On 4/10/12 9:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily
railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.



His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from
Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther
terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like
Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run...


You guess? Reads more like you are channeling that Faux News nutcase,
Sean Hannity, or, even worse, Glen Beck. Does this craziness just pop
into your head or are you on psychotropic drugs or what?

You're pathetic.

On 4/11/2012 6:50 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/10/12 9:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily
railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.



His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from
Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther
terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like
Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run...


You guess? Reads more like you are channeling that Faux News nutcase,
Sean Hannity, or, even worse, Glen Beck. Does this craziness just pop
into your head or are you on psychotropic drugs or what?

You're pathetic.

Lemme' see. You think it's ok to rape a little girl as young as ten
years old and take her across state lines to hide the crime, and you are
calling me pathetic? LOL! If you weren't such a disgusting old man, you
would almost be funny...

On 4/11/12 7:30 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 6:50 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/10/12 9:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully
working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily
railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.



His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from
Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther
terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like
Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run...


You guess? Reads more like you are channeling that Faux News nutcase,
Sean Hannity, or, even worse, Glen Beck. Does this craziness just pop
into your head or are you on psychotropic drugs or what?

You're pathetic.

Lemme' see. You think it's ok to rape a little girl as young as ten
years old and take her across state lines to hide the crime, and you are
calling me pathetic? LOL! If you weren't such a disgusting old man, you
would almost be funny...


Actually, ****-for-brains, I don't think what you are attributing to me
is "ok." I think it is just another of your fantasies about me. I do
believe, however, that even very young girls who are raped and find
themselves pregnant should be allowed to terminate that pregnancy if
*they* wish, and not have its continuation forced upon them by parents
who are either bat**** crazy or overzealously religious. Further, if
their parents refuse, they should be able to have a court-appointed
public defender get a writ that allows the abortion. I don't believe a
full-term pregnancy should be forced upon any female who doesn't want it.

That's quite a bit different from what your pea-brain fantasizes, eh?

On 4/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/11/12 7:30 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 6:50 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/10/12 9:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully
working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily
railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.



His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from
Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther
terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like
Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run...


You guess? Reads more like you are channeling that Faux News nutcase,
Sean Hannity, or, even worse, Glen Beck. Does this craziness just pop
into your head or are you on psychotropic drugs or what?

You're pathetic.

Lemme' see. You think it's ok to rape a little girl as young as ten
years old and take her across state lines to hide the crime, and you are
calling me pathetic? LOL! If you weren't such a disgusting old man, you
would almost be funny...


Actually, ****-for-brains, I don't thin

That's quite a bit different from what your pea-brain fantasizes, eh?



And quite different than what you said before... LOL!!! Sick puppy you
are...

On 4/11/12 8:25 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/11/12 7:30 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/11/2012 6:50 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/10/12 9:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully
working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily
railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.



His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message
from
Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther
terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like
Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run...


You guess? Reads more like you are channeling that Faux News nutcase,
Sean Hannity, or, even worse, Glen Beck. Does this craziness just pop
into your head or are you on psychotropic drugs or what?

You're pathetic.

Lemme' see. You think it's ok to rape a little girl as young as ten
years old and take her across state lines to hide the crime, and you are
calling me pathetic? LOL! If you weren't such a disgusting old man, you
would almost be funny...


Actually, ****-for-brains, I don't thin

That's quite a bit different from what your pea-brain fantasizes, eh?



And quite different than what you said before... LOL!!! Sick puppy you
are...


No, it isn't, ****-for-brains. You'll find no post in which *I* state
what you claim. It's just more of your bat**** craziness.

On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.



If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker.

On 4/11/2012 8:34 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily
railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.



If he's smart he'll hire Jose Bias the miracle worker.

Who do you think is gonna' want to represent him, with a US Justice Dept
sanctioned hit against Zimmerman out there? Remember, Zimmerman is
wanted dead or alive and the most racist administration in history, is
right there fanning the flames...

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this.

You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him
lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee
whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their
defense costs.

But it is standard procedure.

..

In article 9770907.306.1334087405635.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynbv32, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this.

You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him
lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee
whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their
defense costs.

This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true,
there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation.

Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee.

Especially after his lawyers quit because of his stupidness.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...yers-withdraw-
trayvon-martin-case/2012/04/10/gIQA09XG9S_story.html

In article , says...

On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.



His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from
Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther
terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like
Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run...

That's just plain stupid. Did you even understand the reasons they quit?
The idiot Zimmerman actually pursued a meeting with the special
prosecutor on his own. The lawyers hadn't heard from him in days, he
actually talked to Hannity on his own without them knowing it and on and
on. If Zimmerman goes on the run, he'll be a fugitive from justice.