On 28-Nov-2011, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.

Correct - no one cares - you'll be getting the current asshole for 4
additional years. It will be funny watching the violent demise, if you're
not IN what remains of the former United States. Don't fret - there's
nothing you can do, or are willing to do about it.

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:40:25 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 28-Nov-2011, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.

Correct - no one cares - you'll be getting the current asshole for 4
additional years. It will be funny watching the violent demise, if you're
not IN what remains of the former United States. Don't fret - there's
nothing you can do, or are willing to do about it.

Says the mercantile whore who left and now points his finger at those
who remain. Bully for you.

On 11/28/11 6:26 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.



Oh...I'm not a woman, Whiner, so Cain's sexual aggressiveness doesn't
concern me. I just think it is fun to point out the hypocrisy of these
right-wing nutcase Republican "family values" candidates.

Oh, and in the area of womanizing, he's the exact sort of hypocrite as
Newt. Perhaps it isn't in your household, but up here cheating on your
wife is considered hypocrisy. among other things. I will say, though,
that when pressed, Newt 'fessed. Cain is still deep in denial.

You Republicans have some interesting presidential nominee candidates
this year. Interesting, interesting.

On 11/29/2011 9:39 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/28/11 6:26 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.



Oh...I'm not a woman, Whiner, so Cain's sexual aggressiveness doesn't
concern me. I just think it is fun to point out the hypocrisy of these
right-wing nutcase Republican "family values" candidates.

Oh, and in the area of womanizing, he's the exact sort of hypocrite as
Newt. Perhaps it isn't in your household, but up here cheating on your
wife is considered hypocrisy. among other things. I will say, though,
that when pressed, Newt 'fessed. Cain is still deep in denial.

You Republicans have some interesting presidential nominee candidates
this year. Interesting, interesting.

nobody has been charged or convicted of anything. All you have is the
usual crowd (Alred and co.) smearing republicans and blacks as usual....

In article ,
says...

On 11/29/2011 9:39 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/28/11 6:26 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.



Oh...I'm not a woman, Whiner, so Cain's sexual aggressiveness doesn't
concern me. I just think it is fun to point out the hypocrisy of these
right-wing nutcase Republican "family values" candidates.

Oh, and in the area of womanizing, he's the exact sort of hypocrite as
Newt. Perhaps it isn't in your household, but up here cheating on your
wife is considered hypocrisy. among other things. I will say, though,
that when pressed, Newt 'fessed. Cain is still deep in denial.

You Republicans have some interesting presidential nominee candidates
this year. Interesting, interesting.

nobody has been charged or convicted of anything. All you have is the
usual crowd (Alred and co.) smearing republicans and blacks as usual....

Yup, as usual, any liberal that even looks sideways is guilty of
everything under the sun, but if it's a teabagger, even though the woman
came forward, he's just a great guy. Now, I do believe the facts need to
be found out before making any conclusions EITHER WAY. But you've just
stated that it's nothing but smear and you don't know that, anymore than
any liberal knows that he's guilty.

On 11/29/11 10:19 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/29/2011 9:39 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/28/11 6:26 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.



Oh...I'm not a woman, Whiner, so Cain's sexual aggressiveness doesn't
concern me. I just think it is fun to point out the hypocrisy of these
right-wing nutcase Republican "family values" candidates.

Oh, and in the area of womanizing, he's the exact sort of hypocrite as
Newt. Perhaps it isn't in your household, but up here cheating on your
wife is considered hypocrisy. among other things. I will say, though,
that when pressed, Newt 'fessed. Cain is still deep in denial.

You Republicans have some interesting presidential nominee candidates
this year. Interesting, interesting.

nobody has been charged or convicted of anything. All you have is the
usual crowd (Alred and co.) smearing republicans and blacks as usual....

The sexual harassment claims against Cain that have come up to date
probably are beyond the statute of limitations for criminal legal
action, and the latest revelation, the affair, doesn't sound like
anything that would result in a "charge" or "conviction."

When these right-wing ultra conservative Republicans who preach family
values get pulled up by the short hairs for their hypocrisy, especially
in matters sexual, they simply get what they deserve.

I've called Newt Gingrich a ****head any number of times for his
disloyalty to his wives, and for his extralegal political activities.
Last time I checked, he wasn't black.

So, as usual, you are in over your head. Which, short as you are,
happens to you frequently.






--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:55:42 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:26:13 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.

What I take away from all of this is that everybody making excuses for
Herman Cain is also excusing Bill Clinton.

Personally, I don't think it means anything with respect to Cain or
Clinton. Cain seems to have a better handle on telling the media to
stuff it, which is the proper response. Clinton should have been smart
enough to have done the same.

However, the big thing is the incredibly obvious double standard
evolving between, your guy is immoral, wrong, and a threat to national
security, my guy, well, guys will be guys.

Herman had to be living in some kind of fantasy world to believe that
some of this crap wasn't going to bubble up if he ran for office. I
hope this isn't news to his wife. What a disaster.

I'm sad that he didn't get the nomination before this woman came
forward. It would have been fantastic watching Republicans dance
around on hot coals, trying to maintain the mantle of moral
superiority.

It certainly serves as further proof that Republican leadership will
never hold themselves to the same standards to which they hold others.

On 11/28/2011 7:19 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:55:42 -0500, wrote:


It certainly serves as further proof that Republican leadership will
never hold themselves to the same standards to which they hold others.

Only in the mind of a liar like you....

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:58:05 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:19:04 -0800, jps wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:55:42 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:26:13 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.

What I take away from all of this is that everybody making excuses for
Herman Cain is also excusing Bill Clinton.

Personally, I don't think it means anything with respect to Cain or
Clinton. Cain seems to have a better handle on telling the media to
stuff it, which is the proper response. Clinton should have been smart
enough to have done the same.

However, the big thing is the incredibly obvious double standard
evolving between, your guy is immoral, wrong, and a threat to national
security, my guy, well, guys will be guys.

Herman had to be living in some kind of fantasy world to believe that
some of this crap wasn't going to bubble up if he ran for office. I
hope this isn't news to his wife. What a disaster.

That is very true. Some people think they have, somehow, advanced
beyond reality. The wives usually know. He may have had her
permission. Not my business, but nobody wants (or should want) this to
be a family battle.

I'm sad that he didn't get the nomination before this woman came
forward. It would have been fantastic watching Republicans dance
around on hot coals, trying to maintain the mantle of moral
superiority.

I do hope this faux morality is seen for what it is.

It certainly serves as further proof that Republican leadership will
never hold themselves to the same standards to which they hold others.

Once the Republican Conservative movement bought into Conservative
Christianity (for votes) they bought themselves this huge problem. One
day, they will figure out that politics and religion don't mix, unless
you have a social structure that will support notions like the Taliban
or they will just fail.

Republicans would be pleased with a theocracy, as long as it was the
theocracy they bought into and only until it started to rule
everything, like a giant bloated government that didn't have to
account for anything, since their mandate would be from God.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:55:42 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:26:13 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:52:41 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

Woman says she and Cain had 13-year affair

===

Does anyone really care? I certainly don't. You must be worried
about him however, posting all of this racist crap of yours. He may
not be qualified in other respects but at least he's not a hypocrite
like Newt.

What I take away from all of this is that everybody making excuses for
Herman Cain is also excusing Bill Clinton.

Personally, I don't think it means anything with respect to Cain or
Clinton. Cain seems to have a better handle on telling the media to
stuff it, which is the proper response. Clinton should have been smart
enough to have done the same.

However, the big thing is the incredibly obvious double standard
evolving between, your guy is immoral, wrong, and a threat to national
security, my guy, well, guys will be guys.

Who made an excuse? I've not seen it.

If Cain took advantage of his position to have sex with an employee, then he doesn't deserve the
presidency, in my opinion. The same opinion was held with regard to Clinton. With Clinton, it was a
fact. With Cain nothing has been close to proven.

Note, there are many, many liberal Christians who believe in 'family values'. Those beliefs don't
prevent ****ty behavior.