On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:07:51 -0500, X ` Man wrote:

On 11/28/11 3:01 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:00:53 -0500, wrote:



If you had the IQ of an idiot and/or the mental maturity of a 12 year
old, you would know the burden of verification lies with YOU not John,
Rush, O'Reilly, John Burch, or anybody else. WITH YOU.

Besides, there was nothing racist about the post. The guy happened to be black. If he had been white
the issues would have been the same. Get off your high horse.


Bull****. If the guy had been white, you wouldn't have posted it.

You're wrong again, Harry. But that's nothing new!

On 11/28/11 3:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:07:51 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 11/28/11 3:01 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:00:53 -0500, wrote:



If you had the IQ of an idiot and/or the mental maturity of a 12 year
old, you would know the burden of verification lies with YOU not John,
Rush, O'Reilly, John Burch, or anybody else. WITH YOU.

Besides, there was nothing racist about the post. The guy happened to be black. If he had been white
the issues would have been the same. Get off your high horse.


Bull****. If the guy had been white, you wouldn't have posted it.

You're wrong again, Harry. But that's nothing new!


No, I'm not wrong. You frequently post crap here that attempts to
portray blacks and other minorities in a bad light, and you usually get
high-fives from the rest of the ignorant racists here.

You can deny all you like, Herring, but you are a racist.

You also claim to be a Christian. Really? Would a follower of the
teachings of Jesus make the sorts of posts you make regarding blacks,
Latinos and other minorities?

I doubt it.

--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug

On 28/11/2011 1:28 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/28/11 3:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:07:51 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 11/28/11 3:01 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:00:53 -0500, wrote:



If you had the IQ of an idiot and/or the mental maturity of a 12 year
old, you would know the burden of verification lies with YOU not John,
Rush, O'Reilly, John Burch, or anybody else. WITH YOU.

Besides, there was nothing racist about the post. The guy happened
to be black. If he had been white
the issues would have been the same. Get off your high horse.


Bull****. If the guy had been white, you wouldn't have posted it.

You're wrong again, Harry. But that's nothing new!


No, I'm not wrong. You frequently post crap here that attempts to
portray blacks and other minorities in a bad light, and you usually get
high-fives from the rest of the ignorant racists here.

Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

You can deny all you like, Herring, but you are a racist.

Nope, you are using race as a crutch. Just a racist bull****er.

You also claim to be a Christian. Really? Would a follower of the
teachings of Jesus make the sorts of posts you make regarding blacks,
Latinos and other minorities?

I doubt it.

Hand up or hand out? I doubt necessity is driving these pparsites to
want a hand up. Just whine for hand outs.

--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

On 28/11/2011 4:14 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700,
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

Many employers do. Should do that with welfare too, convert it to
workfare with drug tests.
--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:14:10 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

I agree with that post. Anyone using illegal drugs should suffer the threat of losing a job. Perhaps
that would lower demand somewhat.

On 11/29/2011 9:56 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:14:10 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700,
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

I agree with that post. Anyone using illegal drugs should suffer the threat of losing a job. Perhaps
that would lower demand somewhat.

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

--
1-20-13 The end of an error

"Drifter" wrote in message
b.com...

On 11/29/2011 9:56 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:14:10 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700,
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

I agree with that post. Anyone using illegal drugs should suffer the
threat of losing a job. Perhaps
that would lower demand somewhat.

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

--
1-20-13 The end of an error


------------------------------------

loss of welfare payments.

On 11/28/2011 3:28 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/28/11 3:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:07:51 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 11/28/11 3:01 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:00:53 -0500, wrote:



If you had the IQ of an idiot and/or the mental maturity of a 12 year
old, you would know the burden of verification lies with YOU not John,
Rush, O'Reilly, John Burch, or anybody else. WITH YOU.

Besides, there was nothing racist about the post. The guy happened
to be black. If he had been white
the issues would have been the same. Get off your high horse.


Bull****. If the guy had been white, you wouldn't have posted it.

You're wrong again, Harry. But that's nothing new!


No, I'm not wrong. You frequently post crap here that attempts to
portray blacks and other minorities in a bad light, and you usually get
high-fives from the rest of the ignorant racists here.

You can deny all you like, Herring, but you are a racist.

You also claim to be a Christian. Really? Would a follower of the
teachings of Jesus make the sorts of posts you make regarding blacks,
Latinos and other minorities?

I doubt it.


You are a bat**** crazy loon. You have absolutely no verifiable data to
support your claims.

--
1-20-13 The end of an error

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:28:43 -0500, X ` Man wrote:

On 11/28/11 3:23 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:07:51 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 11/28/11 3:01 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:00:53 -0500, wrote:



If you had the IQ of an idiot and/or the mental maturity of a 12 year
old, you would know the burden of verification lies with YOU not John,
Rush, O'Reilly, John Burch, or anybody else. WITH YOU.

Besides, there was nothing racist about the post. The guy happened to be black. If he had been white
the issues would have been the same. Get off your high horse.


Bull****. If the guy had been white, you wouldn't have posted it.

You're wrong again, Harry. But that's nothing new!


No, I'm not wrong. You frequently post crap here that attempts to
portray blacks and other minorities in a bad light, and you usually get
high-fives from the rest of the ignorant racists here.

You can deny all you like, Herring, but you are a racist.

You also claim to be a Christian. Really? Would a follower of the
teachings of Jesus make the sorts of posts you make regarding blacks,
Latinos and other minorities?

I doubt it.

More bull****. Find a similar incident with a white guy and I'll post it in a heartbeat. Using one's
dick to take advantage of the liberal's welfare state is beneath contempt - no matter the color.

Find me a case where 50 white folk have invaded a store to rob it, and I'll post that in a heartbeat
also!

Get your head out of your anal orifice.