| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Due Process???
On Oct 1, 11:09*am, wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
On 10/1/2011 11:12 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... Nor do I. Cept it was much nicer before the towel heads took up residence. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
|
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
In article ,
says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect? |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
On Oct 5, 8:58*am, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" *wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait *wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess.... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. *America does not rule the world. *Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
On 10/5/11 9:15 AM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. That's right...Canada is civilized...it has done away with executions. America, the land of Christianity, has not. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
|
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
On 05/10/2011 7:17 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/5/11 9:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. That's right...Canada is civilized...it has done away with executions. America, the land of Christianity, has not. Don't make me laugh. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Due Process???
On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| One for Scotty due to the Spoofer..... | General | |||
| no boating due to politics | General | |||
| Where Credit Is Due | ASA | |||
| Due to falling poll numbers... | General | |||
| Credit where it's Due | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
