Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/2012 9:51 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 9:27 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 9:14 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 7:28 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:36:56 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 4/19/12 9:25 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 9:24 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 8:39 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:10:05 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 4:32 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:23 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:50:37 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Can we infer that you'd prefer an economy of unionized, make
work,
government employees who make a living by taxing each other?
Without
free enterprise you'd have no incentive for innovation or
efficiency.
The former Soviet Union found that out the hard way.


No, Wayne, you cannot infer that, and I'm not advocating
Sov-style
communism. I am in favor of steps that help rebuild the
middle
class in
this country, though. I see no point in a country that exists
only to
enrich the rich.

====

When you talk about rebuilding the middle class, are you
really
refering to the unionized working class? Frankly I'd like to
think
that the days of $80/hour unskilled assembly line workers are
over.



I am referring to the jobs that provide goodm family supporting
wages to
working Americans, with either company or government paid
health
care,
retirement, vacation and similar benefits, because the
concept of
buying those benefits on your own with today's wages and
livings
costs
is pretty much shot. In fact, in today's greed-driven,
corporate-dominated America, those sorts of jobs are pretty
much
shot.
And without those jobs, there really is no point to this
country, is
there? A country that benefits only the rich isn't a country
worth
having.

You really have it in for working class Americans, don't you,
Wayne?

No, he has it in for folks who never went to school, never got a
skill,
making the same money as a trained and schooled engineer...


Obviously, neither you nor Wayne have spent much time in
manufacturing
plants where "products" are turned out. Yes, there are some
really
low-skilled jobs, but most of the workers on the assembly line
or in
factories have a lot more in the way of
factory/assembly/manufacturing
skills than either you or Wayne.

I have spent time there, and know something about it. For example,
UAW
assembly line workers perform low skilled, repetitious jobs that
you
could train a monkey to do. But have huge compensation packages
that
very few enjoy. You really can't defend that.

Everybody wants the PS3 with a big screen, Suburban in the
driveway,
all the premium channels on cable with PPV football on the
weekends,
take the 3 kids to Vegas and Disney twice a year, and all on a C
average high school education. The middle class union-driven greed
took down middle class in American.


You're an ignorant class warrior as well as a racist. What a
surprise.

you are a stooge...


Whatever you think I am, little toad, I have managed my life fairly
well. I managed to get a decent education, managed to get and hold
decent jobs, managed to get my kids through higher ed, managed to
obtain
and hold onto health insurance, managed to run a profitable business
for
several decades without engaging in intellectual property theft,
managed
to set up and maintain a good retirement, managed to help my wife
through graduate school and a doctoral program, and managed to put
away
some bucks for a rainy day.

If memory serves, you haven't managed so well. Do you think your
failures have anything to do with your "stoogeship" on Fox News?

And...you were the first person here to say, "Self-praise sucks."

Good job, Harry.

Bull**** stories suck even more.. But harry is the king..

What are your accomplishments? No career, no job, a hippie daughter and
another who for whatever reasons, probably not of her making, isn't
winning the races you need to get real $ponsorShip so you can live off
that?


And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about it here
for years...

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/12 9:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 9:51 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 9:27 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 9:14 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 7:28 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:36:56 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 4/19/12 9:25 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 9:24 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 8:39 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:10:05 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 4:32 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:23 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:50:37 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Can we infer that you'd prefer an economy of unionized,
make
work,
government employees who make a living by taxing each
other?
Without
free enterprise you'd have no incentive for innovation or
efficiency.
The former Soviet Union found that out the hard way.


No, Wayne, you cannot infer that, and I'm not advocating
Sov-style
communism. I am in favor of steps that help rebuild the
middle
class in
this country, though. I see no point in a country that
exists
only to
enrich the rich.

====

When you talk about rebuilding the middle class, are you
really
refering to the unionized working class? Frankly I'd like to
think
that the days of $80/hour unskilled assembly line workers are
over.



I am referring to the jobs that provide goodm family
supporting
wages to
working Americans, with either company or government paid
health
care,
retirement, vacation and similar benefits, because the
concept of
buying those benefits on your own with today's wages and
livings
costs
is pretty much shot. In fact, in today's greed-driven,
corporate-dominated America, those sorts of jobs are pretty
much
shot.
And without those jobs, there really is no point to this
country, is
there? A country that benefits only the rich isn't a country
worth
having.

You really have it in for working class Americans, don't you,
Wayne?

No, he has it in for folks who never went to school, never
got a
skill,
making the same money as a trained and schooled engineer...


Obviously, neither you nor Wayne have spent much time in
manufacturing
plants where "products" are turned out. Yes, there are some
really
low-skilled jobs, but most of the workers on the assembly line
or in
factories have a lot more in the way of
factory/assembly/manufacturing
skills than either you or Wayne.

I have spent time there, and know something about it. For
example,
UAW
assembly line workers perform low skilled, repetitious jobs that
you
could train a monkey to do. But have huge compensation packages
that
very few enjoy. You really can't defend that.

Everybody wants the PS3 with a big screen, Suburban in the
driveway,
all the premium channels on cable with PPV football on the
weekends,
take the 3 kids to Vegas and Disney twice a year, and all on a C
average high school education. The middle class union-driven
greed
took down middle class in American.


You're an ignorant class warrior as well as a racist. What a
surprise.

you are a stooge...


Whatever you think I am, little toad, I have managed my life fairly
well. I managed to get a decent education, managed to get and hold
decent jobs, managed to get my kids through higher ed, managed to
obtain
and hold onto health insurance, managed to run a profitable business
for
several decades without engaging in intellectual property theft,
managed
to set up and maintain a good retirement, managed to help my wife
through graduate school and a doctoral program, and managed to put
away
some bucks for a rainy day.

If memory serves, you haven't managed so well. Do you think your
failures have anything to do with your "stoogeship" on Fox News?

And...you were the first person here to say, "Self-praise sucks."

Good job, Harry.

Bull**** stories suck even more.. But harry is the king..

What are your accomplishments? No career, no job, a hippie daughter and
another who for whatever reasons, probably not of her making, isn't
winning the races you need to get real $ponsorShip so you can live off
that?


And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/12 10:01 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...


Another of your fantasies, little toady.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.


It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never made any
such statement. Sorry.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:39:31 -0400, JustWait
wrote:
On 4/20/2012 9:25 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 9:14 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 7:28 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:36:56 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 4/19/12 9:25 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 9:24 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 8:39 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:10:05 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 4:32 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:23 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:50:37 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Can we infer that you'd prefer an economy of
unionized, make
work,
government employees who make a living by taxing each
other?
Without
free enterprise you'd have no incentive for
innovation or
efficiency.
The former Soviet Union found that out the hard way.


No, Wayne, you cannot infer that, and I'm not
advocating
Sov-style
communism. I am in favor of steps that help rebuild
the middle
class in
this country, though. I see no point in a country that
exists
only to
enrich the rich.

====

When you talk about rebuilding the middle class, are
you really
refering to the unionized working class? Frankly I'd
like to
think
that the days of $80/hour unskilled assembly line
workers are
over.



I am referring to the jobs that provide goodm family
supporting
wages to
working Americans, with either company or government
paid health
care,
retirement, vacation and similar benefits, because the
concept of
buying those benefits on your own with today's wages and
livings
costs
is pretty much shot. In fact, in today's greed-driven,
corporate-dominated America, those sorts of jobs are
pretty much
shot.
And without those jobs, there really is no point to this
country, is
there? A country that benefits only the rich isn't a
country
worth
having.

You really have it in for working class Americans, don't
you,
Wayne?

No, he has it in for folks who never went to school,
never got a
skill,
making the same money as a trained and schooled
engineer...


Obviously, neither you nor Wayne have spent much time in
manufacturing
plants where "products" are turned out. Yes, there are
some really
low-skilled jobs, but most of the workers on the assembly
line
or in
factories have a lot more in the way of
factory/assembly/manufacturing
skills than either you or Wayne.

I have spent time there, and know something about it. For
example,
UAW
assembly line workers perform low skilled, repetitious jobs
that you
could train a monkey to do. But have huge compensation
packages that
very few enjoy. You really can't defend that.

Everybody wants the PS3 with a big screen, Suburban in the
driveway,
all the premium channels on cable with PPV football on the
weekends,
take the 3 kids to Vegas and Disney twice a year, and all
on a C
average high school education. The middle class
union-driven greed
took down middle class in American.


You're an ignorant class warrior as well as a racist. What a
surprise.

you are a stooge...


Whatever you think I am, little toad, I have managed my life
fairly
well. I managed to get a decent education, managed to get and
hold
decent jobs, managed to get my kids through higher ed, managed
to
obtain
and hold onto health insurance, managed to run a profitable
business
for
several decades without engaging in intellectual property
theft,
managed
to set up and maintain a good retirement, managed to help my
wife
through graduate school and a doctoral program, and managed to
put away
some bucks for a rainy day.

If memory serves, you haven't managed so well. Do you think
your
failures have anything to do with your "stoogeship" on Fox
News?

And...you were the first person here to say, "Self-praise
sucks."

Good job, Harry.

Bull**** stories suck even more.. But harry is the king..


Your grapes are exceedingly sour, little toady.



Is this your new talking point? As if I would be jealous of a fat,
miserable old stooge like you.. Trust me harry, nobody here wants
to be
anything like you, or have to lie about all their phony
accomplishments
like you while hiding in your sisters basement...

Dr3X has confessed to being married to our own fingernail chewer. I
wonder if he still sucks his thumbs too?

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:52:20 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 9:47 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 9:44 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 9:40 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 9:27 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 9:14 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 7:28 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:36:56 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 4/19/12 9:25 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 9:24 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 8:39 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:10:05 PM UTC-4, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 4:32 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:23 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:50:37 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Can we infer that you'd prefer an economy of
unionized,
make
work,
government employees who make a living by taxing
each
other?
Without
free enterprise you'd have no incentive for
innovation or
efficiency.
The former Soviet Union found that out the hard
way.


No, Wayne, you cannot infer that, and I'm not
advocating
Sov-style
communism. I am in favor of steps that help rebuild
the
middle
class in
this country, though. I see no point in a country
that
exists
only to
enrich the rich.

====

When you talk about rebuilding the middle class, are
you
really
refering to the unionized working class? Frankly I'd
like to
think
that the days of $80/hour unskilled assembly line
workers are
over.



I am referring to the jobs that provide goodm family
supporting
wages to
working Americans, with either company or government
paid
health
care,
retirement, vacation and similar benefits, because the
concept of
buying those benefits on your own with today's wages
and
livings
costs
is pretty much shot. In fact, in today's greed-driven,
corporate-dominated America, those sorts of jobs are
pretty
much
shot.
And without those jobs, there really is no point to
this
country, is
there? A country that benefits only the rich isn't a
country
worth
having.

You really have it in for working class Americans,
don't you,
Wayne?

No, he has it in for folks who never went to school,
never
got a
skill,
making the same money as a trained and schooled
engineer...


Obviously, neither you nor Wayne have spent much time in
manufacturing
plants where "products" are turned out. Yes, there are
some
really
low-skilled jobs, but most of the workers on the
assembly line
or in
factories have a lot more in the way of
factory/assembly/manufacturing
skills than either you or Wayne.

I have spent time there, and know something about it. For
example,
UAW
assembly line workers perform low skilled, repetitious
jobs that
you
could train a monkey to do. But have huge compensation
packages
that
very few enjoy. You really can't defend that.

Everybody wants the PS3 with a big screen, Suburban in
the
driveway,
all the premium channels on cable with PPV football on
the
weekends,
take the 3 kids to Vegas and Disney twice a year, and
all on a C
average high school education. The middle class
union-driven
greed
took down middle class in American.


You're an ignorant class warrior as well as a racist.
What a
surprise.

you are a stooge...


Whatever you think I am, little toad, I have managed my
life fairly
well. I managed to get a decent education, managed to get
and hold
decent jobs, managed to get my kids through higher ed,
managed to
obtain
and hold onto health insurance, managed to run a profitable
business
for
several decades without engaging in intellectual property
theft,
managed
to set up and maintain a good retirement, managed to help
my wife
through graduate school and a doctoral program, and managed
to put
away
some bucks for a rainy day.

If memory serves, you haven't managed so well. Do you think
your
failures have anything to do with your "stoogeship" on Fox
News?

And...you were the first person here to say, "Self-praise
sucks."

Good job, Harry.

Bull**** stories suck even more.. But harry is the king..

What are your accomplishments? No career, no job, a hippie
daughter and
another who for whatever reasons, probably not of her making,
isn't
winning the races you need to get real $ponsorShip so you can
live off
that?


You don't know ****. What are your accomplishments, being
****ed by your
drunken father, forcing yourself on little girls and boys,
hiding in
your basement, and spending your inheritance???


Actually, no, little toady. None of your "fantasies" about me
have any
connection to reality.

Sorry stooge, everyone here has heard your fantasies for years,
fantasies about little boys and girls seem to dominate your
pedophile
lifestyle....




There is a guy here who spent a lot of time on the weekends in a
tent
with an underaged girl. Forgot his handle...do you recall it?

I recall the convicted sexual preditor named Krause who lived in
Florida and has since moved to Maryland .

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:50:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 4/20/2012 9:27 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 9:14 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 7:28 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:36:56 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 4/19/12 9:25 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 9:24 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 8:39 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:10:05 PM UTC-4, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 4:32 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:23 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:50:37 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Can we infer that you'd prefer an economy of
unionized, make
work,
government employees who make a living by taxing
each other?
Without
free enterprise you'd have no incentive for
innovation or
efficiency.
The former Soviet Union found that out the hard way.


No, Wayne, you cannot infer that, and I'm not
advocating
Sov-style
communism. I am in favor of steps that help rebuild
the middle
class in
this country, though. I see no point in a country
that exists
only to
enrich the rich.

====

When you talk about rebuilding the middle class, are
you really
refering to the unionized working class? Frankly I'd
like to
think
that the days of $80/hour unskilled assembly line
workers are
over.



I am referring to the jobs that provide goodm family
supporting
wages to
working Americans, with either company or government
paid health
care,
retirement, vacation and similar benefits, because the
concept of
buying those benefits on your own with today's wages
and livings
costs
is pretty much shot. In fact, in today's greed-driven,
corporate-dominated America, those sorts of jobs are
pretty much
shot.
And without those jobs, there really is no point to
this
country, is
there? A country that benefits only the rich isn't a
country
worth
having.

You really have it in for working class Americans,
don't you,
Wayne?

No, he has it in for folks who never went to school,
never got a
skill,
making the same money as a trained and schooled
engineer...


Obviously, neither you nor Wayne have spent much time in
manufacturing
plants where "products" are turned out. Yes, there are
some really
low-skilled jobs, but most of the workers on the
assembly line
or in
factories have a lot more in the way of
factory/assembly/manufacturing
skills than either you or Wayne.

I have spent time there, and know something about it. For
example,
UAW
assembly line workers perform low skilled, repetitious
jobs that you
could train a monkey to do. But have huge compensation
packages that
very few enjoy. You really can't defend that.

Everybody wants the PS3 with a big screen, Suburban in
the driveway,
all the premium channels on cable with PPV football on
the weekends,
take the 3 kids to Vegas and Disney twice a year, and all
on a C
average high school education. The middle class
union-driven greed
took down middle class in American.


You're an ignorant class warrior as well as a racist. What
a
surprise.

you are a stooge...


Whatever you think I am, little toad, I have managed my life
fairly
well. I managed to get a decent education, managed to get
and hold
decent jobs, managed to get my kids through higher ed,
managed to
obtain
and hold onto health insurance, managed to run a profitable
business
for
several decades without engaging in intellectual property
theft,
managed
to set up and maintain a good retirement, managed to help my
wife
through graduate school and a doctoral program, and managed
to put away
some bucks for a rainy day.

If memory serves, you haven't managed so well. Do you think
your
failures have anything to do with your "stoogeship" on Fox
News?

And...you were the first person here to say, "Self-praise
sucks."

Good job, Harry.

Bull**** stories suck even more.. But harry is the king..

What are your accomplishments? No career, no job, a hippie
daughter and
another who for whatever reasons, probably not of her making,
isn't
winning the races you need to get real $ponsorShip so you can
live off
that?


You don't know ****. What are your accomplishments, being ****ed
by your
drunken father, forcing yourself on little girls and boys, hiding
in
your basement, and spending your inheritance???


And he goes insane is 3......2......1.....

Blah, please try to make sense.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:13:21 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...


I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.

His wife dumped him and turned the kids against him. Not that it took
a lot of effort.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:44:46 -0400, JustWait
wrote:
On 4/20/2012 9:27 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 9:14 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 7:28 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 21:36:56 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 4/19/12 9:25 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 9:24 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 8:39 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:10:05 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/19/2012 4:32 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/19/12 4:23 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:50:37 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Can we infer that you'd prefer an economy of
unionized, make
work,
government employees who make a living by taxing each
other?
Without
free enterprise you'd have no incentive for
innovation or
efficiency.
The former Soviet Union found that out the hard way.


No, Wayne, you cannot infer that, and I'm not
advocating
Sov-style
communism. I am in favor of steps that help rebuild
the middle
class in
this country, though. I see no point in a country that
exists
only to
enrich the rich.

====

When you talk about rebuilding the middle class, are
you really
refering to the unionized working class? Frankly I'd
like to
think
that the days of $80/hour unskilled assembly line
workers are
over.



I am referring to the jobs that provide goodm family
supporting
wages to
working Americans, with either company or government
paid health
care,
retirement, vacation and similar benefits, because the
concept of
buying those benefits on your own with today's wages and
livings
costs
is pretty much shot. In fact, in today's greed-driven,
corporate-dominated America, those sorts of jobs are
pretty much
shot.
And without those jobs, there really is no point to this
country, is
there? A country that benefits only the rich isn't a
country
worth
having.

You really have it in for working class Americans, don't
you,
Wayne?

No, he has it in for folks who never went to school,
never got a
skill,
making the same money as a trained and schooled
engineer...


Obviously, neither you nor Wayne have spent much time in
manufacturing
plants where "products" are turned out. Yes, there are
some really
low-skilled jobs, but most of the workers on the assembly
line
or in
factories have a lot more in the way of
factory/assembly/manufacturing
skills than either you or Wayne.

I have spent time there, and know something about it. For
example,
UAW
assembly line workers perform low skilled, repetitious jobs
that you
could train a monkey to do. But have huge compensation
packages that
very few enjoy. You really can't defend that.

Everybody wants the PS3 with a big screen, Suburban in the
driveway,
all the premium channels on cable with PPV football on the
weekends,
take the 3 kids to Vegas and Disney twice a year, and all
on a C
average high school education. The middle class
union-driven greed
took down middle class in American.


You're an ignorant class warrior as well as a racist. What a
surprise.

you are a stooge...


Whatever you think I am, little toad, I have managed my life
fairly
well. I managed to get a decent education, managed to get and
hold
decent jobs, managed to get my kids through higher ed, managed
to
obtain
and hold onto health insurance, managed to run a profitable
business
for
several decades without engaging in intellectual property
theft,
managed
to set up and maintain a good retirement, managed to help my
wife
through graduate school and a doctoral program, and managed to
put away
some bucks for a rainy day.

If memory serves, you haven't managed so well. Do you think
your
failures have anything to do with your "stoogeship" on Fox
News?

And...you were the first person here to say, "Self-praise
sucks."

Good job, Harry.

Bull**** stories suck even more.. But harry is the king..

What are your accomplishments? No career, no job, a hippie
daughter and
another who for whatever reasons, probably not of her making,
isn't
winning the races you need to get real $ponsorShip so you can
live off
that?



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of
majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years
back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.

The excessive and tacky makeup was probably Krause playing with
Photoshop, trying to doll the kid up a bit.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Sorry, little toady, but I don't have a granddaughter. What I said was
something like "Here is a photo of someone's granddaughter." I never
said "Here is a photo of *my* granddaughter." Fool that you are, you
jumped to the wrong conclusion. She's actually the granddaughter of a
friend of mine. I think she was 13 or 14 at the time, and professionally
made up for a photo shoot for a catalog of clothes for young girls. As
far as I know, she got through her young teen-hood without dyeing her
hair orange or green, without tattoos, without piercings, and without a
pregnancy or venereal disease.

She's attending college these days at one of the Seven Sisters colleges.
Haven't seen her in years, but I do see her "gramps" every so often.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

In article ,
says...

On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Sorry, little toady, but I don't have a granddaughter. What I said was
something like "Here is a photo of someone's granddaughter." I never
said "Here is a photo of *my* granddaughter." Fool that you are, you
jumped to the wrong conclusion. She's actually the granddaughter of a
friend of mine. I think she was 13 or 14 at the time, and professionally
made up for a photo shoot for a catalog of clothes for young girls. As
far as I know, she got through her young teen-hood without dyeing her
hair orange or green, without tattoos, without piercings, and without a
pregnancy or venereal disease.

She's attending college these days at one of the Seven Sisters colleges.
Haven't seen her in years, but I do see her "gramps" every so often.

Gee, that's odd, you not more than a year or so ago told a lie about a
grandchild of yours that was learning a new language at a very young
age....

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/2012 12:16 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Sorry, little toady, but I don't have a granddaughter. What I said was
something like "Here is a photo of someone's granddaughter." I never
said "Here is a photo of *my* granddaughter." Fool that you are, you
jumped to the wrong conclusion. She's actually the granddaughter of a
friend of mine. I think she was 13 or 14 at the time, and professionally
made up for a photo shoot for a catalog of clothes for young girls. As
far as I know, she got through her young teen-hood without dyeing her
hair orange or green, without tattoos, without piercings, and without a
pregnancy or venereal disease.

She's attending college these days at one of the Seven Sisters colleges.
Haven't seen her in years, but I do see her "gramps" every so often.

Gee, that's odd, you not more than a year or so ago told a lie about a
grandchild of yours that was learning a new language at a very young
age....

Whooo boy... snerk that about says it all as to his above fantasies... :)

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/12 12:34 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 12:16 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of
majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years
back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Sorry, little toady, but I don't have a granddaughter. What I said was
something like "Here is a photo of someone's granddaughter." I never
said "Here is a photo of *my* granddaughter." Fool that you are, you
jumped to the wrong conclusion. She's actually the granddaughter of a
friend of mine. I think she was 13 or 14 at the time, and professionally
made up for a photo shoot for a catalog of clothes for young girls. As
far as I know, she got through her young teen-hood without dyeing her
hair orange or green, without tattoos, without piercings, and without a
pregnancy or venereal disease.

She's attending college these days at one of the Seven Sisters colleges.
Haven't seen her in years, but I do see her "gramps" every so often.

Gee, that's odd, you not more than a year or so ago told a lie about a
grandchild of yours that was learning a new language at a very young
age....

Whooo boy... snerk that about says it all as to his above fantasies... :)


D'oh. You boys are dumber than dirt.

What does a photo of a teen-aged girl who is not my granddaughter have
to do with my much younger grandson who is language-adept?

Answer: nothing.

Which is what the two of you have between your ears: nothing.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 4/20/12 12:34 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 12:16 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 4/20/12 9:44 AM, JustWait wrote:



And your kids ran from home as soon as they reached the age of
majority,
to avoid the abuse.. I did see one pic you posted a couple years
back of
your young grandchild painted like a ****ing whore.


Sorry, little toady, but I don't have a granddaughter. What I said was
something like "Here is a photo of someone's granddaughter." I never
said "Here is a photo of *my* granddaughter." Fool that you are, you
jumped to the wrong conclusion. She's actually the granddaughter of a
friend of mine. I think she was 13 or 14 at the time, and professionally
made up for a photo shoot for a catalog of clothes for young girls. As
far as I know, she got through her young teen-hood without dyeing her
hair orange or green, without tattoos, without piercings, and without a
pregnancy or venereal disease.

She's attending college these days at one of the Seven Sisters colleges.
Haven't seen her in years, but I do see her "gramps" every so often.

Gee, that's odd, you not more than a year or so ago told a lie about a
grandchild of yours that was learning a new language at a very young
age....

Whooo boy... snerk that about says it all as to his above fantasies... :)


D'oh. You boys are dumber than dirt.

What does a photo of a teen-aged girl who is not my granddaughter have
to do with my much younger grandson who is language-adept?

Answer: nothing.

Which is what the two of you have between your ears: nothing.

Nope, YOU Harry, stated right here that a grandchild of yours was
learning a second language at a very young age..... When I have time,
I'll dig it up for you!

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/12 5:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.



Never did that, **** for brains. But I do so love the "myths" that the
right-wing trash makes up.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/2012 5:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.


Not really, but it wouldn't surprise me if he made that claim. Have you
figured out who it is here that he's trying to impress?

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:46:12 -0400, Oscar wrote:

Not really, but it wouldn't surprise me if he made that claim. Have you
figured out who it is here that he's trying to impress?

===

Back in the early days of this news group Harry was always dueling
with "Skipper" from Derby, Kansas. Skipper was a crusty old
reprobate who claimed to own a nearly invincible small Bayliner cuddy.
The two of them were always duking it out and it was humorous at
times. Skipper believed that his Bayliner could do just about
anything, go virtually anywhere, and that it was just about the ideal
boat. Harry, of course, had to invent a series of (probably)
imaginary boats that would one-up Skippers mighty Bayliner. In those
days there were enough real boaters in the group that a little noise
from Harry and Skipper really wasn't all that obtrusive. All was more
or less well and good until George Bush won the first presidential
election. That pushed Harry over the edge and he really hasn't been
the same since. Skipper left the group shortly thereafter so Harry
had to find new sparring partners.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

In article m,
says...

On 4/20/2012 5:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.


Not really, but it wouldn't surprise me if he made that claim. Have you
figured out who it is here that he's trying to impress?

The man in the mirror, hes the only one who will speak to Harry.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/2012 7:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

... Skipper left the group shortly thereafter so Harry
had to find new sparring partners.

And some could occasionally make a semi-coherent argument... (Karl D.,
NOYB, etc.)

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/2012 5:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.



snerk

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/2012 5:41 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 5:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.



Never did that, **** for brains. But I do so love the "myths" that the
right-wing trash makes up.

Wow, that's the story you are gonna' go with here? LOL!

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/20/12 10:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:46:12 -0400, wrote:

Not really, but it wouldn't surprise me if he made that claim. Have you
figured out who it is here that he's trying to impress?

===

Back in the early days of this news group Harry was always dueling
with "Skipper" from Derby, Kansas. Skipper was a crusty old
reprobate who claimed to own a nearly invincible small Bayliner cuddy.
The two of them were always duking it out and it was humorous at
times. Skipper believed that his Bayliner could do just about
anything, go virtually anywhere, and that it was just about the ideal
boat. Harry, of course, had to invent a series of (probably)
imaginary boats that would one-up Skippers mighty Bayliner. In those
days there were enough real boaters in the group that a little noise
from Harry and Skipper really wasn't all that obtrusive. All was more
or less well and good until George Bush won the first presidential
election. That pushed Harry over the edge and he really hasn't been
the same since. Skipper left the group shortly thereafter so Harry
had to find new sparring partners.


Skipper could write a bit and occasionally turn a nice phrase, so his
tales of Bayliner Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.
Unfortunately, something horrific must have happened to him near the end
of his time here, and he went over the deeper end of really crazy
right-wing politics. He became a combination of Rick Santorum and
Michele Bachmann. Then his disappeared.

The rest of your post is just more of your boyish "Wayne hates Harry"
bull****.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/12 2:38 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 5:41 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 5:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.



Never did that, **** for brains. But I do so love the "myths" that the
right-wing trash makes up.

Wow, that's the story you are gonna' go with here? LOL!



How are things today in your little life of failure, toady?

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.


Well, at least Wayn'es boat gets away from t he dock and will make a
thousand mile rune away from land occasionally.


More then mine does and more than mine are capable of...

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/12 7:51 AM, Tim wrote:
Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.


Well, at least Wayn'es boat gets away from t he dock and will make a
thousand mile rune away from land occasionally.


More then mine does and more than mine are capable of...


To each his own. Wayne's boat trips remind me of drives down I-95 to
Florida. I'm not much interested in being on a boat for weeks at a time,
going to places I've been to dozens of times before.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/2012 8:00 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/21/12 7:51 AM, Tim wrote:
Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.


Well, at least Wayn'es boat gets away from t he dock and will make a
thousand mile rune away from land occasionally.


More then mine does and more than mine are capable of...


To each his own. Wayne's boat trips remind me of drives down I-95 to
Florida. I'm not much interested in being on a boat for weeks at a time,
going to places I've been to dozens of times before.

Oh brother...

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On Apr 21, 7:00*am, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 4/21/12 7:51 AM, Tim wrote:

* Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.

Well, at least Wayn'es boat gets away from t he dock and will make a
thousand mile rune away from land occasionally.

More then mine does and more than mine are capable of...

To each his own. Wayne's boat trips remind me of drives down I-95 to
Florida. I'm not much interested in being on a boat for weeks at a time,
going to places I've been to dozens of times before.

To me that would beat making circles in a pond, lake, or bay.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/2012 8:29 AM, Tim wrote:
On Apr 21, 7:00 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 4/21/12 7:51 AM, Tim wrote:

Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.

Well, at least Wayn'es boat gets away from t he dock and will make a
thousand mile rune away from land occasionally.

More then mine does and more than mine are capable of...

To each his own. Wayne's boat trips remind me of drives down I-95 to
Florida. I'm not much interested in being on a boat for weeks at a time,
going to places I've been to dozens of times before.

To me that would beat making circles in a pond, lake, or bay.

It wasn't about the trip Tim, harry wants us all to think he has been to
a quarter of the places Wayne has been. I doubt he has been to any of
them...

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/2012 2:38 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/20/2012 5:41 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 5:07 PM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:23:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 AM, wrote:
On Friday, April 20, 2012 10:01:36 AM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/2

Wrong again, little toady. Your fantasies must be about your
family
members.

We all remember you crying here your kids would have nothing
to do with
you, they left and wouldn't even talk to you.. You cried about
it here
for years...


I never ever made such a post. Perhaps you were fooled by one
of the
many Harry spoofers. You're a fool and easy to fool.

LOL! right harry... it was years before the spoofers ever
existed. We
all remember, I know it's sometimes hard for you to remember your
ongoing lies...

I clearly remember it as well. He stated he was "estranged" from
his children, and hadn't seen them in years. He's tried since then
to deny the statement, but he definitely made it.




It's fun to watch you boys give yourselves reach-arounds. Never
made any
such statement. Sorry.

You know you can,t prove it.

Do you remember when Krause had all of his posts pulled off of Google?
He forgot that all of the responses couldn't be pulled off. He lies
still exist.



Never did that, **** for brains. But I do so love the "myths" that the
right-wing trash makes up.

Wow, that's the story you are gonna' go with here? LOL!
A man who cannot see has a handicap. A man who will not see is a ****ing
moron. Confucious say.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/2012 6:57 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:46:12 -0400, wrote:

Not really, but it wouldn't surprise me if he made that claim. Have you
figured out who it is here that he's trying to impress?

===

Back in the early days of this news group Harry was always dueling
with "Skipper" from Derby, Kansas. Skipper was a crusty old
reprobate who claimed to own a nearly invincible small Bayliner cuddy.
The two of them were always duking it out and it was humorous at
times. Skipper believed that his Bayliner could do just about
anything, go virtually anywhere, and that it was just about the ideal
boat. Harry, of course, had to invent a series of (probably)
imaginary boats that would one-up Skippers mighty Bayliner. In those
days there were enough real boaters in the group that a little noise
from Harry and Skipper really wasn't all that obtrusive. All was more
or less well and good until George Bush won the first presidential
election. That pushed Harry over the edge and he really hasn't been
the same since. Skipper left the group shortly thereafter so Harry
had to find new sparring partners.


Skipper could write a bit and occasionally turn a nice phrase, so his
tales of Bayliner Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.
Unfortunately, something horrific must have happened to him near the end
of his time here, and he went over the deeper end of really crazy
right-wing politics. He became a combination of Rick Santorum and
Michele Bachmann. Then his disappeared.

The rest of your post is just more of your boyish "Wayne hates Harry"
bull****.


I like this riviting boating story. "We took the boat out today, had
lunch,went swimming, and returned to Breezy point. That was one of your
better tales of the sea. ;-/

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/2012 6:57 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/20/12 10:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:46:12 -0400, wrote:

Not really, but it wouldn't surprise me if he made that claim. Have you
figured out who it is here that he's trying to impress?

===

Back in the early days of this news group Harry was always dueling
with "Skipper" from Derby, Kansas. Skipper was a crusty old
reprobate who claimed to own a nearly invincible small Bayliner cuddy.
The two of them were always duking it out and it was humorous at
times. Skipper believed that his Bayliner could do just about
anything, go virtually anywhere, and that it was just about the ideal
boat. Harry, of course, had to invent a series of (probably)
imaginary boats that would one-up Skippers mighty Bayliner. In those
days there were enough real boaters in the group that a little noise
from Harry and Skipper really wasn't all that obtrusive. All was more
or less well and good until George Bush won the first presidential
election. That pushed Harry over the edge and he really hasn't been
the same since. Skipper left the group shortly thereafter so Harry
had to find new sparring partners.


Skipper could write a bit and occasionally turn a nice phrase, so his
tales of Bayliner Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.
Unfortunately, something horrific must have happened to him near the end
of his time here, and he went over the deeper end of really crazy
right-wing politics. He became a combination of Rick Santorum and
Michele Bachmann. Then his disappeared.

The rest of your post is just more of your boyish "Wayne hates Harry"
bull****.


Hate is a strong emotion. He may find you repulsive, repugnant, and
revolting, but I doubt he hates you. Even I don't hate you.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 4/20/12 10:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:46:12 -0400, wrote:

Not really, but it wouldn't surprise me if he made that claim. Have you
figured out who it is here that he's trying to impress?

===

Back in the early days of this news group Harry was always dueling
with "Skipper" from Derby, Kansas. Skipper was a crusty old
reprobate who claimed to own a nearly invincible small Bayliner cuddy.
The two of them were always duking it out and it was humorous at
times. Skipper believed that his Bayliner could do just about
anything, go virtually anywhere, and that it was just about the ideal
boat. Harry, of course, had to invent a series of (probably)
imaginary boats that would one-up Skippers mighty Bayliner. In those
days there were enough real boaters in the group that a little noise
from Harry and Skipper really wasn't all that obtrusive. All was more
or less well and good until George Bush won the first presidential
election. That pushed Harry over the edge and he really hasn't been
the same since. Skipper left the group shortly thereafter so Harry
had to find new sparring partners.


Skipper could write a bit and occasionally turn a nice phrase, so his
tales of Bayliner Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.
Unfortunately, something horrific must have happened to him near the end
of his time here, and he went over the deeper end of really crazy
right-wing politics. He became a combination of Rick Santorum and
Michele Bachmann. Then his disappeared.

The rest of your post is just more of your boyish "Wayne hates Harry"
bull****.

Yeah, Wayne must be in hell, going to beautiful tropical destinations in
a very nice boat when he chooses. That must be awful when he could be
spending his time watching a contractor build a deck for him and trying
to tell everyone in rec.boats that he is the one building it. Instead of
wasting his time in the Caribbean, he could be lying in rec.boats about
a Maryland red barn....

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 06:57:24 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

The rest of your post is just more of your boyish "Wayne hates Harry"
bull****.

===

Don't hate you Harry, just wish we could find you some help for that,
uhhh, problem you have.

There must be a suitable treatment plan somewhere.

How's the fishing on I-95 these days?

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/2012 8:00 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/21/12 7:51 AM, Tim wrote:
Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.


Well, at least Wayn'es boat gets away from t he dock and will make a
thousand mile rune away from land occasionally.


More then mine does and more than mine are capable of...


To each his own. Wayne's boat trips remind me of drives down I-95 to
Florida. I'm not much interested in being on a boat for weeks at a time,
going to places I've been to dozens of times before.

So why did you buy that big luxurious yacht? To impress the boys on
rec.boats? You Didn't buy it to "go to places you've been to dozens of
times before", or did you?

You are so snerkable old buddy.

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/2012 8:07 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/21/2012 8:00 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/21/12 7:51 AM, Tim wrote:
Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.


Well, at least Wayn'es boat gets away from t he dock and will make a
thousand mile rune away from land occasionally.


More then mine does and more than mine are capable of...


To each his own. Wayne's boat trips remind me of drives down I-95 to
Florida. I'm not much interested in being on a boat for weeks at a time,
going to places I've been to dozens of times before.

Oh brother...

Did tou know Harry is the jealous type?

Would stopping to help have eaten into profits?
 

On 4/21/2012 8:37 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/21/2012 8:29 AM, Tim wrote:
On Apr 21, 7:00 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 4/21/12 7:51 AM, Tim wrote:

Adventures were and are far more interesting than than
the boring and repetitive trips you take in that old barge of yours.

Well, at least Wayn'es boat gets away from t he dock and will make a
thousand mile rune away from land occasionally.

More then mine does and more than mine are capable of...

To each his own. Wayne's boat trips remind me of drives down I-95 to
Florida. I'm not much interested in being on a boat for weeks at a time,
going to places I've been to dozens of times before.

To me that would beat making circles in a pond, lake, or bay.

It wasn't about the trip Tim, harry wants us all to think he has been to
a quarter of the places Wayne has been. I doubt he has been to any of
them...

Don't read too much into the inferences Harry makes. Remember the photo
of that painted up little girl he posted?