On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:17:29 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , dump-on-
says...

I wonder if these facts coincide with Zimmerman's ever-developing and
changing alibi.

Fact #1 - Trayvon Martin was doing NOTHING wrong. Looking inside cars
parked along the street is not unusual behavior for a young teen-ager,
especially if you don't have a car of your own. Boys look at cars all
the time.

Fact #2 - Martin was UNARMED.

Fact #3 - Zimmerman called 911 to report what he claimed was a
suspicious person.

Fact #4 - The Sanford Police Department told Zimmerman NOT to pursue
Martin and to wait in his vehicle for the responding officer.

Fact #5 - Zimmerman ignored the SPD and CHASED Martin down.

Fact #6 - Zimmerman was slurring his speech (noted by witnesses and 911
operator) was possibly intoxicated. SPD NEVER bothered to test.

Fact #7 - Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tape saying what sounds like
"****ing Coon"

Fact #8 - There may have been a physical altercation and, according to
some witness statements, Trayvon Martin was winning.

Fact #9 - Zimmerman shot Martin.

Fact #10 - Out just today, the lead investigator on the scene the night
of the shooting wanted to arrest Zimmerman for manslaughter, but was
overruled by state officials.

Fact #11 - Zimmerman has been arrested TWICE in the past for violent
crimes. Once in 2005, for assaulting a police officer (plead down to
resisting arrest) and once in 2007, for domestic violence.

Conjecture...the blood on Zimmerman may have been Martin's.

Your fact #2 could only be ascertained after he was dead.

Fact 4 is a lie. Fact 5 is supposition. Facts using the words 'what sounds like' or 'may have been'
aren't 'facts'. They're more bull****.