you. Because YOU said:

"I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true."

When in fact, they've made a LOT of progress.

You stupid ****.. You are responding to me, and talking about a quote
Greg made about a differnet river.... I don't suppose I will get an
apology? LOL!!

In article , says...

On 6/3/2012 7:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 1:39 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.


Forgot the link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockanum_River

"Historically used for industry, the river has in recent years had
hiking trails and linear parks developed along its banks. The banks of
the river are slowly being cleaned up after years of pollution and
dumping."

That's a bad thing in your eyes?

Um, if that's what you got from my post, you need to go back and read it
again, this time without the axe to grind...snerk

Well, I think I read it more thoroughly than you. Because YOU said:

"I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true."

When in fact, they've made a LOT of progress.

You stupid ****.. You are responding to me, and talking about a quote
Greg made about a differnet river.... I don't suppose I will get an
apology? LOL!!

Uh, no. You need to go back and read. "LOL"