Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote: Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary. Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not necessary. What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list? What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in Maryland? You know the rules here. merican skull? If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection they could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more peoples. If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was a good enough aim. If, if, if, if... The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances, vigilante justice or domestic abuse. Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
My take on the Arizona shootings | General | |||
More on shootings by Army sergeant | General | |||
We're still not ready | General | |||
We're still not ready | General | |||
Almost ready | General |