On 18/10/2011 5:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/18/11 7:50 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/18/2011 7:46 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/18/11 7:29 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/18/2011 7:00 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:25:37 -0400, wrote:

http://stixblog.com/2011/08/20/chang...derwear-often/

Good point. If you are negotiating with a bunch of idiots or with
people determined to undermine the process, real change isn't going to
happen.

In the unlikely event that Obama has a second term, HE will be the
idiot, if he stoops to negotiate. He was stupid enough to make that
mistake in the first 4 years.

Yeah, no meetings with republicans, "dead in the water" to any
suggestions them made, more secret meetings with Wall St and other
lobbyists than any other president in history.. Yeah, he "negotiated"
all right... uh, NOT!


I do hope that is the plan for Obama's second term.

No meetings with Republicans...
No consideration of any of their suggestions...

Yeah, cause it worked so well this time... snerk Obama is a failure,
history will not be good to him. Probably the most incompetent president
in 50 years...

Really? Bull****. Dubya holds that sole honor.

Eclipsed by a long shot, 0bama now has the spot.

--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude