On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:15:30 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:23:43 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:04:54 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


Send US money to other countries to build up their industry?

HAHAHAHA

have you LOOKED at the chinese economy??

WE'RE ALREADY DOING THAT YOU MORON!!

christ you're as dumb as a bag of rocks


No. But he sure stepped into that one with a blindfold on.
Except for stockholders and those working on Wall Street -
an ever-decreasing class in the U.S. - capital used to build foreign
factories and businesses does nothing for U.S. unemployment.
In fact, it's detrimental to U.S. employment.
Wall Street should just wholesale relocate to China.
That way nobody will complain about it.
And it might very well happen.
Wouldn't bother me.

you know i wouldnt mind how ****ing rich the rich got if we ALL got
richer AND we all had jobs. inequality is a natural result in a mature
developed economy

BUT the right worships inequality of OPPORTUNITY, and will work to
preserve the privileged regardless of the costs to the econoomy. they
just simply refuse to look at the evidence. he keeps bleating the same
failed arguments over and over...

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 00:51:44 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:29:48 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:15:30 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

Wall Street should just wholesale relocate to China.
That way nobody will complain about it.
And it might very well happen.
Wouldn't bother me.

you know i wouldnt mind how ****ing rich the rich got if we ALL got
richer AND we all had jobs. inequality is a natural result in a mature
developed economy

BUT the right worships inequality of OPPORTUNITY, and will work to
preserve the privileged regardless of the costs to the econoomy. they
just simply refuse to look at the evidence. he keeps bleating the same
failed arguments over and over...

If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come
from? Who will bring your food to you, where will the energy come
from? How will you be able to bitch about your miserable life on the
internet without the companies who built the internet infrastructure?

you True Believers in the wall street cult are socialists. you insist
the middle class has to support and bankroll the rich while ensuring
the rich NEVER have to bear ANY burdens at all

when will you realize SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK!! you socialists dont
get it.

NO ONE is talking about DESTROYING corporations. it's NATURAL for
corporations to fail but you SOCIALISTS insist that corporations be
unregulated and when they DO fail you INSIST they be bankrolled to
protect the rich

SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK. YOU are a SOCIALIST.

only CAPITALISM works. and capitalism relies on EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR
ALL. you SOCIALISTS think only the rich should be protected.

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:39:15 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 00:51:44 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:29:48 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:15:30 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

Wall Street should just wholesale relocate to China.
That way nobody will complain about it.
And it might very well happen.
Wouldn't bother me.

you know i wouldnt mind how ****ing rich the rich got if we ALL got
richer AND we all had jobs. inequality is a natural result in a mature
developed economy

BUT the right worships inequality of OPPORTUNITY, and will work to
preserve the privileged regardless of the costs to the econoomy. they
just simply refuse to look at the evidence. he keeps bleating the same
failed arguments over and over...

If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come
from? Who will bring your food to you, where will the energy come
from? How will you be able to bitch about your miserable life on the
internet without the companies who built the internet infrastructure?

you True Believers in the wall street cult are socialists. you insist
the middle class has to support and bankroll the rich while ensuring
the rich NEVER have to bear ANY burdens at all

when will you realize SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK!! you socialists dont
get it.

NO ONE is talking about DESTROYING corporations. it's NATURAL for
corporations to fail but you SOCIALISTS insist that corporations be
unregulated and when they DO fail you INSIST they be bankrolled to
protect the rich

SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK. YOU are a SOCIALIST.

only CAPITALISM works. and capitalism relies on EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR
ALL. you SOCIALISTS think only the rich should be protected.

****. I was really hoping to see the answer to Greg's question, "If you destroy all of the
corporations, where will those jobs come from?"

You could easily have said, "The government will provide the jobs once it owns the factories and the
farms."

But you didn't.

Now go back and try to ATFQ! (The 'Q' stands for 'Question'.)

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:21:59 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:39:15 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK. YOU are a SOCIALIST.

only CAPITALISM works. and capitalism relies on EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR
ALL. you SOCIALISTS think only the rich should be protected.

****. I was really hoping to see the answer to Greg's question, "If you destroy all of the
corporations, where will those jobs come from?"

let's see...under corporate socialism that you guys push

corporations are sitting on record profits

how's that working out for the middle class? how's unemployment? you
socialists destroyed jobs

how many jobs did that create?

you guys are so stupid you cant even see the contradictions in your
own arguments.

You could easily have said, "The government will provide the jobs once it owns the factories and the
farms."

But you didn't.

you could have said corporations would create jobs when they make
record profits AND get low taxes

oh...wait...we DID give corporations EXACTLY that

uh...how's the job situation??


Now go back and try to ATFQ! (The 'Q' stands for 'Question'.)

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:43:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:21:59 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:39:15 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK. YOU are a SOCIALIST.

only CAPITALISM works. and capitalism relies on EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR
ALL. you SOCIALISTS think only the rich should be protected.

****. I was really hoping to see the answer to Greg's question, "If you destroy all of the
corporations, where will those jobs come from?"

let's see...under corporate socialism that you guys push

corporations are sitting on record profits

how's that working out for the middle class? how's unemployment? you
socialists destroyed jobs

how many jobs did that create?

you guys are so stupid you cant even see the contradictions in your
own arguments.

You could easily have said, "The government will provide the jobs once it owns the factories and the
farms."

But you didn't.

you could have said corporations would create jobs when they make
record profits AND get low taxes

oh...wait...we DID give corporations EXACTLY that

uh...how's the job situation??


Now go back and try to ATFQ! (The 'Q' stands for 'Question'.)

Uh, how many people have jobs? Some entity must be providing them. Are all the workers in this
country *really* working for the government?

BTW, you still didn't answer Greg's question. Is it too difficult for you?

"If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come from?"

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:43:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:21:59 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:39:15 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK. YOU are a SOCIALIST.

only CAPITALISM works. and capitalism relies on EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR
ALL. you SOCIALISTS think only the rich should be protected.

****. I was really hoping to see the answer to Greg's question, "If you destroy all of the
corporations, where will those jobs come from?"

let's see...under corporate socialism that you guys push

corporations are sitting on record profits

how's that working out for the middle class? how's unemployment? you
socialists destroyed jobs

how many jobs did that create?

you guys are so stupid you cant even see the contradictions in your
own arguments.

You could easily have said, "The government will provide the jobs once it owns the factories and the
farms."

But you didn't.

you could have said corporations would create jobs when they make
record profits AND get low taxes

oh...wait...we DID give corporations EXACTLY that

uh...how's the job situation??


Now go back and try to ATFQ! (The 'Q' stands for 'Question'.)

Uh, how many people have jobs? Some entity must be providing them. Are all the workers in this
country *really* working for the government?

BTW, you still didn't answer Greg's question. Is it too difficult for you?

"If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come from?"

Daddy government of course.

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:49:05 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:43:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


Now go back and try to ATFQ! (The 'Q' stands for 'Question'.)

Uh, how many people have jobs? Some entity must be providing them. Are all the workers in this
country *really* working for the government?

BTW, you still didn't answer Greg's question. Is it too difficult for you?

"If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come from?"

Daddy government of course.


corporations ARE the govt

we are taxed to bail them out. but the right wing is fine with
that....

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:50:39 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:43:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:21:59 -0500, John H
wrote:


you could have said corporations would create jobs when they make
record profits AND get low taxes

oh...wait...we DID give corporations EXACTLY that

uh...how's the job situation??


Now go back and try to ATFQ! (The 'Q' stands for 'Question'.)

Uh, how many people have jobs? Some entity must be providing them. Are all the workers in this
country *really* working for the government?

uh...how many jobs were created by the tax cut for the rich?

oh. MINUS 10 million

to the right wing a NEGATIVE number is positive if it affects the
middle class


BTW, you still didn't answer Greg's question. Is it too difficult for you?

"If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come from?"


you socialists destroy corporations

we capitalists create them

and you might want to read what a CONSERVATIVE NOBEL PRIZE WINNER
says:

http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/index.html

The rich bankers and others who took large risks should have taken
much larger haircuts. I have also supported from the beginning of the
recession higher capital requirements for banks, especially for the
large “too big to fail banks” that will be bailed out if they get into
financial difficulties.


gary becker is a nobel prize winning CONSERVATIVE economist

he's concerned about inequality

he's concerned that the financial sector has consumed HUGE resources
with little return

he's concerned that there are too few regulations on large banks

he's CONSERVATIVE

i'm a LIBERAL and i have the same concerns

you right wing socialists dont care.

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:50:24 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:50:39 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:43:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:21:59 -0500, John H
wrote:


you could have said corporations would create jobs when they make
record profits AND get low taxes

oh...wait...we DID give corporations EXACTLY that

uh...how's the job situation??


Now go back and try to ATFQ! (The 'Q' stands for 'Question'.)

Uh, how many people have jobs? Some entity must be providing them. Are all the workers in this
country *really* working for the government?

uh...how many jobs were created by the tax cut for the rich?

oh. MINUS 10 million

to the right wing a NEGATIVE number is positive if it affects the
middle class


BTW, you still didn't answer Greg's question. Is it too difficult for you?

"If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come from?"


you socialists destroy corporations

we capitalists create them

and you might want to read what a CONSERVATIVE NOBEL PRIZE WINNER
says:

http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/index.html

The rich bankers and others who took large risks should have taken
much larger haircuts. I have also supported from the beginning of the
recession higher capital requirements for banks, especially for the
large “too big to fail banks” that will be bailed out if they get into
financial difficulties.


gary becker is a nobel prize winning CONSERVATIVE economist

he's concerned about inequality

he's concerned that the financial sector has consumed HUGE resources
with little return

he's concerned that there are too few regulations on large banks

he's CONSERVATIVE

i'm a LIBERAL and i have the same concerns

you right wing socialists dont care.

You spread a lot of bull****, but you've still got two questions you're unable to answer.

1. Uh, how many people have jobs?

2."If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come from?"

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:50:45 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:50:24 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

you socialists destroy corporations

we capitalists create them

How can you be a capitalist if you want to destroy the engine of
capitalism, the capital market.

nice thing about right wingers is they dont read. so it's easy to show
they're wrong

i never said i want DESTROY the markets. i said i want to REGULATE
them to ensure they dont use moral hazard to escape the penalties of
their greed.

the right wants to insulate the market from failures but wants to
ensure they make as much money as possible, even when they fail