Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/2012 9:19 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:57:24 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

The rest of your post is just more of your boyish "Wayne hates Harry"
bull****.

===

Don't hate you Harry, just wish we could find you some help for that,
uhhh, problem you have.

There must be a suitable treatment plan somewhere.

How's the fishing on I-95 these days?


Be specific Wayne. Which problem?

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

In article ,
says...

In article m,
says...

On 4/20/2012 5:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.


Not really, but it wouldn't surprise me if he made that claim. Have you
figured out who it is here that he's trying to impress?

The man in the mirror, hes the only one who will speak to Harry.

snerk

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/12 9:19 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:57:24 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

The rest of your post is just more of your boyish "Wayne hates Harry"
bull****.

===

Don't hate you Harry, just wish we could find you some help for that,
uhhh, problem you have.

There must be a suitable treatment plan somewhere.

How's the fishing on I-95 these days?


Very little of interest on I-95 other than the accidents of assholes
like you who drive too fast.

The fishing in Chesapeake Bay is mediocre, as always, compared to NE
Florida. Flounder is about the only species in the Bay I find tasty
enough to eat. I don't much like the taste of striped bass. Fishing at
the mouth of the Bay, though, is damned good...lots of fish, lots of
species.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/2012 9:19 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:57:24 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

The rest of your post is just more of your boyish "Wayne hates Harry"
bull****.

===

Don't hate you Harry, just wish we could find you some help for that,
uhhh, problem you have.

There must be a suitable treatment plan somewhere.

How's the fishing on I-95 these days?



LOL!

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/12 10:42 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/21/2012 9:19 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:57:24 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

The rest of your post is just more of your boyish "Wayne hates Harry"
bull****.

===

Don't hate you Harry, just wish we could find you some help for that,
uhhh, problem you have.

There must be a suitable treatment plan somewhere.

How's the fishing on I-95 these days?



LOL!


Not to worry, little toady...there's no real cure for your slowmindedness.

BTW, has your kiddie motorbike team won any serious races this season?

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:09:06 -0400, Oscar wrote:

On 4/20/2012 8:57 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 7:28 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:36:56 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 4/19/12 9:25 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 9:24 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 8:39 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:10:05 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 4:32 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:23 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:50:37 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Can we infer that you'd prefer an economy of unionized, make
work,
government employees who make a living by taxing each other?
Without
free enterprise you'd have no incentive for innovation or
efficiency.
The former Soviet Union found that out the hard way.


No, Wayne, you cannot infer that, and I'm not advocating
Sov-style
communism. I am in favor of steps that help rebuild the middle
class in
this country, though. I see no point in a country that exists
only to
enrich the rich.

====

When you talk about rebuilding the middle class, are you really
refering to the unionized working class? Frankly I'd like to
think
that the days of $80/hour unskilled assembly line workers are
over.



I am referring to the jobs that provide goodm family supporting
wages to
working Americans, with either company or government paid health
care,
retirement, vacation and similar benefits, because the concept of
buying those benefits on your own with today's wages and livings
costs
is pretty much shot. In fact, in today's greed-driven,
corporate-dominated America, those sorts of jobs are pretty much
shot.
And without those jobs, there really is no point to this
country, is
there? A country that benefits only the rich isn't a country worth
having.

You really have it in for working class Americans, don't you,
Wayne?

No, he has it in for folks who never went to school, never got a
skill,
making the same money as a trained and schooled engineer...


Obviously, neither you nor Wayne have spent much time in
manufacturing
plants where "products" are turned out. Yes, there are some really
low-skilled jobs, but most of the workers on the assembly line or in
factories have a lot more in the way of
factory/assembly/manufacturing
skills than either you or Wayne.

I have spent time there, and know something about it. For example,
UAW
assembly line workers perform low skilled, repetitious jobs that you
could train a monkey to do. But have huge compensation packages that
very few enjoy. You really can't defend that.

Everybody wants the PS3 with a big screen, Suburban in the driveway,
all the premium channels on cable with PPV football on the weekends,
take the 3 kids to Vegas and Disney twice a year, and all on a C
average high school education. The middle class union-driven greed
took down middle class in American.


You're an ignorant class warrior as well as a racist. What a surprise.

you are a stooge...


Whatever you think I am, little toad, I have managed my life fairly
well. I managed to get a decent education, managed to get and hold
decent jobs, managed to get my kids through higher ed, managed to obtain
and hold onto health insurance, managed to run a profitable business for
several decades without engaging in intellectual property theft, managed
to set up and maintain a good retirement, managed to help my wife
through graduate school and a doctoral program, and managed to put away
some bucks for a rainy day.

If memory serves, you haven't managed so well. Do you think your
failures have anything to do with your "stoogeship" on Fox News?

And...you were the first person here to say, "Self-praise sucks."

Good job, Harry.

The operative word is "managed," doofus.

OK. You managed to heap a bunch of self praise upon yourself. Is that
better?


I don't think he gets it.