Yeah, I was wondering about how the law prohibiting photographing
industrial installations is worded.

And about just who is qualified to judge the appropriateness of the
photographer's subject. Seems to me there could be some "art" in a
smoking industrial complex set against a background of nature.

Guess we'll just have to ask John A.

Seems like a lot of cosmetic frenzy with "protecting the public" while
the larger (more difficult) problems go unaddressed.




On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 14:00:16 -0400, Galen Hekhuis
wrote:

I have to ask, is this supposed to be
"the land of the free
and the home of the brave"
or the land of the timid living
in fear of people with cameras?