On Apr 28, 6:43*am, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:43:05 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote:
On Apr 27, 8:09*pm, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:56:29 -0400, Wayne B wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:43:46 -0700 (PDT), North Star
wrote:

They'll appraise my 3 year old car and we'll take the 6 cyl RAV4 out
for a test run.

===

What you really want is a 4wd Tundra V8. * Great vehicle.

Nah, he really wants a 34' trawler, and he'll need a Silverado 2500 with a turbo diesel to haul it
comfortably!

He'll need more than that. Definately NOT enough truck. Try a Dodge
3500 Dually, with a Cummins and a variable power module.

Dodge...hee, hee!

Better truck than an underpowered Chev..

amazing how this thread turned easily into a slam fest.

On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:25:32 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote:

On Apr 28, 6:43*am, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:43:05 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c" wrote:
On Apr 27, 8:09*pm, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:56:29 -0400, Wayne B wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:43:46 -0700 (PDT), North Star
wrote:

They'll appraise my 3 year old car and we'll take the 6 cyl RAV4 out
for a test run.

===

What you really want is a 4wd Tundra V8. * Great vehicle.

Nah, he really wants a 34' trawler, and he'll need a Silverado 2500 with a turbo diesel to haul it
comfortably!

He'll need more than that. Definately NOT enough truck. Try a Dodge
3500 Dually, with a Cummins and a variable power module.

Dodge...hee, hee!

Better truck than an underpowered Chev..

Well, if the Chev is underpowered, then that's a damn true statement - if the Dodge will hold up for
a while. Chrysler Motors has not been doing well in the reliability department.