....what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn

On 4/4/2012 10:50 AM, Happy John wrote:
...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn


I guarantee the regressives here will buy their story hook, line, and
sinker just like when "God" was left out of the pledge, or the X
appeared over Cheney... It's so obvious to anybody that is concerned
with honesty in the media and want to see honest politics.

In article , says...

On 4/4/2012 10:50 AM, Happy John wrote:
...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn


I guarantee the regressives here will buy their story hook, line, and
sinker just like when "God" was left out of the pledge, or the X
appeared over Cheney... It's so obvious to anybody that is concerned
with honesty in the media and want to see honest politics.

Like FOX???

On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 10:50:30 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn


And this is serious "news"? What a joke, but many still believe they are telling us the unbiased truth.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:50:30 -0400, Happy John
wrote:

...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn

This is not the only place where they have been walking back the
inflammatory rhetoric they were using a week or two ago.

The news has misquoted that conversation in several areas, completely
changing the context and the actual words.

The most glaring lie is that they told him "not to follow" Martin. He
was told that they didn't "need" him to follow Martin. That sounds
more like liability lawyer speak than anything else. They don't tell
you that you "need" to call them in the first place. It doesn't mean
you can't.

But there are "glaring" facts, as well.

Zimmerman called him a racial slur.
There was none of the usual investigation and forensics done in a death
by shooting. No blood splatter evidence taken, no trajectory evidence
taken. Zimmerman was well known as a loose cannon and also well known to
the police and 911 call center, so much so that they often ignored him.
The screams once attributed to Zimmerman are not his, they are Martins.
It goes on and on.

On 4/4/2012 11:17 AM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 10:50:30 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn


And this is serious "news"? What a joke, but many still believe they are telling us the unbiased truth.

The only thing worse than a racist, is a race baiter. This is about as
low as you can go. If I were Zimmermans Lawyer, I would have to protest
the jury pool has been tainted already, through the intentional actions
of Jackson, Sharpton, MSNBC, CNN, The New York Lies, and on, and on...
This incident should bring MSNBC down for good...

On 4/4/2012 1:28 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:50:30 -0400, Happy
wrote:

...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn

This is not the only place where they have been walking back the
inflammatory rhetoric they were using a week or two ago.

The news has misquoted that conversation in several areas, completely
changing the context and the actual words.

The most glaring lie is that they told him "not to follow" Martin. He
was told that they didn't "need" him to follow Martin. That sounds
more like liability lawyer speak than anything else. They don't tell
you that you "need" to call them in the first place. It doesn't mean
you can't.

But there are "glaring" facts, as well.

Zimmerman called him a racial slur.

No he didn't...
There was none of the usual investigation and forensics done in a death
by shooting.

You don't know that.
No blood splatter evidence taken,

You don't know that.
no trajectory evidence
taken.

You don't know that.
Zimmerman was well known as a loose cannon and also well known to
the police and 911 call center, so much so that they often ignored him.

False media depiction..
The screams once attributed to Zimmerman are not his, they are Martins.

Absolutly false.
It goes on and on.

Yes, the race baiting and lying goes on....

In article , says...

On 4/4/2012 11:17 AM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 10:50:30 AM UTC-4, John H wrote:
...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn


And this is serious "news"? What a joke, but many still believe they are telling us the unbiased truth.

The only thing worse than a racist, is a race baiter. This is about as
low as you can go. If I were Zimmermans Lawyer, I would have to protest
the jury pool has been tainted already, through the intentional actions
of Jackson, Sharpton, MSNBC, CNN, The New York Lies, and on, and on...
This incident should bring MSNBC down for good...

WWWWAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH......

In article , says...

On 4/4/2012 1:28 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:50:30 -0400, Happy
wrote:

...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn

This is not the only place where they have been walking back the
inflammatory rhetoric they were using a week or two ago.

The news has misquoted that conversation in several areas, completely
changing the context and the actual words.

The most glaring lie is that they told him "not to follow" Martin. He
was told that they didn't "need" him to follow Martin. That sounds
more like liability lawyer speak than anything else. They don't tell
you that you "need" to call them in the first place. It doesn't mean
you can't.

But there are "glaring" facts, as well.

Zimmerman called him a racial slur.

No he didn't...
There was none of the usual investigation and forensics done in a death
by shooting.

You don't know that.
No blood splatter evidence taken,

You don't know that.
Yes I do, there was none. The Sanford Police have released what they
did, virtually nothing. Go read for yourself
no trajectory evidence
taken.

You don't know that.

Yes I do, see above.
Zimmerman was well known as a loose cannon and also well known to
the police and 911 call center, so much so that they often ignored him.

False media depiction..

No, it's not false.

The screams once attributed to Zimmerman are not his, they are Martins.

Absolutly false.

Cite?

It goes on and on.

Yes, the race baiting and lying goes on....

YOU are a racist and you know it.

On 4/5/2012 8:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 4/4/2012 1:28 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:50:30 -0400, Happy
wrote:

...what bull****.

http://tinyurl.com/cmgwlsn

This is not the only place where they have been walking back the
inflammatory rhetoric they were using a week or two ago.

The news has misquoted that conversation in several areas, completely
changing the context and the actual words.

The most glaring lie is that they told him "not to follow" Martin. He
was told that they didn't "need" him to follow Martin. That sounds
more like liability lawyer speak than anything else. They don't tell
you that you "need" to call them in the first place. It doesn't mean
you can't.

But there are "glaring" facts, as well.

Zimmerman called him a racial slur.

No he didn't...
There was none of the usual investigation and forensics done in a death
by shooting.

You don't know that.
No blood splatter evidence taken,

You don't know that.
Yes I do, there was none. The Sanford Police have released what they
did, virtually nothing. Go read for yourself
no trajectory evidence
taken.

You don't know that.

Yes I do, see above.
Zimmerman was well known as a loose cannon and also well known to
the police and 911 call center, so much so that they often ignored him.

False media depiction..

No, it's not false.

The screams once attributed to Zimmerman are not his, they are Martins.

Absolutly false.

Cite?

It goes on and on.

Yes, the race baiting and lying goes on....

YOU are a racist and you know it.



Uh, yeah right...