Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:01:31 -0500, X ` Man
wrote: The only possibility for change is to get the money out of politics...and how the hell is that supposed to happen? === Term limits would be a good start. What limits do you have in mind? Why do you think limits would stop the flow of funds? What evidence do you have to offer? ===== Most, if not all, of the money in politics comes in the form of re-election contributions. The reason is simple: Direct bribes are illegal but re-election assistance is not only legal but necessary. Media advertising costs a lot and that is not going to change. With some reasonable term limit (something like 2 terms, same as the presidency) there would presumably be less need for re-election funding and less opportunity for establishing an entrenched power base. Too many of our current legislators look at it as a career opportunity. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
28% Think Cain Had Affair; 28% Dont Think Cain Had Affair; 44% Having Affair with Cain Right Now | General | |||
Herman Cain... | General | |||
Third Shoe Drops on Cain | General | |||
Cain, a different direction | General |