On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:41:25 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:15 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:34:36 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:37:25 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:11:29 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

actually they dont. the effective tax on companies in the US is lower
than the OECD average

You sure do like having it both ways. You just spent 3 days telling me
the highest marginal rate was the only thing that was important and
you didn't care about the effective rate.

correct. because the *******ization of the tax system shows how
corrupted it's become. you just can't read, can you? we need to lower
corporate taxes coupled with eliminating the socialst freeloading
causing middle class taxpayers to subsidize millionaires.

you socialists really have no idea what's going on do you?

Is the *******ization of the tax system the reason you spent three days on the importance of the
marginal rate versus the effective rate?

Or...was that simply some stupidity?

Are you sure you're not supposed to be in Italy buying a sailboat or skiing in Rome or something?

the nice thing about the right wing is their insistence on simplicity.
that way they dont have to deal with facts

the right bitches and moans about how much taxes corporations pay.
they HIDE the fact corporations dont

they insist the rich create jobs when their taxes are cut. except they
dont.

the reason people dont pay at 25 or 28% is because there are
deductions. some people get these...some dont. i dont get a dependent
deduction because i dont have kids. so individuals' tax rates vary
widely

corporations dont. rich people dont. they dont pay the taxes the right
says they do. the right just lies. they lie when they say the rich
create jobs. they lie when they say corporate taxes are high

individuals tax rates are highly variable. but to the right, that's
not part of the story because faux new doesnt care about the middle
class

you guys are too stupid to be liberal. that's why you're right wing

Nah, we're just like the Honey Badger....

"Honey Badger don't give a **** about mouthy socialists."

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:52:33 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:41:25 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:15 -0500, John H
wrote:

individuals tax rates are highly variable. but to the right, that's
not part of the story because faux new doesnt care about the middle
class

you guys are too stupid to be liberal. that's why you're right wing

Nah, we're just like the Honey Badger....

"Honey Badger don't give a **** about mouthy socialists."

then why do you bail them out?

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:46:19 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:52:33 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:41:25 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:15 -0500, John H
wrote:

individuals tax rates are highly variable. but to the right, that's
not part of the story because faux new doesnt care about the middle
class

you guys are too stupid to be liberal. that's why you're right wing

Nah, we're just like the Honey Badger....

"Honey Badger don't give a **** about mouthy socialists."

then why do you bail them out?

How many people *do* have jobs?

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 12:25:48 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:46:19 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:52:33 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:41:25 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:15 -0500, John H
wrote:

individuals tax rates are highly variable. but to the right, that's
not part of the story because faux new doesnt care about the middle
class

you guys are too stupid to be liberal. that's why you're right wing

Nah, we're just like the Honey Badger....

"Honey Badger don't give a **** about mouthy socialists."

then why do you bail them out?

How many people *do* have jobs?

fine. let's increase capital gains to 30% and well still have the same
number of j obs AND more tax revenue

OK?

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:49:13 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 12:25:48 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:46:19 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:52:33 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:41:25 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:15 -0500, John H
wrote:

individuals tax rates are highly variable. but to the right, that's
not part of the story because faux new doesnt care about the middle
class

you guys are too stupid to be liberal. that's why you're right wing

Nah, we're just like the Honey Badger....

"Honey Badger don't give a **** about mouthy socialists."

then why do you bail them out?

How many people *do* have jobs?

fine. let's increase capital gains to 30% and well still have the same
number of j obs AND more tax revenue

OK?

You've shown you can't answer a question. I'd love it if my capital gains increased to 30%. Shoot, I
wouldn't even mind paying the taxes on the increase.

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:30:47 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:49:13 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

Nah, we're just like the Honey Badger....

"Honey Badger don't give a **** about mouthy socialists."

then why do you bail them out?

How many people *do* have jobs?

fine. let's increase capital gains to 30% and well still have the same
number of j obs AND more tax revenue

OK?

You've shown you can't answer a question. I'd love it if my capital gains increased to 30%. Shoot, I
wouldn't even mind paying the taxes on the increase.

you've shown you can't back up your argument

it's your contention lowering capital gains taxes creates jobs

where are the jobs??