On 4/12/2012 5:01 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 4:17 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:15:01 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 1:37 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/04/2012 11:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager
who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The
event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had
shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

Don't you mean casing the 'hood? When confronted, beat up a rent-a-cop?

Martin was walking to his father's place after buying candy and a soft
drink at a nearby convenience store. There's not the slightest evidence
he was "casing" anything. And Zimmerman wasn't a rent-a-cop.

Moron.

The Zimmerman police call said Martin was walking slow and looking
INTO cars.
We also have an indication that he stole things before. He was found
with a bag of womens jewelry and a burglary tool in school.

A. Teen-aged boys look into cars.

In what world.. Kids that look into cars, are looking for something to
take...

B. Zimmerman would have no knowledge of that.

On 4/12/12 5:51 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/12/2012 5:01 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 4:17 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:15:01 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 1:37 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/04/2012 11:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager
who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The
event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had
shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

Don't you mean casing the 'hood? When confronted, beat up a
rent-a-cop?

Martin was walking to his father's place after buying candy and a soft
drink at a nearby convenience store. There's not the slightest evidence
he was "casing" anything. And Zimmerman wasn't a rent-a-cop.

Moron.

The Zimmerman police call said Martin was walking slow and looking
INTO cars.
We also have an indication that he stole things before. He was found
with a bag of womens jewelry and a burglary tool in school.

A. Teen-aged boys look into cars.

In what world.. Kids that look into cars, are looking for something to
take...

In the real world. Of course, you would have no knowledge of the real
world, being the uninformed, ignorant psychotic you are.

On 4/12/2012 5:01 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 4:17 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:15:01 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 1:37 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/04/2012 11:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager
who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The
event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had
shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

Don't you mean casing the 'hood? When confronted, beat up a rent-a-cop?

Martin was walking to his father's place after buying candy and a soft
drink at a nearby convenience store. There's not the slightest evidence
he was "casing" anything. And Zimmerman wasn't a rent-a-cop.

Moron.

The Zimmerman police call said Martin was walking slow and looking
INTO cars.
We also have an indication that he stole things before. He was found
with a bag of womens jewelry and a burglary tool in school.

A. Teen-aged boys look into cars.

B. Zimmerman would have no knowledge of that.

Teenage boys steal things out of cars.

Zimmerman might have thought the young man who was a stranger to the
neighborhood was acting suspiciously. Zimmerman might have been
justified to scrutinize this young man's behavior.

--
http://tinyurl.com/75bq9db

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:10:23 -0400, Happy John
wrote:

On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:46:44 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 at 2:26 p.m.
Last Modified: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 at 3:09 p.m.

SANFORD - DEVELOPING: George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch volunteer
who fatally shot unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin in Florida, will
be charged in the 17-year-old's death, a law enforcement official said
Wednesday.

Special prosecutor Angela Corey will announce charges against the
28-year-old Zimmerman at a 6 p.m. Wednesday news conference, the
official with knowledge of the investigation told The Associated Press.
Corey confirmed that an announcement on the case would be made in
Jacksonville but didn't elaborate. The person said Zimmerman's arrest is
also expected soon.

The official didn't know the charge and spoke on condition of anonymity
because he wasn't authorized to release the information.

- - -

Gosh, when Zimmerman re-lawyers up, I hope he doesn't retain the firm of
JustWait & Stupid.

And there's also this:

http://tinyurl.com/87c47c8

When I looked at the link, I thought, "What a silly post!," but then
it hit me! By gawd, you're right! He gets free education, special
preference in hiring, ample retirement, preferred insurance, and free
socialized medicine for life.

Another reason to bring back capital punishment. Another line item
conquered.

All he had to do was volunteer to be cannon fodder for 30 years. Seems
like a good deal to me.

On Thursday, April 12, 2012 5:51:02 PM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/12/2012 5:01 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 4:17 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:15:01 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 1:37 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/04/2012 11:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager
who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The
event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had
shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

Don't you mean casing the 'hood? When confronted, beat up a rent-a-cop?

Martin was walking to his father's place after buying candy and a soft
drink at a nearby convenience store. There's not the slightest evidence
he was "casing" anything. And Zimmerman wasn't a rent-a-cop.

Moron.

The Zimmerman police call said Martin was walking slow and looking
INTO cars.
We also have an indication that he stole things before. He was found
with a bag of womens jewelry and a burglary tool in school.

A. Teen-aged boys look into cars.

In what world.. Kids that look into cars, are looking for something to
take...

Exactly. Kids look AT cars, and only interesting ones. If he saw a Buick or Corolla, he wouldn't even glance. If he saw a sports car or ricer, he'd look at it. Walking slowly and looking into car windows is a pretty sure sign of being up to no good, no matter how some want to spin it.

On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 5:51:02 PM UTC-4, JustWait wrote:
On 4/12/2012 5:01 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 4:17 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:15:01 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 1:37 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/04/2012 11:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager
who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The
event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had
shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

Don't you mean casing the 'hood? When confronted, beat up a rent-a-cop?

Martin was walking to his father's place after buying candy and a soft
drink at a nearby convenience store. There's not the slightest evidence
he was "casing" anything. And Zimmerman wasn't a rent-a-cop.

Moron.

The Zimmerman police call said Martin was walking slow and looking
INTO cars.
We also have an indication that he stole things before. He was found
with a bag of womens jewelry and a burglary tool in school.

A. Teen-aged boys look into cars.

In what world.. Kids that look into cars, are looking for something to
take...

Exactly. Kids look AT cars, and only interesting ones. If he saw a Buick or Corolla, he wouldn't even glance. If he saw a sports car or ricer, he'd look at it. Walking slowly and looking into car windows is a pretty sure sign of being up to no good, no matter how some want to spin it.



Wow...I'd hate to live in your paranoid world.

On 4/12/12 9:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:01:27 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 4:17 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:15:01 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 1:37 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/04/2012 11:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

Don't you mean casing the 'hood? When confronted, beat up a rent-a-cop?

Martin was walking to his father's place after buying candy and a soft
drink at a nearby convenience store. There's not the slightest evidence
he was "casing" anything. And Zimmerman wasn't a rent-a-cop.

Moron.

The Zimmerman police call said Martin was walking slow and looking
INTO cars.
We also have an indication that he stole things before. He was found
with a bag of womens jewelry and a burglary tool in school.

A. Teen-aged boys look into cars.

Especially when they are looking for I-pods,cell phones and cash


Where's your proof that the murdered boy was attempting to do that? Got
any? No? Didn't think so.

On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:02:07 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote:

On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't
square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-)

We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a
Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot
someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting
beaten before he pulled his gat.


Actually, it was a modest effort.


The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people
who tried and failed


In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest.

On Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:20:38 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:02:07 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote:

On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That doesn't
square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-)

We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a
Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot
someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting
beaten before he pulled his gat.


Actually, it was a modest effort.


The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people
who tried and failed


In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest.

Wow, I'd hate to live in your paranoid world, needing a CWP.

On 4/12/2012 9:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 9:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:02:07 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 4/12/12 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:37:34 -0400, wrote:

On 4/12/2012 1:30 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/12/12 1:06 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

Whatever else is involved, there is no
disputing the fact that he shot and killed an unarmed teen-ager
who was
doing nothing more than walking through his neighborhood. The
event was
precipitated by Zimmerman.

I ask again, would you feel the same way if it was you who had
shot an
unarmed teenager (in your house, just to follow your other note).
In Maryland, the castle doctrine is not very inclusive.
Basically you need to jump out a window if you can to retreat.


A home invader is not the same as a kid walking down the street.

He's saying you would have to jump out the window and run. That
doesn't
square with your "blow their heads off" defense strategy. ;-)

We also have to remember Harry went to quite an effort to get a
Maryland carry permit, so he must think he was going to have to shoot
someone on the street. I wonder how badly he would have to be getting
beaten before he pulled his gat.


Actually, it was a modest effort.


The process in Maryland is far from "modest". I know lots of people
who tried and failed


In my opinion, the effort I exerted to obtain said permit was modest.

Well of course it was harry. You were a secret agent, remember? LOL!!!
And of course, we believe you, we really do... snerk