|
Charlie Cook Sees GOP Winning Big in 2012
On 11/22/2011 9:07 AM, Drifter wrote:
On 11/22/2011 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/21/11 11:45 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:59:42 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 11/21/11 8:46 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:24:51 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 22:31:43 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:02:02 -0500, wrote: In , says... you're the one betting on polls a year before the election. go back to your security blanket. Obama could be beat by any republican with a pulse. Too bad they haven't found that one yet. yeah. that's cuz aint no republican wiht a pulse I really think the GOP wants Obama to win so it will be a democrat who makes the cuts to SS and Medicare that we are going to have to do. sorry sport. that's already on the table what terrifies the GOP is raising taxes on the rich the GOP has no problem destroying the middle class. but god forbid the rich should pay an extra buck in taxes for all the damage they caused Washington DC doesn't have a revenue problem, they have a spending problem. Everyone is looking for the solution from on wrong side of the ledger. D'oh. Stop channeling the moronic GOP leaders in the house and senate. Where was Bertie when we started bombing rocks in Afghanistan and unseating Saddam? Bush had a spending problem called war. And, he was the one who pushed through the medicare drug bill that put us even further in debt. Funny, didn't hear Bertie say a damned thing when all that spending was goin' on. Bertie was shivering in a corner, hoping and praying he wouldn't get called up and sent to a combat zone. Now that's projecting ones shortcomings onto another. Mommy use her political connections to see to it that you didn't get drafted? His daddy bought him a spot in the one university that would take him... |
Charlie Cook Sees GOP Winning Big in 2012
On 11/22/11 9:28 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/22/2011 9:07 AM, Drifter wrote: On 11/22/2011 8:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/21/11 11:45 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:59:42 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 11/21/11 8:46 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:24:51 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 22:31:43 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:02:02 -0500, wrote: In , says... you're the one betting on polls a year before the election. go back to your security blanket. Obama could be beat by any republican with a pulse. Too bad they haven't found that one yet. yeah. that's cuz aint no republican wiht a pulse I really think the GOP wants Obama to win so it will be a democrat who makes the cuts to SS and Medicare that we are going to have to do. sorry sport. that's already on the table what terrifies the GOP is raising taxes on the rich the GOP has no problem destroying the middle class. but god forbid the rich should pay an extra buck in taxes for all the damage they caused Washington DC doesn't have a revenue problem, they have a spending problem. Everyone is looking for the solution from on wrong side of the ledger. D'oh. Stop channeling the moronic GOP leaders in the house and senate. Where was Bertie when we started bombing rocks in Afghanistan and unseating Saddam? Bush had a spending problem called war. And, he was the one who pushed through the medicare drug bill that put us even further in debt. Funny, didn't hear Bertie say a damned thing when all that spending was goin' on. Bertie was shivering in a corner, hoping and praying he wouldn't get called up and sent to a combat zone. Now that's projecting ones shortcomings onto another. Mommy use her political connections to see to it that you didn't get drafted? His daddy bought him a spot in the one university that would take him... Fascinating how you simps demonstrate your ignorance and stupidity over and over and over and over and over. |
Charlie Cook Sees GOP Winning Big in 2012
|
Charlie Cook Sees GOP Winning Big in 2012
On 20/11/2011 11:58 AM, California Rocket Scientist wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:41:14 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog wrote: Pay attention Herr Krause; you too JIPS- I know the odds are against it, but there remains hope that you both may learn something. http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/was...ng-big-in-2012 We need to face it, we're a nation that claims to be fiscally conservative, yet we never tire of goofy wars to name just one bizarre contradiction. Then when we see the bill we look to elect somebody new no matter what crazy claims he makes as long as he doesn't mention our previous assinine decisons, or criticize us for making them. The latest crazy claims are that the applicants can make up for the 5 trillion cost of the middle east fiasco by cutting taxes further and getting rid of the EPA, unions, etc. Who'd be dumb enough to believe that except for maybe 51% of the voters? So Cook could be right. God help us. Need to get rid of "In Debt We Trust!" and put God back in there. Dishonored debt is a sin. Unpaid debts is a form of theft. -- All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment they think rationally. |
Charlie Cook Sees GOP Winning Big in 2012
On 11/22/11 1:52 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Need to get rid of "In Debt We Trust!" and put God back in there. To be fair, we should alternate that moronic aphorism with others, such as: In Unicorns We Trust In the Tooth Fairy We Trust And so forth |
Charlie Cook Sees GOP Winning Big in 2012
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:59:40 -0500, wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:39:33 -0500, bpuharic wrote: not enough. not enough at all. they pay 15%. i pay 28% Bull****. If you pay 28% you are one of the 1%. Two people, no kids, making a combined $100k end up paying about 11% taking the standard deduction. not too smart are you? 28% is middle class income: http://taxes.about.com/od/Federal-In...1-Tax-Year.htm •10% on taxable income from $0 to $8,500, plus •15% on taxable income over $8,500 to $34,500, plus •25% on taxable income over $34,500 to $83,600, plus •28% on taxable income over $83,600 to $174,400, plus •33% on taxable income over $174,400 to $379,150, plus •35% on taxable income over $379,150. no wonder you're right wing. you're too stupid to be anything BUT.... |
Charlie Cook Sees GOP Winning Big in 2012
On 22/11/2011 2:18 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:59:40 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:39:33 -0500, wrote: not enough. not enough at all. they pay 15%. i pay 28% Bull****. If you pay 28% you are one of the 1%. Two people, no kids, making a combined $100k end up paying about 11% taking the standard deduction. not too smart are you? 28% is middle class income: http://taxes.about.com/od/Federal-In...1-Tax-Year.htm •10% on taxable income from $0 to $8,500, plus •15% on taxable income over $8,500 to $34,500, plus •25% on taxable income over $34,500 to $83,600, plus •28% on taxable income over $83,600 to $174,400, plus •33% on taxable income over $174,400 to $379,150, plus •35% on taxable income over $379,150. no wonder you're right wing. you're too stupid to be anything BUT.... Bull****, the tables you quoted are for taxable income, not gross income you dumb**** loser. With deductions a more typical is about 25% as the marginal (not average) tax rate. Man you're on stupid idiot. -- All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment they think rationally. |
Charlie Cook Sees GOP Winning Big in 2012
On 11/22/2011 4:18 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:59:40 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:39:33 -0500, wrote: not enough. not enough at all. they pay 15%. i pay 28% Bull****. If you pay 28% you are one of the 1%. Two people, no kids, making a combined $100k end up paying about 11% taking the standard deduction. not too smart are you? 28% is middle class income: http://taxes.about.com/od/Federal-In...1-Tax-Year.htm •10% on taxable income from $0 to $8,500, plus •15% on taxable income over $8,500 to $34,500, plus •25% on taxable income over $34,500 to $83,600, plus •28% on taxable income over $83,600 to $174,400, plus •33% on taxable income over $174,400 to $379,150, plus •35% on taxable income over $379,150. no wonder you're right wing. you're too stupid to be anything BUT.... Those are the rates for "taxable" income after deductions, credits, etc. And we do NOT pay 28% on the whole "taxable" amount. There are brackets below the 28% bracket where the applied tax is lower. From your cite the first 8.5K is taxed at 10%. From 8.5K to 34.5K is taxed at 15% and so on. Thus the net percentage paid is lower that 28% for the bracket under discussion. But you're too stupid to know that. I hope your account is smarter than you are. |
Charlie Cook Sees GOP Winning Big in 2012
On Nov 22, 9:18*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:18:32 -0500, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:59:40 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:39:33 -0500, bpuharic wrote: not enough. not enough at all. they pay 15%. i pay 28% Bull****. If you pay 28% you are one of the 1%. Two people, no kids, making a combined $100k end up paying about 11% taking the standard deduction. not too smart are you? 28% is middle class income: http://taxes.about.com/od/Federal-In...ates-For-The-2... •10% on taxable income from $0 to $8,500, plus •15% on taxable income over $8,500 to $34,500, plus •25% on taxable income over $34,500 to $83,600, plus •28% on taxable income over $83,600 to $174,400, plus •33% on taxable income over $174,400 to $379,150, plus •35% on taxable income over $379,150. no wonder you're right wing. you're too stupid to be anything BUT.... Who does your taxes Bob? Let's start with $100,000 (you can follow along with your 1040 book) You start out reducing your taxable income by $11400 for the standard deduction Then you reduce it by $7300 for 2 exemptions You have 81300 that you take to the tax table You get $12, 694 *but you are not done yet Now you subtract $800 from that for the "make work pay" tax credit Your tax on $100,000 is $11,894 That is 11.9%, not 28% That is for someone with no mortgage deduction, no kids no other deductions. but don't let facts confuse what Olbermann is telling you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good Lord... does that cover both Federal and State income taxes? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com