On 4/5/2012 8:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 4/4/2012 1:28 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:50:30 -0400, Happy
wrote:

...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn

This is not the only place where they have been walking back the
inflammatory rhetoric they were using a week or two ago.

The news has misquoted that conversation in several areas, completely
changing the context and the actual words.

The most glaring lie is that they told him "not to follow" Martin. He
was told that they didn't "need" him to follow Martin. That sounds
more like liability lawyer speak than anything else. They don't tell
you that you "need" to call them in the first place. It doesn't mean
you can't.

But there are "glaring" facts, as well.

Zimmerman called him a racial slur.

No he didn't...
There was none of the usual investigation and forensics done in a death
by shooting.

You don't know that.
No blood splatter evidence taken,

You don't know that.
Yes I do, there was none. The Sanford Police have released what they
did, virtually nothing. Go read for yourself
no trajectory evidence
taken.

You don't know that.

Yes I do, see above.
Zimmerman was well known as a loose cannon and also well known to
the police and 911 call center, so much so that they often ignored him.

False media depiction..

No, it's not false.

The screams once attributed to Zimmerman are not his, they are Martins.

Absolutly false.

Cite?

It goes on and on.

Yes, the race baiting and lying goes on....

YOU are a racist and you know it.



Uh, yeah right...

In article , says...

On 4/5/2012 8:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 4/4/2012 1:28 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:50:30 -0400, Happy
wrote:

...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn

This is not the only place where they have been walking back the
inflammatory rhetoric they were using a week or two ago.

The news has misquoted that conversation in several areas, completely
changing the context and the actual words.

The most glaring lie is that they told him "not to follow" Martin. He
was told that they didn't "need" him to follow Martin. That sounds
more like liability lawyer speak than anything else. They don't tell
you that you "need" to call them in the first place. It doesn't mean
you can't.

But there are "glaring" facts, as well.

Zimmerman called him a racial slur.

No he didn't...
There was none of the usual investigation and forensics done in a death
by shooting.

You don't know that.
No blood splatter evidence taken,

You don't know that.
Yes I do, there was none. The Sanford Police have released what they
did, virtually nothing. Go read for yourself
no trajectory evidence
taken.

You don't know that.

Yes I do, see above.
Zimmerman was well known as a loose cannon and also well known to
the police and 911 call center, so much so that they often ignored him.

False media depiction..

No, it's not false.

The screams once attributed to Zimmerman are not his, they are Martins.

Absolutly false.

Cite?

It goes on and on.

Yes, the race baiting and lying goes on....

YOU are a racist and you know it.



Uh, yeah right...

YOU were the first one here to bring up race in the Zimmerman case. OH,
and you haven't shown me a cite where you say that the screams once
attributed to Zimmerman, and later found to be Martins, is false
information.