In article , says...

On 4/5/2012 8:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 4/4/2012 1:28 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:50:30 -0400, Happy
wrote:

...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn

This is not the only place where they have been walking back the
inflammatory rhetoric they were using a week or two ago.

The news has misquoted that conversation in several areas, completely
changing the context and the actual words.

The most glaring lie is that they told him "not to follow" Martin. He
was told that they didn't "need" him to follow Martin. That sounds
more like liability lawyer speak than anything else. They don't tell
you that you "need" to call them in the first place. It doesn't mean
you can't.

But there are "glaring" facts, as well.

Zimmerman called him a racial slur.

No he didn't...
There was none of the usual investigation and forensics done in a death
by shooting.

You don't know that.
No blood splatter evidence taken,

You don't know that.
Yes I do, there was none. The Sanford Police have released what they
did, virtually nothing. Go read for yourself
no trajectory evidence
taken.

You don't know that.

Yes I do, see above.
Zimmerman was well known as a loose cannon and also well known to
the police and 911 call center, so much so that they often ignored him.

False media depiction..

No, it's not false.

The screams once attributed to Zimmerman are not his, they are Martins.

Absolutly false.

Cite?

It goes on and on.

Yes, the race baiting and lying goes on....

YOU are a racist and you know it.



Uh, yeah right...

YOU were the first one here to bring up race in the Zimmerman case. OH,
and you haven't shown me a cite where you say that the screams once
attributed to Zimmerman, and later found to be Martins, is false
information.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:15:43 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On 4/4/2012 10:50 AM, Happy John wrote:
...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn


I guarantee the regressives here will buy their story hook, line, and
sinker just like when "God" was left out of the pledge, or the X
appeared over Cheney... It's so obvious to anybody that is concerned
with honesty in the media and want to see honest politics.

Like FOX???

Good point. Both of these "news" outlets are trash. A corporation owes
its allegiance to its stock holders. The more outrageous and tawdry
the "news," the more it sells and the more profit is generated. So
this crap isn't about "news" it is about profit.

Has anybody heard anything bad about PBS's coverage of this event?

Exactly! The trouble is, most liberal leaning people fully realize that
NBC was wrong on this and a lot of other things, while a lot of right
leaning people would never think that FOX would lie to them.

On 4/7/12 3:40 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 10:17:59 -0400, wrote:

You still haven't backed up your claim that the screams first stated as
coming from Zimmerman, now said to have come from Martin is false
information.

Actually the expert who says that is saying he is 52% sure it is
Martin and that there is a 48% chance it is Zimmerman. That is within
the margin of error., You can flip a coin and get that close.

He is also the same expert who says there was no racial slur,
Zimmerman said "punk", not "coon".



Those numbers have been updated.

On 4/7/2012 3:40 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 10:17:59 -0400, wrote:

You still haven't backed up your claim that the screams first stated as
coming from Zimmerman, now said to have come from Martin is false
information.

Actually the expert who says that is saying he is 52% sure it is
Martin and that there is a 48% chance it is Zimmerman. That is within
the margin of error., You can flip a coin and get that close.

He is also the same expert who says there was no racial slur,
Zimmerman said "punk", not "coon".



Plum is just trying to lose you in the confusion. He said I said
something, I never said. Caught lying so many times, I have to wonder if
he is just joking...

On 4/7/2012 4:26 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/7/12 3:40 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 10:17:59 -0400, wrote:

You still haven't backed up your claim that the screams first stated as
coming from Zimmerman, now said to have come from Martin is false
information.

Actually the expert who says that is saying he is 52% sure it is
Martin and that there is a 48% chance it is Zimmerman. That is within
the margin of error., You can flip a coin and get that close.

He is also the same expert who says there was no racial slur,
Zimmerman said "punk", not "coon".



Those numbers have been updated.

By who, Sharpton, or Jackson?

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 10:17:59 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

You still haven't backed up your claim that the screams first stated as
coming from Zimmerman, now said to have come from Martin is false
information.

Actually the expert who says that is saying he is 52% sure it is
Martin and that there is a 48% chance it is Zimmerman. That is within
the margin of error., You can flip a coin and get that close.

He is also the same expert who says there was no racial slur,
Zimmerman said "punk", not "coon".

You miss the point. Scotty said infatically that it is false
information. Cite?

In article , says...

On 4/7/2012 4:26 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/7/12 3:40 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 10:17:59 -0400, wrote:

You still haven't backed up your claim that the screams first stated as
coming from Zimmerman, now said to have come from Martin is false
information.

Actually the expert who says that is saying he is 52% sure it is
Martin and that there is a 48% chance it is Zimmerman. That is within
the margin of error., You can flip a coin and get that close.

He is also the same expert who says there was no racial slur,
Zimmerman said "punk", not "coon".



Those numbers have been updated.

By who, Sharpton, or Jackson?

What does it matter, your assertion that it was
"absolutely false" is just a pure bull**** lie you made up.

In article , says...

On 4/7/2012 3:40 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 10:17:59 -0400, wrote:

You still haven't backed up your claim that the screams first stated as
coming from Zimmerman, now said to have come from Martin is false
information.

Actually the expert who says that is saying he is 52% sure it is
Martin and that there is a 48% chance it is Zimmerman. That is within
the margin of error., You can flip a coin and get that close.

He is also the same expert who says there was no racial slur,
Zimmerman said "punk", not "coon".



Plum is just trying to lose you in the confusion. He said I said
something, I never said. Caught lying so many times, I have to wonder if
he is just joking...

I'm not joking at all. You are off track. This is about your assertion
that the experts say that it is Martin screaming for help and not
Zimmerman is "absolutely false". Cite pleas.