There is commonality..
 

....between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.


--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

There is commonality..
 

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/2011 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)

One was shooting at their government officals, one was not...

There is commonality..
 

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.

And yet I've seen no whining from you about Obama's continuous use of missiles to take out untried
terrorists, and their wives and kids.

Gosh, Harry, don't you see the hypocrisy in that?

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/11 10:57 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.

And yet I've seen no whining from you about Obama's continuous use of missiles to take out untried
terrorists, and their wives and kids.

Gosh, Harry, don't you see the hypocrisy in that?

I have previously stated I am not in favor of the continuation of the
wars George W. Bush started under false pretenses. Unfortunately, this
country has not in the past favored the sort of "human intel" that it
takes to target and extricate individuals, and it is only now building
up that capability.

I doubt this country will ever recover from the horrors inflicted upon
it by the Republicans in war mongering, ignoring science, destroying the
economy, et cetera.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

There is commonality..
 

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:01:51 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:57 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.

And yet I've seen no whining from you about Obama's continuous use of missiles to take out untried
terrorists, and their wives and kids.

Gosh, Harry, don't you see the hypocrisy in that?

I have previously stated I am not in favor of the continuation of the
wars George W. Bush started under false pretenses. Unfortunately, this
country has not in the past favored the sort of "human intel" that it
takes to target and extricate individuals, and it is only now building
up that capability.

I doubt this country will ever recover from the horrors inflicted upon
it by the Republicans in war mongering, ignoring science, destroying the
economy, et cetera.

You are a joke.

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/2011 2:10 PM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:01:51 -0400, X ` wrote:


I doubt this country will ever recover from the horrors inflicted upon
it by the Republicans in war mongering, ignoring science, destroying the
economy, et cetera.

You are a joke.

Wow a full auto machine gun post! snerk

There is commonality..
 

On Oct 1, 2:43*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 10/1/2011 2:10 PM, John H wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:01:51 -0400, X ` *wrote:

I doubt this country will ever recover from the horrors inflicted upon
it by the Republicans in war mongering, ignoring science, destroying the
economy, et cetera.

You are a joke.

Wow a full auto machine gun post! snerk

I meant full auto machine gun troll...

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/2011 2:10 PM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:01:51 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:57 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X ` wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.

And yet I've seen no whining from you about Obama's continuous use of missiles to take out untried
terrorists, and their wives and kids.

Gosh, Harry, don't you see the hypocrisy in that?

I have previously stated I am not in favor of the continuation of the
wars George W. Bush started under false pretenses. Unfortunately, this
country has not in the past favored the sort of "human intel" that it
takes to target and extricate individuals, and it is only now building
up that capability.

I doubt this country will ever recover from the horrors inflicted upon
it by the Republicans in war mongering, ignoring science, destroying the
economy, et cetera.

You are a joke.
Sure is. Wasn't he against torture, waterboarding etc. at one time. Now
he's for it. Flip flop flip flop.

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/11 4:49 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:36:49 -0400, X `
wrote:

Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.


OK I apologize, I thought you supported the drone killings


No, I don't. Way back when, during the Bush Error, once I realized that
neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were the cause of 9-11, I turned against
the war, too. If you want to trace the economic downfall of this country
to the multi trillions of dollars these trumped up wars wasted, I won't
argue. And then Bush cut taxes and we didn't pay for them. And got
nothing out of either war. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/2011 4:49 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:36:49 -0400, X `
wrote:

Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.


OK I apologize, I thought you supported the drone killings


The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/2011 5:49 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 4:49 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:36:49 -0400, X `
wrote:

Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.


OK I apologize, I thought you supported the drone killings


No, I don't. Way back when, during the Bush Error, once I realized that
neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were the cause of 9-11, I turned against
the war, too. If you want to trace the economic downfall of this country
to the multi trillions of dollars these trumped up wars wasted, I won't
argue. And then Bush cut taxes and we didn't pay for them. And got
nothing out of either war. Stupid, stupid, stupid.


What spoils of war would you have been happy with?

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/2011 5:51 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 4:49 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:36:49 -0400, X `
wrote:

Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.


OK I apologize, I thought you supported the drone killings


The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

The less complicated terms are "shooting back" and "self defense"...

There is commonality..
 

X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.


Do you really expect others to care what you think? You are an asshole,
Harry.


-HB

There is commonality..
 

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, Drifter wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?

There is commonality..
 

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?

There is commonality..
 

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 23:54:10 -0400, wrote:

My only question is when will we know this war is over?
When we are too broke to fight it anymore?

====

That's what happened to the Soviets.

There is commonality..
 

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:39:12 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?


Good question. The attack killed about 3000 people and did $100
billion in damage.

The 10 year revenge has cost 6000 American lives and cost over $3
trillion.
We may have killed a quarter of a million innocent civilians in
several countries and we are guessing we have killed about 100 senior
operators in Al Qaeda at about 30 BILLION dollars each.

We are living under a crushing debt we don't seem to be anything
about, security is oppressive and our freedoms here are severely
restricted now.

We really got even with them didn't we.

My only question is when will we know this war is over?
When we are too broke to fight it anymore?

The war has been going on since the Crusades. The war is far from over.

There is commonality..
 

In article ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?

There is commonality..
 

In article ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?

Bush fixed all of that by color coding the terror alerts, remember? I
think he figured out while coloring with his crayons.

There is commonality..
 

On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?

Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..

There is commonality..
 

On 10/2/2011 10:10 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?

Bush fixed all of that by color coding the terror alerts, remember? I
think he figured out while coloring with his crayons.

Yeah, better than Obama chewing on them in the corner...

There is commonality..
 

In article ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?

Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..

And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are
saying?

There is commonality..
 

On 10/2/2011 11:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?

Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..

And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are
saying?

Not talking about Bush, but Obama has taken it to another level.. Bundle
a hundred thousand to Obama, and you get back a half a billion... pretty
good investment of others money, don't 'cha think?

There is commonality..
 

In article ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:10 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?

Bush fixed all of that by color coding the terror alerts, remember? I
think he figured out while coloring with his crayons.

Yeah, better than Obama chewing on them in the corner...

Well of course to you that seemed like a great way to stop terrorism....

There is commonality..
 

On 10/2/2011 1:41 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:10 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?

Bush fixed all of that by color coding the terror alerts, remember? I
think he figured out while coloring with his crayons.

Yeah, better than Obama chewing on them in the corner...

Well of course to you that seemed like a great way to stop terrorism....

I never said anything like that...

There is commonality..
 

In article ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 11:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?

Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..

And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are
saying?

Not talking about Bush, but Obama has taken it to another level.. Bundle
a hundred thousand to Obama, and you get back a half a billion... pretty
good investment of others money, don't 'cha think?

Prove that.

There is commonality..
 

On Oct 2, 10:23*am, JustWait wrote:
On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:









In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:

*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)

Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.

Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.

Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?

Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..

Now that you've mentioned "crony -ism, " it looks like Madame Pelosi
must defend her brother-in-law. Actually, she must defend herself
BEFORE the allegations and indictments come oozing to the surface.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...lar-plant.html

There is commonality..
 

On 10/2/2011 1:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 11:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?

Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..

And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are
saying?

Not talking about Bush, but Obama has taken it to another level.. Bundle
a hundred thousand to Obama, and you get back a half a billion... pretty
good investment of others money, don't 'cha think?

Prove that.

Pffffttt. that all you got.. You know good well what's been going on.
Even the dem pundits aren't denying it anymore, just saying it's
"politics as usual" which of course means, we get away with it and you
don't, just ask Tom Delay...snerk

Anyway, you have just proven you are either uninformed, or lying like so
many others here do when the facts don't line up for them.. Sorry, but
you will have to play with someone else...

There is commonality..
 

On 10/2/2011 2:19 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Oct 2, 10:23 am, wrote:
On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:









In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:

*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)

Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.

Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.

Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?

Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..

Now that you've mentioned "crony -ism, " it looks like Madame Pelosi
must defend her brother-in-law. Actually, she must defend herself
BEFORE the allegations and indictments come oozing to the surface.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...lar-plant.html

Yup, and they snuck it out on the last day, just under the wire when
they know already the technology is going to fail, with a 100% certainty
but hey, you know those California Congresswomen have a golden goose
here and they have no intention of stopping.. even after we vote them
out...

There is commonality..
 

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 08:34:24 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:39:12 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?


Good question. The attack killed about 3000 people and did $100
billion in damage.

The 10 year revenge has cost 6000 American lives and cost over $3
trillion.
We may have killed a quarter of a million innocent civilians in
several countries and we are guessing we have killed about 100 senior
operators in Al Qaeda at about 30 BILLION dollars each.

We are living under a crushing debt we don't seem to be anything
about, security is oppressive and our freedoms here are severely
restricted now.

We really got even with them didn't we.

My only question is when will we know this war is over?
When we are too broke to fight it anymore?

The war has been going on since the Crusades. The war is far from over.


Maybe you forget how the Crusades came out.

I know how the crusades came out. The problem is that the other side has
not advanced politically and culturally since the crusades. They are
still telling their followers, just like the communists, that the dream
won't be realized until the whole world is of one mind, their mind.

The war is far from over.

There is commonality..
 

On 10/2/11 6:24 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 08:34:24 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:39:12 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?


Good question. The attack killed about 3000 people and did $100
billion in damage.

The 10 year revenge has cost 6000 American lives and cost over $3
trillion.
We may have killed a quarter of a million innocent civilians in
several countries and we are guessing we have killed about 100 senior
operators in Al Qaeda at about 30 BILLION dollars each.

We are living under a crushing debt we don't seem to be anything
about, security is oppressive and our freedoms here are severely
restricted now.

We really got even with them didn't we.

My only question is when will we know this war is over?
When we are too broke to fight it anymore?

The war has been going on since the Crusades. The war is far from over.


Maybe you forget how the Crusades came out.

I know how the crusades came out. The problem is that the other side has
not advanced politically and culturally since the crusades. They are
still telling their followers, just like the communists, that the dream
won't be realized until the whole world is of one mind, their mind.

The war is far from over.


Wait a minute...are you describing...the end of days?

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

There is commonality..
 

On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:19:11 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote:

On Oct 2, 10:23*am, JustWait wrote:
On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:









In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:

*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)

Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.

Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.

Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?

Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..

Now that you've mentioned "crony -ism, " it looks like Madame Pelosi
must defend her brother-in-law. Actually, she must defend herself
BEFORE the allegations and indictments come oozing to the surface.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...lar-plant.html

Funny how that story never made it to NBC, CBS, or ABC. Didn't see it in the Washington Post either.
Heard it on the radio a few days ago.

There is commonality..
 

In article ,
says...

On 10/2/11 6:24 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 08:34:24 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:39:12 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?


Good question. The attack killed about 3000 people and did $100
billion in damage.

The 10 year revenge has cost 6000 American lives and cost over $3
trillion.
We may have killed a quarter of a million innocent civilians in
several countries and we are guessing we have killed about 100 senior
operators in Al Qaeda at about 30 BILLION dollars each.

We are living under a crushing debt we don't seem to be anything
about, security is oppressive and our freedoms here are severely
restricted now.

We really got even with them didn't we.

My only question is when will we know this war is over?
When we are too broke to fight it anymore?

The war has been going on since the Crusades. The war is far from over.


Maybe you forget how the Crusades came out.

I know how the crusades came out. The problem is that the other side has
not advanced politically and culturally since the crusades. They are
still telling their followers, just like the communists, that the dream
won't be realized until the whole world is of one mind, their mind.

The war is far from over.


Wait a minute...are you describing...the end of days?

Go find a bible thumper to berate.

There is commonality..
 

On 10/2/11 7:17 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:19:11 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Oct 2, 10:23 am, wrote:
On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:









In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:

*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)

Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.

Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.

Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?

Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..

Now that you've mentioned "crony -ism, " it looks like Madame Pelosi
must defend her brother-in-law. Actually, she must defend herself
BEFORE the allegations and indictments come oozing to the surface.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...lar-plant.html

Funny how that story never made it to NBC, CBS, or ABC. Didn't see it in the Washington Post either.
Heard it on the radio a few days ago.

So that's what you do...you sit in front of a half dozen TV sets all day
long, looking for news about Pelosi. Yawn.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

There is commonality..
 

On 10/2/11 7:26 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleg4ydnQPA0cwoexXTnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@earthlink .com,
says...

On 10/2/11 6:24 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 08:34:24 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:39:12 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... ;) Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?


Good question. The attack killed about 3000 people and did $100
billion in damage.

The 10 year revenge has cost 6000 American lives and cost over $3
trillion.
We may have killed a quarter of a million innocent civilians in
several countries and we are guessing we have killed about 100 senior
operators in Al Qaeda at about 30 BILLION dollars each.

We are living under a crushing debt we don't seem to be anything
about, security is oppressive and our freedoms here are severely
restricted now.

We really got even with them didn't we.

My only question is when will we know this war is over?
When we are too broke to fight it anymore?

The war has been going on since the Crusades. The war is far from over.


Maybe you forget how the Crusades came out.

I know how the crusades came out. The problem is that the other side has
not advanced politically and culturally since the crusades. They are
still telling their followers, just like the communists, that the dream
won't be realized until the whole world is of one mind, their mind.

The war is far from over.


Wait a minute...are you describing...the end of days?

Go find a bible thumper to berate.



Well, Bertie, the example you cited isn't much different than what the
fundies want in the usa...a "christian" nation.



--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.