Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
It's Sunday, the day to...
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
It's Sunday, the day to...
On May 20, 8:26*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... ...revel in your heresy. One of my relatives by marriage is a Southern Baptist bible thumper who is always misquoting or misinterpreting the "old" testament in his attempts to justify his bigotry. That in itself is funny, because the "old" testament isn't even really his "big book of religion." Anyway, he was on same rant about the defense of marriage bull**** the far-right pushes and tried to quote some religious nonsense about how the creator wanted marriage to be between one man and one woman. That's always been a bit confusing because Adam and Eve only had sons. It also conflicts with Deuteronomy 22:15, where the creator tells a man with two wives how he should handle the matters that arise when you have children with two different women. And remember Judges 8:30, in which Gideon has 71 sons, many, many wives and a concumbine? Well, Gideon's behavior, what do you expect from a horn player, eh? Religion...why, it's whatever you want it to be! Well, there's always this, too! Deut. 22:13-21 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then turns against her, 14 and charges her with shameful deeds and publicly defames her, and says, ?I took this woman, but when I came near her, I did not find her a virgin,? 15 then the girl?s father and her mother shall take and bring out the evidence of the girl?s virginity to the elders of the city at the gate. 16 "And the girl?s father shall say to the elders, ?I gave my daughter to this man for a wife, but he turned against her; 17 and behold, he has charged her with shameful deeds, saying, "I did not find your daughter a virgin." But this is the evidence of my daughter?s virginity.? And they shall spread the garment before the elders of the city. 18 "So the elders of that city shall take the man and chastise him, 19 and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give it to the girl?s father, because he publicly defamed a virgin of Israel. And she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days. 20 "But if this charge is true, that the girl was not found a virgin, 21 then they shall bring out the girl to the doorway of her father?s house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death because she has committed an act of folly in Israel, by playing the harlot in her father?s house; thus you shall purge the evil from among you," (Deut. 22:13-21). OT (mosaic) law. And your point? |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
It's Sunday, the day to...
On 5/20/12 9:46 AM, Tim wrote:
On May 20, 8:26 am, wrote: In , dump-on- says... ...revel in your heresy. One of my relatives by marriage is a Southern Baptist bible thumper who is always misquoting or misinterpreting the "old" testament in his attempts to justify his bigotry. That in itself is funny, because the "old" testament isn't even really his "big book of religion." Anyway, he was on same rant about the defense of marriage bull**** the far-right pushes and tried to quote some religious nonsense about how the creator wanted marriage to be between one man and one woman. That's always been a bit confusing because Adam and Eve only had sons. It also conflicts with Deuteronomy 22:15, where the creator tells a man with two wives how he should handle the matters that arise when you have children with two different women. And remember Judges 8:30, in which Gideon has 71 sons, many, many wives and a concumbine? Well, Gideon's behavior, what do you expect from a horn player, eh? Religion...why, it's whatever you want it to be! Well, there's always this, too! Deut. 22:13-21 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then turns against her, 14 and charges her with shameful deeds and publicly defames her, and says, ?I took this woman, but when I came near her, I did not find her a virgin,? 15 then the girl?s father and her mother shall take and bring out the evidence of the girl?s virginity to the elders of the city at the gate. 16 "And the girl?s father shall say to the elders, ?I gave my daughter to this man for a wife, but he turned against her; 17 and behold, he has charged her with shameful deeds, saying, "I did not find your daughter a virgin." But this is the evidence of my daughter?s virginity.? And they shall spread the garment before the elders of the city. 18 "So the elders of that city shall take the man and chastise him, 19 and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give it to the girl?s father, because he publicly defamed a virgin of Israel. And she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days. 20 "But if this charge is true, that the girl was not found a virgin, 21 then they shall bring out the girl to the doorway of her father?s house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death because she has committed an act of folly in Israel, by playing the harlot in her father?s house; thus you shall purge the evil from among you," (Deut. 22:13-21). OT (mosaic) law. And your point? Virginity was highly overrated then...and now. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
It's Sunday, the day to...
On 5/20/2012 9:57 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/20/12 9:46 AM, Tim wrote: On May 20, 8:26 am, wrote: In , dump-on- says... ...revel in your heresy. One of my relatives by marriage is a Southern Baptist bible thumper who is always misquoting or misinterpreting the "old" testament in his attempts to justify his bigotry. That in itself is funny, because the "old" testament isn't even really his "big book of religion." Anyway, he was on same rant about the defense of marriage bull**** the far-right pushes and tried to quote some religious nonsense about how the creator wanted marriage to be between one man and one woman. That's always been a bit confusing because Adam and Eve only had sons. It also conflicts with Deuteronomy 22:15, where the creator tells a man with two wives how he should handle the matters that arise when you have children with two different women. And remember Judges 8:30, in which Gideon has 71 sons, many, many wives and a concumbine? Well, Gideon's behavior, what do you expect from a horn player, eh? Religion...why, it's whatever you want it to be! Well, there's always this, too! Deut. 22:13-21 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then turns against her, 14 and charges her with shameful deeds and publicly defames her, and says, ?I took this woman, but when I came near her, I did not find her a virgin,? 15 then the girl?s father and her mother shall take and bring out the evidence of the girl?s virginity to the elders of the city at the gate. 16 "And the girl?s father shall say to the elders, ?I gave my daughter to this man for a wife, but he turned against her; 17 and behold, he has charged her with shameful deeds, saying, "I did not find your daughter a virgin." But this is the evidence of my daughter?s virginity.? And they shall spread the garment before the elders of the city. 18 "So the elders of that city shall take the man and chastise him, 19 and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give it to the girl?s father, because he publicly defamed a virgin of Israel. And she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days. 20 "But if this charge is true, that the girl was not found a virgin, 21 then they shall bring out the girl to the doorway of her father?s house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death because she has committed an act of folly in Israel, by playing the harlot in her father?s house; thus you shall purge the evil from among you," (Deut. 22:13-21). OT (mosaic) law. And your point? Virginity was highly overrated then...and now. Spoken by a man who has never deflowered one. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
It's Sunday, the day to...
On 5/20/2012 10:08 AM, Oscar wrote:
And your point? Virginity was highly overrated then...and now. Spoken by a man who has never deflowered one. OH wait, didn't you hear his story about the fat, pimple faced, redhead that was so gross she couldn't get a boy her own age... so she did harry? It was right between the story of Yale Graduation and super fast sports cars....snerk |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
It's Sunday, the day to...
On 5/21/12 8:57 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 5/20/2012 10:08 AM, Oscar wrote: And your point? Virginity was highly overrated then...and now. Spoken by a man who has never deflowered one. OH wait, didn't you hear his story about the fat, pimple faced, redhead No one wants to hear about your sex life. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
It's Sunday, the day to...
On May 20, 8:57*am, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote: On 5/20/12 9:46 AM, Tim wrote: On May 20, 8:26 am, *wrote: In , dump-on- says... ...revel in your heresy. One of my relatives by marriage is a Southern Baptist bible thumper who is always misquoting or misinterpreting the "old" testament in his attempts to justify his bigotry. That in itself is funny, because the "old" testament isn't even really his "big book of religion." Anyway, he was on same rant about the defense of marriage bull**** the far-right pushes and tried to quote some religious nonsense about how the creator wanted marriage to be between one man and one woman. That's always been a bit confusing because Adam and Eve only had sons.. It also conflicts with Deuteronomy 22:15, where the creator tells a man with two wives how he should handle the matters that arise when you have children with two different women. And remember Judges 8:30, in which Gideon has 71 sons, many, many wives and a concumbine? Well, Gideon's behavior, what do you expect from a horn player, eh? Religion...why, it's whatever you want it to be! Well, there's always this, too! Deut. 22:13-21 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then turns against her, 14 and charges her with shameful deeds and publicly defames her, and says, ?I took this woman, but when I came near her, I did not find her a virgin,? 15 then the girl?s father and her mother shall take and bring out the evidence of the girl?s virginity to the elders of the city at the gate. 16 "And the girl?s father shall say to the elders, ?I gave my daughter to this man for a wife, but he turned against her; 17 and behold, he has charged her with shameful deeds, saying, "I did not find your daughter a virgin." But this is the evidence of my daughter?s virginity.? And they shall spread the garment before the elders of the city. 18 "So the elders of that city shall take the man and chastise him, 19 and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give it to the girl?s father, because he publicly defamed a virgin of Israel. And she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days. 20 "But if this charge is true, that the girl was not found a virgin, 21 then they shall bring out the girl to the doorway of her father?s house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death because she has committed an act of folly in Israel, by playing the harlot in her father?s house; thus you shall purge the evil from among you," (Deut. 22:13-21). OT (mosaic) law. And your point? Virginity was highly overrated then...and now. Why? |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
It's Sunday, the day to...
On 5/20/12 6:00 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 20, 8:57 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: Virginity was highly overrated then...and now. Why? It's bit of a simple-minded way to judge the "purity" or "righteousness" or whatever of a partner, among other things. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
It's Sunday, the day to...
On May 20, 5:22*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote: On 5/20/12 6:00 PM, Tim wrote: On May 20, 8:57 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com *wrote: Virginity was highly overrated then...and now. Why? It's bit of a simple-minded way to judge the "purity" or "righteousness" or whatever of a partner, among other things. Very simple indeed Harry, I thought you were above that. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
It's Sunday, the day to...
On 5/20/12 7:27 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 20, 5:22 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 5/20/12 6:00 PM, Tim wrote: On May 20, 8:57 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: Virginity was highly overrated then...and now. Why? It's bit of a simple-minded way to judge the "purity" or "righteousness" or whatever of a partner, among other things. Very simple indeed Harry, I thought you were above that. I don't see the connection between virginity and anything but virginity in most people over the age of 14. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another Try at Sunday On The Delaware (15/47) | Tall Ship Photos | |||
May Day, May Day becomes Time To Pay Day for Oregon Teens...... | General | |||
Rotten Day with my boat, still better than a day at work! | General | |||
Good news for the day before Valentine's day - OT | General | |||
So....between last Sunday and this Sunday coming.... | ASA |