BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   There is commonality.. (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/139222-there-commonality.html)

Wayne B October 2nd 11 12:43 PM

There is commonality..
 
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 23:54:10 -0400, wrote:

My only question is when will we know this war is over?
When we are too broke to fight it anymore?


====

That's what happened to the Soviets.


BAR[_2_] October 2nd 11 01:34 PM

There is commonality..
 
In article ,
says...

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:39:12 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?



Good question. The attack killed about 3000 people and did $100
billion in damage.

The 10 year revenge has cost 6000 American lives and cost over $3
trillion.
We may have killed a quarter of a million innocent civilians in
several countries and we are guessing we have killed about 100 senior
operators in Al Qaeda at about 30 BILLION dollars each.

We are living under a crushing debt we don't seem to be anything
about, security is oppressive and our freedoms here are severely
restricted now.

We really got even with them didn't we.

My only question is when will we know this war is over?
When we are too broke to fight it anymore?


The war has been going on since the Crusades. The war is far from over.

iBoaterer[_2_] October 2nd 11 03:08 PM

There is commonality..
 
In article ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.


And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...


You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?

iBoaterer[_2_] October 2nd 11 03:10 PM

There is commonality..
 
In article ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.


=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?


Bush fixed all of that by color coding the terror alerts, remember? I
think he figured out while coloring with his crayons.

JustWait October 2nd 11 04:23 PM

There is commonality..
 
On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.


And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...


You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?


Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..

JustWait October 2nd 11 04:24 PM

There is commonality..
 
On 10/2/2011 10:10 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?


Bush fixed all of that by color coding the terror alerts, remember? I
think he figured out while coloring with his crayons.


Yeah, better than Obama chewing on them in the corner...

iBoaterer[_2_] October 2nd 11 04:43 PM

There is commonality..
 
In article ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...


You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?


Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..


And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are
saying?

JustWait October 2nd 11 04:54 PM

There is commonality..
 
On 10/2/2011 11:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?


Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..


And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are
saying?


Not talking about Bush, but Obama has taken it to another level.. Bundle
a hundred thousand to Obama, and you get back a half a billion... pretty
good investment of others money, don't 'cha think?

iBoaterer[_2_] October 2nd 11 06:41 PM

There is commonality..
 
In article ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:10 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?


Bush fixed all of that by color coding the terror alerts, remember? I
think he figured out while coloring with his crayons.


Yeah, better than Obama chewing on them in the corner...


Well of course to you that seemed like a great way to stop terrorism....

JustWait October 2nd 11 06:47 PM

There is commonality..
 
On 10/2/2011 1:41 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:10 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?

Bush fixed all of that by color coding the terror alerts, remember? I
think he figured out while coloring with his crayons.


Yeah, better than Obama chewing on them in the corner...


Well of course to you that seemed like a great way to stop terrorism....


I never said anything like that...


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com