On 28/11/2011 1:28 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/28/11 3:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:07:51 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 11/28/11 3:01 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:00:53 -0500, wrote:



If you had the IQ of an idiot and/or the mental maturity of a 12 year
old, you would know the burden of verification lies with YOU not John,
Rush, O'Reilly, John Burch, or anybody else. WITH YOU.

Besides, there was nothing racist about the post. The guy happened
to be black. If he had been white
the issues would have been the same. Get off your high horse.


Bull****. If the guy had been white, you wouldn't have posted it.

You're wrong again, Harry. But that's nothing new!


No, I'm not wrong. You frequently post crap here that attempts to
portray blacks and other minorities in a bad light, and you usually get
high-fives from the rest of the ignorant racists here.

Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

You can deny all you like, Herring, but you are a racist.

Nope, you are using race as a crutch. Just a racist bull****er.

You also claim to be a Christian. Really? Would a follower of the
teachings of Jesus make the sorts of posts you make regarding blacks,
Latinos and other minorities?

I doubt it.

Hand up or hand out? I doubt necessity is driving these pparsites to
want a hand up. Just whine for hand outs.

--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

On 28/11/2011 4:14 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700,
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

Many employers do. Should do that with welfare too, convert it to
workfare with drug tests.
--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:14:10 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

I agree with that post. Anyone using illegal drugs should suffer the threat of losing a job. Perhaps
that would lower demand somewhat.

On 11/29/2011 9:56 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:14:10 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700,
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

I agree with that post. Anyone using illegal drugs should suffer the threat of losing a job. Perhaps
that would lower demand somewhat.

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

--
1-20-13 The end of an error

"Drifter" wrote in message
b.com...

On 11/29/2011 9:56 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:14:10 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700,
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

I agree with that post. Anyone using illegal drugs should suffer the
threat of losing a job. Perhaps
that would lower demand somewhat.

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

--
1-20-13 The end of an error


------------------------------------

loss of welfare payments.

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:43:31 -0800, "Califbill" wrote:

"Drifter" wrote in message
eb.com...

On 11/29/2011 9:56 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:14:10 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700,
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

I agree with that post. Anyone using illegal drugs should suffer the
threat of losing a job. Perhaps
that would lower demand somewhat.

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

And they should be taking drug tests also.

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:43:31 -0800, "Califbill"
wrote:

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

===

If they consent to being sent off to an island somewhere, we should
give them all the free drugs they want. If they don't consent, jail.

Is it constitutional, ethical or practical? Don't know.

Is there an island big enough? Don't know that either.

Maybe we could annex the city of Detroit and build a wall around it.
Just about everyone left there is using drugs anyway.

Someone just came out with a study that shows that the crime rate in
an area drops when the price of cocaine drops. If the price dropped
to zero, would drug crime go to zero also? Interesting experiment.
Maybe we should pick a city like Detroit and do a test. Some people
would move there on their own, wouldn't have to be sent.

Some European countries do something similar with a registered addict
program. We need some creative thinking about the drug issue because
what we're doing now certainly isn't working.

On 11/30/11 2:02 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:43:31 -0800, "Califbill"
wrote:

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

===

If they consent to being sent off to an island somewhere, we should
give them all the free drugs they want. If they don't consent, jail.


Good solution for the corporation execs, banks, and wall street whores
who have robbed this country of its future. You could ferry them to the
island. Herring could prepare their meals. iSnotty could be Nick Nack,
the dwarf manservant.