the right wing has been bitching about the supposed 47% who don't pay
federal income taxes

turns out that 47% are

republicans!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/print/283265

The ten states with the highest number of non-payers are a strongly
Republican bunch: Eight of them went for John McCain in 2008, and nine
of them have Republican governors. Keith Hennessey, an economic
adviser in George W. Bush’s administration, notes that the historical
data suggest that the child credit was the main reason for the
increase in the number of non-payers between 1995 and 2007


HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:44:42 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

the right wing has been bitching about the supposed 47% who don't pay
federal income taxes

turns out that 47% are

republicans!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/print/283265

The ten states with the highest number of non-payers are a strongly
Republican bunch: Eight of them went for John McCain in 2008, and nine
of them have Republican governors. Keith Hennessey, an economic
adviser in George W. Bush’s administration, notes that the historical
data suggest that the child credit was the main reason for the
increase in the number of non-payers between 1995 and 2007


HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

Hey, I notice the sound of crickets filling the air.

I'll bet your detractors think it's patriotic not to pay your taxes if
you don't agree with how the money is spent.

On 11/23/2011 8:44 PM, bpuharic wrote:
the right wing has been bitching about the supposed 47% who don't pay
federal income taxes

turns out that 47% are

republicans!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/print/283265

The ten states with the highest number of non-payers are a strongly
Republican bunch: Eight of them went for John McCain in 2008, and nine
of them have Republican governors. Keith Hennessey, an economic
adviser in George W. Bush’s administration, notes that the historical
data suggest that the child credit was the main reason for the
increase in the number of non-payers between 1995 and 2007


HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

You kno I've had it with politics.
They have been running, or a couple anyway, for next years election, for
a year already.
Every time I read about it is like reading a preposterous comic strip.
Only problem is they want to run the Country for us or whom?
They aren't talking about fixing the problems but just keeping the game
going.
Anyone fishing or doing something to their boat?

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:51:46 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:44:42 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

the right wing has been bitching about the supposed 47% who don't pay
federal income taxes

turns out that 47% are

republicans!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/print/283265

The ten states with the highest number of non-payers are a strongly
Republican bunch: Eight of them went for John McCain in 2008, and nine
of them have Republican governors. Keith Hennessey, an economic
adviser in George W. Bush’s administration, notes that the historical
data suggest that the child credit was the main reason for the
increase in the number of non-payers between 1995 and 2007


HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

Hey, I notice the sound of crickets filling the air.

I'll bet your detractors think it's patriotic not to pay your taxes if
you don't agree with how the money is spent.

i figure they're just trying to figure how to spin this

On 24/11/2011 1:51 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:44:42 -0500, wrote:

the right wing has been bitching about the supposed 47% who don't pay
federal income taxes

turns out that 47% are

republicans!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/print/283265

The ten states with the highest number of non-payers are a strongly
Republican bunch: Eight of them went for John McCain in 2008, and nine
of them have Republican governors. Keith Hennessey, an economic
adviser in George W. Bush’s administration, notes that the historical
data suggest that the child credit was the main reason for the
increase in the number of non-payers between 1995 and 2007


HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

Hey, I notice the sound of crickets filling the air.

I'll
bet your detractors think it's patriotic not to pay your taxes if
you don't agree with how the money is spent.

I will spin it.

USA and Canada need to look at a right to value and maximum tax
liability a person should get. And define it from all sources.

How much is fair? Come now fleabaggers, from all sources how much
should a person have to pay as a maximum liability?

For example, a company makes a buck. pays 35 cents. Leaving 65 cents.
Pays that in dividend. Taxpayer pays 28% on that for over 50% taxes.

Ok, say 50%.

Then why not tax your welfare check 50%. You contribute ****, just
take, hell, tax your welfare 50%.

But wait, it is really about your envy and greed isn't it?
--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:05:46 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/11/2011 1:51 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:44:42 -0500, wrote:

the right wing has been bitching about the supposed 47% who don't pay
federal income taxes

turns out that 47% are
I will spin it.

USA and Canada need to look at a right to value and maximum tax
liability a person should get. And define it from all sources.

How much is fair? Come now fleabaggers, from all sources how much
should a person have to pay as a maximum liability?

For example, a company makes a buck. pays 35 cents. Leaving 65 cents.
Pays that in dividend. Taxpayer pays 28% on that for over 50% taxes.

actually they dont. the effective tax on companies in the US is lower
than the OECD average

but he's a socialist living in a country where they have 'socialized'
medicine while he preaches socialism for the rich

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:37:25 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:11:29 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

actually they dont. the effective tax on companies in the US is lower
than the OECD average

You sure do like having it both ways. You just spent 3 days telling me
the highest marginal rate was the only thing that was important and
you didn't care about the effective rate.

correct. because the *******ization of the tax system shows how
corrupted it's become. you just can't read, can you? we need to lower
corporate taxes coupled with eliminating the socialst freeloading
causing middle class taxpayers to subsidize millionaires.

you socialists really have no idea what's going on do you?

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:34:36 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:37:25 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:11:29 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

actually they dont. the effective tax on companies in the US is lower
than the OECD average

You sure do like having it both ways. You just spent 3 days telling me
the highest marginal rate was the only thing that was important and
you didn't care about the effective rate.

correct. because the *******ization of the tax system shows how
corrupted it's become. you just can't read, can you? we need to lower
corporate taxes coupled with eliminating the socialst freeloading
causing middle class taxpayers to subsidize millionaires.

you socialists really have no idea what's going on do you?

Is the *******ization of the tax system the reason you spent three days on the importance of the
marginal rate versus the effective rate?

Or...was that simply some stupidity?

Are you sure you're not supposed to be in Italy buying a sailboat or skiing in Rome or something?

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:15 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:34:36 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:37:25 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:11:29 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

actually they dont. the effective tax on companies in the US is lower
than the OECD average

You sure do like having it both ways. You just spent 3 days telling me
the highest marginal rate was the only thing that was important and
you didn't care about the effective rate.

correct. because the *******ization of the tax system shows how
corrupted it's become. you just can't read, can you? we need to lower
corporate taxes coupled with eliminating the socialst freeloading
causing middle class taxpayers to subsidize millionaires.

you socialists really have no idea what's going on do you?

Is the *******ization of the tax system the reason you spent three days on the importance of the
marginal rate versus the effective rate?

Or...was that simply some stupidity?

Are you sure you're not supposed to be in Italy buying a sailboat or skiing in Rome or something?

the nice thing about the right wing is their insistence on simplicity.
that way they dont have to deal with facts

the right bitches and moans about how much taxes corporations pay.
they HIDE the fact corporations dont

they insist the rich create jobs when their taxes are cut. except they
dont.

the reason people dont pay at 25 or 28% is because there are
deductions. some people get these...some dont. i dont get a dependent
deduction because i dont have kids. so individuals' tax rates vary
widely

corporations dont. rich people dont. they dont pay the taxes the right
says they do. the right just lies. they lie when they say the rich
create jobs. they lie when they say corporate taxes are high

individuals tax rates are highly variable. but to the right, that's
not part of the story because faux new doesnt care about the middle
class

you guys are too stupid to be liberal. that's why you're right wing

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:41:25 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:15 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:34:36 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:37:25 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:11:29 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

actually they dont. the effective tax on companies in the US is lower
than the OECD average

You sure do like having it both ways. You just spent 3 days telling me
the highest marginal rate was the only thing that was important and
you didn't care about the effective rate.

correct. because the *******ization of the tax system shows how
corrupted it's become. you just can't read, can you? we need to lower
corporate taxes coupled with eliminating the socialst freeloading
causing middle class taxpayers to subsidize millionaires.

you socialists really have no idea what's going on do you?

Is the *******ization of the tax system the reason you spent three days on the importance of the
marginal rate versus the effective rate?

Or...was that simply some stupidity?

Are you sure you're not supposed to be in Italy buying a sailboat or skiing in Rome or something?

the nice thing about the right wing is their insistence on simplicity.
that way they dont have to deal with facts

the right bitches and moans about how much taxes corporations pay.
they HIDE the fact corporations dont

they insist the rich create jobs when their taxes are cut. except they
dont.

the reason people dont pay at 25 or 28% is because there are
deductions. some people get these...some dont. i dont get a dependent
deduction because i dont have kids. so individuals' tax rates vary
widely

corporations dont. rich people dont. they dont pay the taxes the right
says they do. the right just lies. they lie when they say the rich
create jobs. they lie when they say corporate taxes are high

individuals tax rates are highly variable. but to the right, that's
not part of the story because faux new doesnt care about the middle
class

you guys are too stupid to be liberal. that's why you're right wing

Nah, we're just like the Honey Badger....

"Honey Badger don't give a **** about mouthy socialists."